Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 108, Issue 2, pp 711–728 | Cite as

An Optimize-Aware Target Tracking Method Combining MAC Layer and Active Nodes in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Amir JavadpourEmail author
Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Target tracking applications are very popular in wireless sensor networks (WSN) as they can be used in industrial, healthcare, smart home, etc. This study proposes a method for reducing energy consumption in WSNs, considering target tracking. A prediction method is also presented using a combination of Medium Access Control layer and active modes to track the target while the rest of nodes are sleep. Nodes in network are categorized into target detection, target monitoring, and off modes. When target enters the environment, other available nodes sense it and change their situation into detection mode. Proposed method reduces energy consumption by decreasing number of involved nodes in target tracking and activating merely a limited number of necessary nodes. Target tracking continues as long as target is visible through representative nodes which are two closest nodes to the target. The conducted experiments using NS2 simulator and MATLAB represent higher performance of proposed algorithm compared to similar studies. The evaluation metrics are energy consumption, number of involved nodes and system throughput. This means the proposed method is superior and more efficient.

Keywords

Active nodes MAC layer Energy efficiency Target tracking Wireless sensor networks Target tracking 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61632009 and 61472451, in part by the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation under Grant 2017A030308006 and Hgh-Level Talents Program of Higher Education in Guangdong Province under Grant 2016ZJ01.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhatti, S., & Xu, J. (2009). Survey of target tracking protocols using wireless sensor network. In Fifth international conference on wireless and mobile communications, 2009. ICWMC’09 (pp. 110–115).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chi, Y.-P., & Chang, H.-P. (2013). A tracking-assisted routing scheme for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 70(1), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Javadpour, A., Memarzadeh-Tehran, H., & Saghafi, F. (2015). A temperature monitoring system incorporating an array of precision wireless thermometers. In 2015 international conference on smart sensors and application (ICSSA) (pp. 155–160).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, L., Yang, W., & Wang, G. (2016). Intelligent fusion of information derived from received signal strength and inertial measurements for indoor wireless localization. AEU: International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 70(9), 1105–1113.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng, J., Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Liang, S., Xing, X., & Wang, G. (2014). Auction-based adaptive sensor activation algorithm for target tracking in wireless sensor networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 39, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharif, H. R., & Kavian, Y. S. (2015). Technological breakthroughs in modern wireless sensor applications. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Q., Guo, Y., Wu, J., & Wang, G. (2017). Effective query grouping strategy in clouds. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 32(6), 1231–1249.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Safavi, S. M., Meybodi, M. R., & Esnaashari, M. (2014). Learning automata based face-aware mobicast. Wireless Personal Communications, 77(3), 1923–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, S., Choo, K.-K. R., Liu, Q., & Wang, G. (2017). Enhancing privacy through uniform grid and caching in location-based services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 86, 881–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Javadpour, A., Kazemi Abharian, S., & Wang, G. (2017). Feature selection and intrusion detection in cloud environment based on machine learning algorithms. In 2017 IEEE international symposium on parallel and distributed processing with application 2017 IEEE international conference on ubiquitous computing and communications (pp. 1417–1421).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Wu, J., Wang, G., Cao, J., Jiang, W., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2017). Towards cyber-physical systems design for structural health monitoring: Hurdles and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems, 1(4), 19:1–19:26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rostami, A. S., Badkoobe, M., Mohanna, F., Keshavarz, H., Hosseinabadi, A. A. R., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2018). Survey on clustering in heterogeneous and homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Journal of Supercomputing, 74(1), 277–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yin, X., Ling, Z., Guan, L., & Liang, F. (2014). Minimum distance clustering algorithm based on an improved differential evolution. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 15(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Javadpour, A., & Memarzadeh-Tehran, H. (2015). A wearable medical sensor for provisional healthcare. In ISPTS 2015: 2nd international symposium on physics and technology of sensors: Dive deep into sensors, proceedings (pp. 293–296).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Wu, J., Wang, G., Wang, T., & Hassan, M. M. (2017). e-Sampling: Event-sensitive autonomous adaptive sensing and low-cost monitoring in networked sensing systems. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 12(1), 1:1–1:29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peng, Z., & Wang, G. (2017). An optimal energy-saving real-time task-scheduling algorithm for mobile terminals. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(5), 1550147717707891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shokouhi Rostami, A., Mohanna, F., & Keshavarz, H. (2017). A novel energy-aware target tracking method by reducing active nodes in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 95(4), 3585–3599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, J. C. J., Cao, K. C. K., Sun, Y. S. Y., & Shen, X. S. X. (2012). Adaptive sensor activation for target tracking in wireless sensor networks. In 2012 IEEE international conference on communication (vol. 2012).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khakpour, S., Pazzi, R. W., & El-Khatib, K. (2014) A prediction based clustering algorithm for target tracking in vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international symposium on development and analysis of intelligent vehicular networks and applications (pp. 39–46).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, Z., Lou, W., Wang, Z., Ma, J., & Chen, H. (2010). A novel mobility management scheme for target tracking in cluster-based sensor networks. In R. Rajaraman, T. Moscibroda, A. Dunkels, & A. Scaglione (Eds.), Distributed computing in sensor systems sE—13 (Vol. 6131, pp. 172–186). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banaezadeh, F., & Haghighat, A. (2015). Evaluation ARIMA modeling-based target tracking scheme in wireless sensor networks using statistical tests. Wireless Personal Communications, 84(4), 2913–2925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sann, Z., & Minn, K. T. (2011). Simulation of the rumor routing algorithm in sensor networks. In 2011 3rd international conference on computer research and development (ICCRD) (vol. 3, pp. 10–14).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu, D., & Zhang, J. (2011). A multi-sink and multi-object tracking strategy for wireless sensor networks. In 2011 international conference on electrical and control engineering (ICECE) (pp. 4273–4276).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ghaffari, A. (2014). An energy efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks using A-star algorithm. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 12(4), 815–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Chen, H., Li, J., Li, H., & Shen, J. (2013). HierTrack: An energy-efficient cluster-based target tracking system forwireless sensor networks. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C, 14(6), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Campos, A. N., Souza, E. L., Nakamura, F. G., Nakamura, E. F., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2012). On the impact of localization and density control algorithms in target tracking applications for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 12, 6930–6952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hajiaghajani, F., Naderan, M., Pedram, H., & Dehghan, M. (2012). HCMTT: Hybrid clustering for multi-target tracking in wireless sensor networks. In 2012 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOM Workshops) (pp. 889–894).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naderan, M., Dehghan, M., Pedram, H., & Hakami, V. (2012). Survey of mobile object tracking protocols in wireless sensor networks: A network-centric perspective. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(1), 34–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cho, S., Han, L., Joo, B., & Han, S. (2014). P-LEACH : An efficient cluster-based technique to track mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10, 803656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim, W., Yoo, J. H., & Kim, H. J. (2012). Multi-target tracking using distributed SVM training over wireless sensor networks. In 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 2439–2444).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Issariyakul, T., & Hossain, E. (2012). Introduction to network simulator NS2. SpringerUS. https://books.google.nl/books?id=_VkTzFLnwD4C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moussa, N., Nasri, F., & Tourki, R. (2014). NOC architecture comparison with network simulator NS2. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 13(7), 340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar, K. S. A., & Balakrishna, R. (2017). Comparative analysis of delay and throughput using IEEE 802.11 and receiver centric-MAC protocol in wireless sensor networks. In 2017 innovations in power and advanced computing technologies (i-PACT) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Javadpour, A., Adelpour, N., Wang, G., & Peng, T. (2018). Combing fuzzy clustering and PSO algorithms to optimize energy consumption in WSN networks. In 2018 IEEE SmartWorld, ubiquitous intelligence & computing, advanced & trusted computed, scalable computing & communications, cloud & big data computing, internet of people and smart city innovation (pp. 1371–1377).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and Cyber EngineeringGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations