Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 104, Issue 3, pp 1037–1064 | Cite as

Design of Green Smart Room Using Fifth Generation Network Device Femtolet

  • Priti Deb
  • Anwesha Mukherjee
  • Debashis DeEmail author
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Designing smart room with energy-efficient data and application offloading facilities for the users is a crucial issue. This paper has proposed the architecture of a self-organized smart room where the users can offload their data and applications at low power and low latency. Sensors and detectors are used to collect status of the objects present in the room and according to the collected information, the microcontroller operates other devices e.g. lights, AC, smoke detector etc. located inside the room in order to create a self-organized environment. In the proposed architecture fifth generation network device Femtolet is used as a small home base station with cloud environment. The proposed smart room architecture is implemented using network simulator Qualnet version 7 and its performance is evaluated with respect to energy consumption, carried load, delay, jitter and throughput. The simulation results show that Femtolet reduces the energy consumption and delay in accessing cloud services by approximately 14–57% and 8–35% respectively than the femtocell base station to build a green smart home environment.

Keywords

Femtolet Smart room Power Sensors Microcontroller 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Department of Science and Technology (DST) for DST-FIST Reference No.: SR/FST/ETI-296/2011.

References

  1. 1.
    Sang, Y. J., Hwang, H. G., & Kim, K. S. (2009). A self-organized femtocell for IEEE 802.16 e system. In Global telecommunications conference, 2009. GLOBECOM 2009. IEEE (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meng, X., Yan, L., Rui, L., Gao, Z., & Qiu, X. S. (2009). A policy-based self-configuration management mechanism for home NodeB. In 15th Asia-Pacific conference on communications, 2009. APCC 2009 (pp. 778–781). IEEE.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rashidi, P., Cook, D. J., Holder, L. B., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2011). Discovering activities to recognize and track in a smart environment. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(4), 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mukherjee, A., Bhattacherjee, S., Pal, S., & De, D. (2013). Femtocell based green power consumption methods for mobile network. Computer Networks, 57(1), 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mukherjee, A., De, D., & Deb, P. (2016). Interference management in macro-femtocell and micro-femtocell cluster-based long-term evaluation-advanced green mobile network. IET Communications, 10(5), 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ro, J. H., Lee, E. H., & Song, H. K. (2017). Adaptive femtocell design scheme in mobile communication systems. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(1), 811–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2014). A cost-effective location tracking strategy for femtocell based mobile network. In 2014 International conference on control, instrumentation, energy and communication (CIEC) (pp. 533–537). IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2013). Congestion detection, prevention and avoidance strategies for an intelligent, energy and spectrum efficient green mobile network. Journal of Computational Intelligence and Electronic Systems, 2(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2016). Femtolet: A novel fifth generation network device for green mobile cloud computing. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 62, 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., & Davies, N. (2009). The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(4), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duro, F. R., Blas, J. G., Higuero, D., Perez, O., & Carretero, J. (2015). CoSMiC: A hierarchical cloudlet-based storage architecture for mobile clouds. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 50, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Munoz, O., Pascual-Iserte, A., & Vidal, J. (2013). Joint allocation of radio and computational resources in wireless application offloading. In Future network and mobile summit (FutureNetworkSummit), 2013 (pp. 1–10). IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barbarossa, S., Sardellitti, S., & Di Lorenzo, P. (2014). Communicating while computing: Distributed mobile cloud computing over 5G heterogeneous networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 31(6), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lobillo, F., Becvar, Z., Puente, M. A., Mach, P., Presti, F. L., Gambetti, F., et al. (2014). An architecture for mobile computation offloading on cloud-enabled LTE small cells. In Wireless communications and networking conference workshops (WCNCW) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Busso, C., Hernanz, S., Chu, C. W., Kwon, S. I., Lee, S., Georgiou, P. G., et al. (2005). Smart room: Participant and speaker localization and identification. In Proceedings (ICASSP’05). IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 2005 (Vol. 2, pp. 2–1117). IEEE.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pnevmatikakis, A. (2017). Recognising daily functioning activities in smart homes. Wireless Personal Communications, 96(3), 3639–3654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ye, J., Stevenson, G., & Dobson, S. (2011). A top-level ontology for smart environments. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 7(3), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moncrieff, S., Venkatesh, S., West, G., & Greenhill, S. (2007). Multi-modal emotive computing in a smart house environment. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 3(2), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luhr, S., West, G., & Venkatesh, S. (2007). Recognition of emergent human behaviour in a smart home: A data mining approach. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 3(2), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dhurgadevi, M., & Devi, P. M. (2018). An analysis of energy efficiency improvement through wireless energy transfer in wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 98(4), 3377–3391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maciuca, A., Popescu, D., Strutu, M., & Stamatescu, G. (2013). Wireless sensor network based on multilevel femtocells for home monitoring. In IEEE seventh international conference on intelligent data acquisition and advanced computing systems (pp. 499–503). IEEE.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haiwen, Y., & Dawei, D. (2017). Development of a wireless sensor network with optical electric sensor for electric field measurement. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(2), 2191–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hong, X., Nugent, C., Mulvenna, M., McClean, S., Scotney, B., & Devlin, S. (2009). Evidential fusion of sensor data for activity recognition in smart homes. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(3), 236–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang, Y., Chen, R., & Wang, D. C. (2015). A survey of mobile cloud computing applications: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Personal Communications, 80(4), 1607–1623.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shi, T., Yang, M., Li, X., Lei, Q., & Jiang, Y. (2016). An energy-efficient scheduling scheme for time-constrained tasks in local mobile clouds. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 27, 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kwon, Y., Yi, H., Kwon, D., Yang, S., Cho, Y., & Paek, Y. (2016). Precise execution offloading for applications with dynamic behavior in mobile cloud computing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 27, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miao, M., Wang, J., Li, H., & Chen, X. (2015). Secure multi-server-aided data deduplication in cloud computing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 24, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang, Y., Zhu, H., Lu, H., Weng, J., Zhang, Y., & Choo, K. K. R. (2016). Cloud based data sharing with fine-grained proxy re-encryption. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 28, 122–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2016). Low power offloading strategy for femto-cloud mobile network. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 19(1), 260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    De, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2015). Femto-cloud based secure and economic distributed diagnosis and home health care system. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 5(3), 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    De, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). Femtocell based economic health monitoring scheme using mobile cloud computing. In Advance computing conference (IACC), 2014 IEEE International (pp. 385–390). IEEE.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2014). Femtocell based green health monitoring strategy. In General assembly and scientific symposium (URSI GASS), 2014 XXXIth URSI (pp. 1–4). IEEE.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mukherjee, A., Gupta, P., & De, D. (2014). Mobile cloud computing based energy efficient offloading strategies for femtocell network. In Applications and innovations in mobile computing (AIMoC), 2014 (pp. 28–35). IEEE.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cook, D., & Das, S. K. (2004). Smart environments: Technology, protocols and applications (Vol. 43). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ashraf, I., Ho, L. T., & Claussen, H. (2010). Improving energy efficiency of femtocell base stations via user activity detection. In Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2010 IEEE (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu, C. P., Faryar, A., & Huber, K. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,798,017. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li, W., & Lu, E. Q. (2014). Design of Femtocell-based smart home system gateway. In P. Yarlagadda & S.-B. Choi (Eds.), Applied mechanics and materials (Vol. 530, pp. 662–666). Trans Tech Publications.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Akinlabi, O. A., Paul, B. S., Joseph, M. K., & Ferreira, H. C. (2015). Indoor communication: Femtocell behavior in an indoor environment. In Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists, Hong Kong (Vol. 2).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Czaja, S., & Afsar, M. (2017). U.S. Patent No. 9,674,759. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gavrilovska, L., Rakovic, V., & Atanasovski, V. (2016). Visions towards 5G: Technical requirements and potential enablers. Wireless Personal Communications, 87(3), 731–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chih-Lin, I., Han, S., Xu, Z., Sun, Q., & Pan, Z. (2016). 5G: Rethink mobile communications for 2020+. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374(2062), 20140432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Hu, L., Taleb, T., & Sheng, Z. (2015). Cloud-based wireless network: Virtualized, reconfigurable, smart wireless network to enable 5G technologies. Mobile Networks and Applications, 20(6), 704–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Okabe, J., & Matsuyama, T. (2005). U.S. Patent No. 6,970,085. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Uchida, R., Yamasaki, T., Mimura, M., Hasimoto, K., & Kawabe, S. (1982). U.S. Patent No. 4,329,636. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Park, Y. S., Lee, Y. H., & Park, S. H. (2002). U.S. Patent No. 6,490,455. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xia, Y. (1996). U.S. Patent No. 5,489,827. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringMaulana Abul Kalam Azad University of TechnologyKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Engineering and ManagementKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations