Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 109, Issue 4, pp 2263–2276 | Cite as

An Active Noise Control System for Impulsive Noise Using Soft Threshold FxLMS Algorithm with Harmonic Mean Step Size

  • V. SaravananEmail author
  • N. Santhiyakumari
Article
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

One of the effective technique to limit most of the unwanted noise irrespective of noise-frequency component is Active noise control (ANC) system. Filtered-x Least-Mean-Square (FxLMS) algorithm based on step-size parameter is used in ANC method to control noise. ANC system with small step size are stable than with large step size since large step size leads to sensitivity to any random change in noise. The proposed method develops a novel soft threshold based FxLMS (STFxLMS) algorithm with harmonic mean based variable step size (HMVSS). By constantly changing the step-size of this algorithm corresponding to the input noise signal and error signal recorded from the error microphone, the convergence rate of ANC system towards the desired output was improved. The improvement in noise reduction using HMVSS compared with fixed step was demonstrated using computer simulations. Anti-noise signal was also generated experimentally to limit the noise from noise source.

Keywords

Impulsive noise FxLMS algorithm FxLMP algorithm Sun’s algorithm Akthar’s algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the ELGI Ultra Industries Limited, Coimbatore for providing the details related to the noise generated by the mixer grinders and necessary aids to complete this project successfully.

References

  1. 1.
    Li, M., Duan, J., & Lim, C. L. (2010). Active noise cancellation systems for vehicle interior sound quality refinement. Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering,3(3), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nelson, P. A., & Elliott, S. J. (1996). Active control of sound. Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuo, M., & Morgan, R. (1996). Active noise control system: Algorithm and DSP implementations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paul L (1936) Process of silencing sound oscillations. In Google Patents.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elliott, S. (2000). Signal processing for active control. Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliott, S. J., & Nelson, P. A. (1993). Active noise control. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine,10(4), 12–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuo, S. M., & Morgan, D. (1995). Active noise control systems: Algorithms and DSP implementations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuo, S. M., & Morgan, D. R. (1999). Active noise control: A tutorial review. Proceedings of the IEEE,87(6), 943–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuo, S. M., & Vijayan, D. (1997). A secondary path modeling technique for active noise control systems. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing,5(4), 374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akhtar, M. T., Abe, M., & Kawamata, M. (2006). A new variable step size LMS algorithm-based method for improved online secondary path modeling in active noise control systems. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing,14(2), 720–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nikias, C. L., & Shao, M. (1995). Signal processing with alpha-stable distributions and applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shao, M., & Nikias, C. L. (1993). Signal processing with fractional lower order moments: Stable processes and their applications. Proceedings of the IEEE,81(7), 986–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ardekani, I. T., & Abdulla, W. H. (2011). On the stability of adaptation process in active noise control systems. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,129(1), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leahy, R., Zhou, Z., Hsu, Y.-C. (1995). Adaptive filtering of stable processes for active attenuation of impulsive noise. In 1995 international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 1995 ICASSP-95. IEEE: 2983–2986.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun, X., Kuo, S. M., & Meng, G. (2006). Adaptive algorithm for active control of impulsive noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration,291(1), 516–522.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akhtar, M. T., & Mitsuhashi, W. (2008). Improved adaptive algorithm for active noise control of impulsive noise. In MWSCAS 2008 51st Midwest symposium on circuits and systems: 2008 (pp. 330–333). IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akhtar, M. T., & Mitsuhashi, W. (2009). Improving performance of FxLMS algorithm for active noise control of impulsive noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration,327(3), 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghanbari, Y., & Karami-Mollaei, M. R. (2006). A new approach for speech enhancement based on the adaptive thresholding of the wavelet packets. Speech Communication,48(8), 927–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Donoho, D. (1995). Denoising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,41, 613–627.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringKnowledge Institute of TechnologyKakapalayam, SalemIndia

Personalised recommendations