Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of ICI Self Cancellation Techniques for Wavelet OFDM Under Different Channels in Simulink

  • Navdeep KaurEmail author
  • Naresh Kumar
Article

Abstract

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) has found its place in many applications due to its advantages like robustness to channel fading,spectral efficiency and high data rate. Long Term Evolution and Wi-Fi utilises OFDM. Some practical limitations faced by OFDM are Inter carrier Interference(ICI) and Peak to Average Power Ratio(PAPR). Many schemes to combat the ICI and PAPR are available. In this paper, we analyze the different ICI self cancellation techniques proposed in literature. Further, these techniques are integrated with wavelet based OFDM. ICI Self Cancellation techniques for wavelet OFDM are compared under different channels using Simulink.

Keywords

Carrier frequency offset (CFO) Discrete wavelet transform (DWT) Inter carrier interference (ICI) Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) Quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Weinstein, S., & Ebert, P. (1971). Data transmission by frequency-division multiplexing using the discrete fourier transform. IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, 19(5), 628–634.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1971.1090705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veena, M. B., & Swamy, M. N. S. (2011). Performance analysis of DWT based OFDM over FFT based OFDM and implementing on FPGA. International Journal of VLSI Design and Communication Systems (VLSICS), 2(3), 119–130.  https://doi.org/10.5121/vlsic.2011.2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 46.
    Côme, B., Ness, R., Donnay, S., Van der Perre, L., Eberle, W., Wambacq, P., et al. (2001). Impact of front end non-idelaities on bit error rate performance of WLAN-OFDM transceivers. Microwave Journal, 44(2), 126–140.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sathananthan, K., Rajatheva, R. M. A. P., & Slimane, S. B. (2000). Cancellation technique to reduce intercarrier interference in OFDM. IEEE Electronics Letters, 36(25), 2078–2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao, Y., & Häggman, S. G. (2001). Intercarrier interference self-cancellation scheme for OFDM mobile communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 49, 1185–1191.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fu, Y., Kang, S. G., & Ko, C. C. (2002). A new scheme for PAPR reduction in OFDM systems with ICI self-cancellation. In Proceedings IEEE 56th vehicular technology conference (Vol. 3, pp. 1418–1421).  https://doi.org/10.1109/vetecf.2002.1040449.
  7. 7.
    Sathananthan, K., Athaudage, C. R. N., & Qiu, B. (2004) A novel ICI cancellation scheme to reduce both frequency offset and IQ imbalance effects in OFDM. In Proceedings of ninth international symposium on computers and communications, ISCC 2004 (IEEE Cat. No. 04TH8769) (Vol. 2, pp. 708–713).  https://doi.org/10.1109/iscc.2004.1358623.
  8. 8.
    Singh, H., Sarowa, S., Agrawal, S., (2015) A novel hybrid ICI cancellation technique for OFDM optimization. In IEEE international conference (RAECS) (pp. 1–5).  https://doi.org/10.1109/raecs.2015.7453374.
  9. 9.
    Sarowa, S., Singh, H., Agrawal, S., & Sohi, B. S. (2017). A novel energy efficient ICI cancellation technique for bandwidth improvements through cyclic prefix reuse in the OFDM system. Springer Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronics Engineering, 18, 1892–1899.  https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sarowa, S., Singh, H., Agrawal, S., & Sohi, B. S. (2017). Design of a novel hybrid ICI mitigation technique through wavelet implication in OFDM system. Digital Communications and Networks, 4, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2017.09.008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh, P., & Sahu, O. P. (2015). An overview of ICI self cancellation techniques in OFDM systems. In IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and communication technology (pp. 299–302), Ghaziabad.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cict.2015.113.
  12. 12.
    Abshir, A. G., Abdullahi, M. M., & Samad, A. (2014). A comparative study of carrier frequency offset (CFO) estimation techniques for OFDM systems. IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 9(4), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar, N., Kaur, G., & Sohi, B. S. (2015). Comparative analysis of various inter-carrier interference cancellation methods. International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies, 5(3), 18–32.  https://doi.org/10.5815/ijwmt.2015.03.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lakshmanan, M. K., & Nikookar, H. (2006). A review of wavelets for digital wireless communication. Wireless Personal Communication, 37(3–4), 387–420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-006-9077-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hariprasad, N., Sundari, G., (2015) Comparative analysis of the BER performance of DWT OFDM over that of FFT OFDM in presence of phase noise. In International conference on robotics, automation, control and embedded systems (RACE) (pp. 1–4) Chennai.  https://doi.org/10.1109/race.2015.7097288.
  16. 16.
    Jhingan, A., & Kansal, L. (2016). Performance Evaluation for Wavelet based OFDM system effected by CFO over Rayleigh channel. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(5), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i5/79038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anuradha, & Kumar, N. (2014). BER analysis of conventional and wavelet based OFDM in LTE using different modulation techniques. Recent Advances in Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS).  https://doi.org/10.1109/raecs.2014.6799622.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, N., & Sohi, B. S. (2016). Evaluation of conventional and wavelet based OFDM System for ICI cancellation. Wireless Personal Communication, 91(3), 1435–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3537-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupta, D., Vats, V. B., & Garg, K. K. (2008) Performance analysis of DFT-OFDM, DCT-OFDM, and DWT-OFDM systems in AWGN channel. In The fourth international conference on wireless and mobile communications (pp. 214–216), Athens.  https://doi.org/10.1109/icwmc.2008.66.
  20. 20.
    Ranjana, R. P. G., & Hariprasad, N. (2015). Performance analysis of DWT based OFDM for WiMAX. In International conference on innovation information in computing technologies (pp. 1–8), Chennai.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iciict.2015.7396087.
  21. 21.
    Agarwal, A., & Agarwal, K. (2015). Implementation and performance evaluation of OFDM system in diverse transmission channel using Simulink. American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3(5), 117–123.  https://doi.org/10.12691/ajeee-3-5-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manjunatha, K., Reshma, M. (2017). Comparative study on DWT-OFDM and FFT-OFDM simulation using Matlab/Simulink. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 43(5).  https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v43p250.
  23. 23.
    Kaur, N., & Kumar, N. (2017) Review and analysis of Simulink based OFDM. 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication & Automation (ICACCA) (pp. 1–5). (Fall), Dehradun.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCAF.2017.8344664.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Institute of Engineering and Technology (UIET)Panjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations