Advertisement

Performance of RSS Based Cooperative Localization in Millimeter Wave Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Mohamed ShalabyEmail author
  • Mona Shokair
  • Nagy Wadie Messiha
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Localization in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is a necessity as there is a vital need to have location information combined with the measured quantities. The received signal strength (RSS) based localization is a simple and a cheap model but it provides a low positioning accuracy. However, its accuracy can be enhanced by applying a cooperation mechanism among sensors. In this paper, the performance of RSS, based localization, and its cooperative version are studied, analyzed, and simulated in WSNs which operate in the millimeter wave frequency bands. Moreover, this performance is compared with that of WSNs which operate in radio bands. It can be concluded that, the positioning accuracy is high in WSNs operating in millimeter wave bands. Moreover, their performance is better than that of the corresponding WSNs operating in radio bands especially at low levels of signal to noise ratio.

Keywords

WSN Localization RSS Cooperative localization Millimeter wave LLS 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., & Ghosal, D. (2008). Wireless sensor network survey. Computer Networks, 52(12), 2292–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tubaishat, M., & Madria, S. (2003). Sensor networks: An overview. IEEE Potentials, 22(2), 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arampatzis, T., Lygeros, J., & Manesis, S. (2005). A survey of applications of wireless sensors and wireless sensor networks. In International symposium on control and automation (pp. 719–724). Limassol: IEEE.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharma, D., Verma, S., & Sharma, K. (2013). Network topologies in wireless sensor networks: A review. International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology, 4(3), 93–97.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dargie, W. W., & Poellabauer, C. (2010). Fundamentals of wireless sensor networks: Theory and practice, Wiley series on wireless communications and mobile computing (pp. 1–311). ISBN: 978-0-470-99765-9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meghani, S. K., & Asif, M. (2014). Localization of WSN node based on RTT TOA using ultra wide band & 802.15.4a channel. In 11th International conference on networking, sensing, and control (ICNSC) (pp. 380–385). Miami: IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zheng, Y., Wang, H., Wan, L., & Zhong, X. (2009). A placement strategy for accurate TOA localization algorithm. In Seventh annual conference on communication networks and services research (CNSR) (pp. 166–170). Moncton: IEEE.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alsindi, N., Duan, C., Zhang, J., & Tsuboi, T. (2009). NLOS channel identification and mitigation in ultra wideband TOA based wireless sensor networks. In 6th Workshop on positioning, navigation, and communication (WPNC) (pp. 59–66). Hannover.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeong, S., Sung, T. K., Lee, K. E., & Kang, J. (2014). Joint TOA/AOA-based localization in wireless sensor networks. In 8th International conference on signal processing and communication systems (ICSPCS) (pp. 1–5). Gold Coast.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaune, R. (2012). Finding sensor trajectories for TDOA based localization preliminary considerations. In Workshop on sensor data fusion (SDF) (pp. 55–59). Bonn.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wei, J., Ji, Y., & Yu, C. (2014). Experimental verification of bias reduction in TDOA based localization. In 11th International conference on control & automation (ICCA) (pp. 7–12). Taichung: IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, R., Höflinger, F., & Reindl, L. M. (2012). TDOA based localization using interacting multiple model estimator and ultrasonic transmitter/receiver. In 9th International multi-conference on systems, signals, and devices (SSD) (pp. 1–6). Chemnitz.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan, Y. S., Wang, H. Y., Shen, X. H., Yang, F. Z., & Chen, Z. (2012). Efficient convex optimization method for underwater passive source localization based on RSS with WSN. In International conference on signal processing, communication, and computing (ICSPCC) (pp. 171–174). IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, Y. C., Sun, W. C., & Juang, J. C. (2010). Outlier detection technique for RSS based localization problems in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of annual conference (SICE) (pp. 657–662). Taipei.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muswieck, B. D. S., Russi, J. L., & Heckler, M. V. T. (2013). Hybrid method uses RSS and AOA to establish a low cost localization system. In Fourth Argentine symposium and conference on embedded systems (SASE/CASE) (pp. 1–6). Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stoyanova, T., Kerasiotis, F., Antonopoulos, C., & Papadopoulos, G. (2014). RSS based localization for wireless sensor networks in practice. In 9th International symposium on communication systems, networks & digital signal processing (CSNDSP) (pp. 134–139). Manchester.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coluccia, A., & Ricciato, F. (2010). On ML estimation for automatic RSS based indoor localization. In International symposium on wireless pervasive computing (ISWPC) (pp. 495–502). Modena: IEEE.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    AlHajri, M. I., et al. (2015). Hybrid RSS-DOA technique for enhanced WSN localization in a correlated environment. In International conference on information and communication technology research (ICTRC) (pp. 238–241). Abu Dhabi.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomic, S., Beko, M., & Dinis, R. (2017). 3-D target localization in wireless sensor networks using RSS and AoA measurements. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(4), 3197–3210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou, B., Chen, Q., & Xiao, P. (2017). The error propagation analysis of the received signal strength-based simultaneous localization and tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 63(6), 3983–4007.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Shen, L., Yan, F., & Song, T. (2016). A cooperative localization algorithm with cluster nodes selection based on Cramer–Rao lower bound. In 84th Vehicular technology conference (VTC-Fall) (pp. 1–5). Montreal, QC: IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liang, C., & Wen, F. (2016). Received signal strength based robust cooperative localization with dynamic path loss model. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(5), 1265–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shalaby, M., Shokair, M., & Messiha, N. W. (2017). Performance enhancement of TOA localized wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communictions, 95(4), 4667–4679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Akdeniz, M. R., Liu, Y., Samimi, M. K., Sun, S., Rangan, S., Rappaport, T. S., et al. (2014). Millimeter wave channel modeling and cellular capacity evaluation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1164–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zekavat, R., & Buehrer, R. M. (2012). Handbook of position location: Theory, practice and advances. New York: IEEE Press, Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-94342-7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Shalaby
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mona Shokair
    • 1
  • Nagy Wadie Messiha
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electronic EngineeringMenoufia UniversityMenoufEgypt

Personalised recommendations