Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 119–134 | Cite as

Micro and Macro Network Slicing: An Experimental Assessment of the Impact of Increasing Numbers of Slices

  • Flávio Meneses
  • Rui Silva
  • Daniel CorujoEmail author
  • Rui L. Aguiar


The fifth generation (5G) telecommunications network aims not only to enhance traffic performance and allow efficient management, but also to enable it to dynamically and flexibly adapt to the traffic demands of different vertical scenarios. In order to support that enablement, the underlying network procedures (i.e., network functions) are being virtualized and deployed in cloud-based environments, allowing for a more optimized usage of the infra-structure resources. In addition, such resources can be sliced, allowing isolated provisioning to specific network functions allocated to disparate vertical deployments. As network slices are envisaged by network operators to fulfill a small number of slices, able to cater towards essential 5G scenario demands (i.e., enhanced mobile broadband, massive machine-type communications and ultra reliable low-latency communications), the total amount of slices existing in a system is currently dictated by the underlying operational overhead placed over the cloud infra-structure. This paper explores the challenges associated to a vision where the network slicing concept is applied with a much greater level of granularity, ultimately allowing it to become a core mechanism of the network’s operation, with large numbers of co-existing slices. In that respect, this paper proposes an architecture framework for instantiation of network slices among network providers, which in turn are able to instantiate sub-slices tailored to use cases and vertical tenants. The evaluation of this concept is done following a two-pronged approach: firstly, different slice dimensions (i.e., from micro to macro) are proposed and discussed, pointing out the benefits and challenges of each proposed slice; secondly, we deployed a mobile network provider (MNO), using OpenAirInterface and FlexRAN frameworks, and experimentally evaluated the its slicing mechanisms. The objective is to provide insight on the challenges and impact associated with the deployment of an increasing amount of slices, using the same available infra-structural resources.


Network slicing SDN NFV 



This work is funded by FCT/MEC through national funds and when applicable co-funded by FEDER PT2020 partnership agreement under the Project PTDC/EEI-TEL/30685/2017, and by the Integrated Programme of SR&TD SOCA (Ref. CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000010), co-funded by Centro 2020 program, Portugal 2020, European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund. The experimental validation of this work included usage of the FlexRAN software from “Mosaic-5G”, a EURECOM registered trademark (INPI No. 17 4 357 904).


  1. 1.
    Logota, E., Corujo, D., Jeon, S., Rodriguez, J., & Aguiar, R. L. (2015). The 5G Internet. In J. Rodriguez (Ed.), Fundamentals of 5G mobile networks,
  2. 2.
    Foukas, X., Patounas, G., Elmokashfi, A., & Marina, M. K. (2017). Network slicing in 5G: Survey and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(5), 94–100. Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). Network functions virtualisation (2012). Accessed Mar 2019.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., & Turner, J. (2008). OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69–74. Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    How many network slices are needed? Accessed October 6, 2018, from
  8. 8.
    Richart, M., Baliosian, J., Serrat, J., & Gorricho, J. L. (2016). Resource slicing in virtual wireless networks: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 13(3), 462–476. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Q., Alcaraz-Calero, J., Weiss, M. B., Gavras, A., Neves, P. M., Cale, R., Bernini, G., Carrozzo, G., Ciulli, N., Celozzi, G., et al. (2018). In 2018 IEEE international symposium on broadband multimedia systems and broadcasting (BMSB) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de la Oliva, A., Li, X., Costa-Perez, X., Bernardos, C. J., Bertin, P., Iovanna, P., et al. (2018). 5G-TRANSFORMER: Slicing and orchestrating transport networks for industry verticals. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(8), 78–84. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaki, Y., Zhao, L., Goerg, C., & Timm-Giel, A. (2010). In 2010 Third joint IFIP wireless and mobile networking conference (WMNC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van De Belt, J., Ahmadi, H., & Doyle, L. E. (2014). In 2014 IEEE 80th vehicular technology conference (VTC fall) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamel, M. I., Le, L. B., & Girard, A. (2014). In 2014 IEEE 80th vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pérez-Romero, J., Sallent, O., Ferrús, R., & Agustí, R. (2018). In NOMS 2018–2018 IEEE/IFIP network operations and management symposium (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sallent, O., Perez-Romero, J., Ferrus, R., & Agusti, R. (2017). On radio access network slicing from a radio resource management perspective. IEEE Wireless Communications, 24(5), 166–174. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakauchi, K., Shoji, Y., & Nishinaga, N. (2012). In 2012 Fourth international conference on ubiquitous and future networks (ICUFN) (pp. 166–169). IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Derakhshani, M., Wang, X., Le-Ngoc, T., & Leon-Garcia, A. (2015). arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.03554.
  18. 18.
    Guo, K., Sanadhya, S., & Woo, T. (2014). ViFi: Virtualizing WLAN using commodity hardware. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM workshop on Mobility in the evolving internet architecture (MobiArch '14) (pp. 25–30). New York: ACM.
  19. 19.
    Koutlia, K., Umbert, A., Garcia, S., & Casadevall, F. (2017). In 2017 IEEE conference on network softwarization (NetSoft) (pp. 1–2). IEEE.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, G., Chaturvedi, A., Mishra, A., & Banerjee, S. (2007). In Proceedings of the second ACM international workshop on wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation and characterization (pp. 75–82). ACM.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xia, L., Kumar, S., Yang, X., Gopalakrishnan, P., Liu, Y., Schoenberg, S., & Guo, X. (2011). Virtual WiFi: Bring virtualization from wired to wireless. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS international conference on Virtual execution environments (VEE '11) (pp. 181–192). New York: ACM.
  22. 22.
    Mahindra, R., Bhanage, G., Hadjichristofi, G., Seskar, I., Raychaudhuri, D., & Zhang, Y. (2008). In Next generation internet networks, 2008. NGI 2008 (pp. 215–222). IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meneses, F., Corujo, D., Neto, A., & Aguiar, R. L. (2018). In Workshop on mobility support in slice-based network control for heterogeneous environments (MOBISLICE) (IEEE NFV-SDN workshops). IEEE.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gudipati, A., Perry, D., Li, L. E., & Katti, S. (2013). In Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking (pp. 25–30). ACM.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Wang, P., & Lin, S. C. (2015). SoftAir: A software defined networking architecture for 5G wireless systems. Computer Networks, 85, 1–18. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nikaein, N., Knopp, R., Kaltenberger, F., Gauthier, L., Bonnet, C., Nussbaum, D., & Ghaddab, R. (2014). In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking (pp. 305–308). ACM.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nikaein, N., Chang, C. Y., & Alexandris, K. (2018). Mosaic5G: Agile and flexible service platforms for 5G research. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 48(3), 29–34. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huang, A., Nikaein, N., Stenbock, T., Ksentini, A., & Bonnet, C. (2017). In 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Foukas, X., Nikaein, N., Kassem, M. M., Marina, M. K., & Kontovasilis, K. (2016). In Proceedings of the 12th international on conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies (pp. 427–441). ACM.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, Q., Alcaraz-Calero, J., Weiss, M. B., Gavras, A., Neves, P. M., Cale, R., Bernini, G., Carrozzo, G., Ciulli, N., Celozzi, G., Ciriaco, A., Levin, A., Lorenz, D., Barabash, K., Nikaein, N., Spadaro, S., Morris, D., Chochliouros, J., Agapiou, Y., Patachia, C., Iordache, M., Oproiu, E., Lomba, C., Aleixo, A. C., Ro-Drigues, A., Hallissey, G., Bozakov, Z., Koutsopoulos, K., & Walsh, P. (2018). In 2018 IEEE international symposium on broadband multimedia systems and broadcasting (BMSB) (pp. 1–5).
  31. 31.
    Meneses, F., Silva, R., Santos, D., Corujo, D., & Aguiar, R. L. (2018). In 29th Annual international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC). IEEE.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarkar, S., Becker, C., Kunz, J., Sarbhai, A., Annasamymani, G., Kasera, S. K., & Van der Merwe, J. (2017). Enabling WiFi in open access networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on hot topics in wireless (HotWireless '17) (pp. 13–17). New York: ACM.
  33. 33.
    FlexRAN. Accessed September 30, 2018, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Telecomunicações and Universidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations