OFDM-ML-IDM System for Efficient Wireless Image Transmission

  • Esam A. A. Hagras
  • Ahmed E. Zein El-DinEmail author


In this paper, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing multi-layer interleaved division multiplexing (OFDM-ML-IDM) system is proposed as an efficient image communication system. Regardless the image compression technique, in the proposed image communication system the digital image signal is represented with the digital data of non-compressed image format. Recently, coded IDM communications never got much attention as a promising image transmission technique. The main idea is to use both multi-layer coded IDM and chip-by-chip iterative detection concepts for both bandwidth efficiency and efficient detection, respectively. Different simulation parameters effect such as number of IDM layers, number of receiver iterations and non-linear power amplifier effects are studied. The system performance is also investigated in wireless Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh fading channels. The key performance indicators that are used for measuring the system performance are the visual quality metric in-terms of Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) performance and the system reliability in-terms of bit error rate performance. The main contribution in this paper is to prove that: based on the application requirement and at definite SNR points; the multi-layer IDM reflects a slight performance change compared with the bandwidth consumption. Simulation results show that at low \(SNR = 6 \;{\text{dB}}\) for single and double layers case study, the PSNR performance is \(51.1073 \;{\text{dB}}\) and \(48.5636\; {\text{dB}}\) respectively at wireless AWGN channel, but the double layer IDM achieves \(50\%\) efficient bandwidth than single layer for exchange only \(2.5437\; {\text{dB}}\) which is considered a minor PSNR performance compared with single layer IDM, as well as the quad layers PSNR performance is \(36.1849\; {\text{dB}}\) with \(25\varvec{\% }\) bandwidth consumption. For high \(SNR\), the performance has an excellent visual quality metric with efficient bandwidth consumption. Signal distortion technique such as clipping and companding methods are used to overcome the originated high peak to average power ratio based ML-IDM with large OFDM envelope fluctuations; hence we study the clip ratio and companding parameter effect on the visual quality metric performance.


OFDM-ML-IDM PA AWGN CBC iterative detection 



  1. 1.
    Gonzalea, R. C., & Woods, R. E. (2004). Digital image processing (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Skodras, A., Christopoulos, C., & Ebrahimi, T. (2001). The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18, 36–58.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chourasiya, R., & Shrivastava, A. (2012). A study of image compression based transmission algorithm using SPIHT for low bit rate application. Advanced Computing: An International Journal (ACIJ), 3(6), 47–54.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bito, J., Hoöhne, T., Schulz, H., & Nol, P. (1998). Multi-path fading effects on integrated video, voice and data transmission in hybrid code BPSK-DS/CDMA Systems. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 12(2), 183–192.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dang, P. P., & Chau, P. M. (2000). Robust image transmission over CDMA channels. IEEE Trans on Consumer Electronics, 46, 3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Bakary, E. M., Hassan, E. S., Zahran, O., El-Dolil, S. A., & Abd El-Samie, F. E. (2013). Efficient image transmission with Multi-carrier CDMA. Wireless Personal Communications, 69(2), 979–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jindal S., Agarwal D. (2014). Performance evaluation of image transmission over MC-CDMA system using two interleaving systems. In Procedings of the ICACCI2014 (pp. 1341–1347).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Junaid, A. F., & Al-kamali, F. S. (2015). Efficient wireless transmission system based on the recent DST-MC-CDMA (pp. 1–12). Wirel. Netw. J.: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, S. C. (2010). OFDMA system analysis and design. Norwood: Artech House.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, J., Wu, X., & Laroia, R. (2013). OFDMA mobile broadband communications: A systems approach (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Myung, H. G., & Goodman, D. J. (2008). Single carrier FDMA a new air interface for long term evaluation. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-Kamali, F. S., Qasem, A. A., Abuasbaa, S. A., & Qasem, G. A. (2016). SC-FDMA and OFDMA: An efficient wireless image transmission systems. Journal of Control and Systems Engineering, 4(1), 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Y., Lu, H., Li, Z., & Li, J. (2017). Robust Satellite image transmission over bandwidth-constrained wireless channels. In IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Viterbi, A. J., & Omura, J. K. (1979). Principles of digital communication and coding. New York: Mc-Graw Hill.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berrou, C., Glavieux, A., & Thitimajshima, P. (1993). Near shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: Turbo codes (1). In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC”93) (Vol. 2, pp. 1064–1070).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burr, A. G., & White, G. P. (1999). Performance of turbo-coded OFDM. In Proceedings of the IEE colloquium on turbo codes in digital broadcasting (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Savitha, H. M., & Kulkarni, M. (2010). Performance evaluation of turbo coded OFDM systems and application of turbo decoding for impulsive channel. ICTACT Journal on Communication Technology, 1, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gallager, R. (1962). Low-density parity-check codes. IRE Transactions on information theory, 8(1), 21–28.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soliman, N. F., Albagory, Y., Elbendary, M. A., Al-Hanafy, W., El-Rabaie, E. M., Alshebeili, S. A., et al. (2014). Chaotic interleaving for robust image transmission with LDPC coded OFDM. Wireless Personal Communications, 79(3), 2141–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leung, W. K., Wu, K. Y., & Ping, L. (2003). Interleave division multiplexing space time codes. In 57th IEEE vehicular technology conference, VTC 2003-Spring. Semiannual (pp. 1094–1098).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ping, L., Lihai Liu, K., & Leung, W. K. (2004). On interleave-division multiple-access. IEEE Communications Society, 5, 2869–2873.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ping, L., Liu, L., Keying, W. W., & Leung, K. (2006). Interleave division multiple access. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 5(4), 938–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shukla, M. K. (2010). Performance evaluation of IDMA system in wireless communication. PhD thesis, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kusume, K., Bauch, G., & Utschick, W. (2012). IDMA vs. CDMA: Analysis and comparison of two multiple access systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krikidis, I. (2009). Analysis and optimization issues for superposition modulation in cooperative networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(9), 4837–4847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schlegel, C., Burnashev, M., & Truhachev, D. (2010). Generalized superposition modulation and iterative demodulation: A capacity investigation. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2010, 1–9.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hao, D., & Hoeher, P. A. (2010). Superposition modulation with reliability-based hybrid detection. In 6th International symposium on turbo codes & iterative information processing (pp. 280–284).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoeher, P. A., & Wo, T. (2011). Superposition modulation: myths and facts. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(12), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rahmatallah, Y., & Mohan, S. (2013). Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials., 15(4), 1567–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bisht, M., & Joshi, A. (2015). Various techniques to reduce PAPR in OFDM systems: A survey. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 8(11), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mowla, M., Ali, M., & Aoni, R. A. (2014). Performance comparison of two clipping based filtering methods for PAPR reduction in OFDM signal. International Journal of Mobile Network Communications & Telematics, 4(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    AL-Hashmi, Z. S. H. (2015). An overview: Peak to average power ratio (PAPR) in OFDM system using some new PAPR techniques (with matlab code). Baghdad, College of Engineering Electronic & Communications Engineering Department.
  33. 33.
    Fazel, K., & Kaiser, S. (2008). Multi-carrier and spread spectrum systems from OFDM and MC-CDMA to LTE and WiMAX (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wu, H., Ping, L., & Perotti, A. (2006). User-specific chip-level interleaver design for IDMA system. IEEE Electronics Letters, 42, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shukla, M., Srivastava, V. K., & Tiwari, S. (2008). Analysis and design of tree based interleaver for multiuser receivers in IDMA System. In Proceedings 16 th IEEE international conference on networks, ICON’08 (pp. 1–4).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shukla, M., Srivastava, V. K., & Tiwari, S. (2009). Analysis and design of optimum interleaver for iterative receivers in IDMA system. Wiley Journal of Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing, 9(10), 1312–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shukla, M., Srivastava, V. K., & Tiwari, S. (2009). A parallel interleaver design for IDMA systems. In Proceedings international conference on wireless communications & signal processing, WCSP ‘09 (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gupta, R., Kanaujia, B. K., Chauhan, R. C. S., & Shukla, M. (2010). Prime number based interleaver for multiuser iterative IDMA systems. In International conference on computational intelligence and communication networks (pp. 603–607).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bie, H., & Bie, Z. (2006). A hybrid multiple access system: OFDMA-IDMA. In 1st International conference on communications and networking in China (pp. 1–3).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eldin, A. Z., Hagras, E. A., & Abdel-Kader, H. M. (2014). Performance analysis of single code SCM-OFDM in mobile communication system. In: International conference on engineering and technology (ICET) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Singh, A., & Kaur, H. (2012). Non linearity analysis of high power amplifier in OFDM system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 37(2), 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stefano, R. (2011). Advanced signal and receiver design for next generation OFDM systems. Thesis (PhD), University of Bologna.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jari, Y. (2010.). Iterative detection, decoding and channel estimation in MIMO-OFDM. Thesis (PhD), University of Oulu.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mark C. R. (2013). Iterative receiver techniques for coded multiple access communication systems. Thesis (PhD). University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li, P., Guo, Q. H., & Tong, J. (2007). The OFDM-IDMA approach to wireless communication systems. IEEE Wireless Commun., 14(3), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communication and Computers Dept., Faculty of EngineeringDelta University for Science and TechnologyGamasa, MansouraEgypt

Personalised recommendations