Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 2475–2499 | Cite as

Instrumentation Location Diversity Paradigm for Future Astronomy Observations

  • A. A. PeriolaEmail author
  • O. E. Falowo


Capital constrained organizations desiring to conduct astronomy observations face significant challenges due to the high cost of acquiring telescopes and computing facilities. Approaches such as re-using discarded earth stations can reduce telescope acquisition costs. In addition, an increasing population also reduces land suitability and availability for establishing radio quiet zones. These challenges affect the ability of capital constrained astronomy organizations in high population density regions to conduct astronomy observations. This paper proposes the use of drones to address these challenges. Drone based telescopes and computing systems in the airspace are less reliant on land resources. They can be used to conduct astronomy observations in high population regions. The paper presents the architecture of the drone based astronomy system and discusses relations between the drone and terrestrial astronomy systems. The performance benefits of the proposed architecture are investigated by formulating a model and conducing numerical simulation. It can be seen that using the proposed architecture reduces ownership costs by up to 51.2% on average and improves the power efficiency by up to 33% on average. In addition, the use of the proposed drone based telescope architecture enhances the angular resolution by 74.3% on average.


Low cost astronomy High performance computing facilities Drones Stratospheric platforms Satellite 



  1. 1.
    Cordes, J. The square kilometre array. [Online] Accessed Accessed 13 Jan 2018.
  2. 2.
    Ros, E., Schwarz, D. J., & Vocks, C. Community Paper “Radio astronomy infrastructures”. Strategy paper for the Memorandum (Denkschrift) “Perspectives of Astrophysics in Germany 2017–2030” of the German Council of Observatories, [Online],; Accessed 09 March 2018.
  3. 3.
    Haynes, M. Discovering dusty galaxies—submillimeter astronomy in the chajnantor: The atacama large millimetre array: ALMA and CCAT-prime, July 7, 2016. [Online] Accessed Accessed 13 Jan 2018.
  4. 4.
    Wootten, A., Lo, K. Y., Russell, A., Webber, J. C., Lonsdale, C., Hibbard, J., et al. The Atacama Large Millimetre/Submillimeter Arrat Development Program: Activity White Paper for Astro 2010 Program Prioritization Panel. [Online] Accessed Accessed 13 Jan 2018.
  5. 5.
    Periola, A. A., & Falowo, O. E. (2016). Intelligent cognitive radio models for enhancing future radio astronomy observations. Advances in Astronomy. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guimaraes, V. T., Rendon, O. C., dos Santos, G. L., Rodrigues, G., Freitas, C. M. D. S., Tarouco, L. M. R., et al. Improving productivity and reducing cost through the use of visualizations for SDN management. In Proceedings—IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. 2016 (ISCC), Messina, Italy, June 27–30, 2016 (pp. 531–538).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balcas, J., Hendricks, T. W., Keira, D., Mughal, A., Newman, H., Spiropulu, M., et al. (2017). SDN-NGenIA, a software defined next generation integrated architecture for HEP and data intensive science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 898(9), 1–8. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pankratius, V., & Mattmann, C. (2014). Computing in astronomy: To see the unseen. Computer, 47(7), 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Telecommunications Union, ‘Characteristics of Radio Quiet Zones—Report ITU-R RA.2259 (09/2012) RA Series, Radio Astronomy’.Google Scholar
  10. 10. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.
  11. 11.
    Netshishivhe, S. (2014). The Karoo Fracking Scenario: Can Development and Environmental Wellbeing Coexist, or Must One of Them Prevail. Africa Institute of South Africa, Briefing No 109 (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    AbRahman, A. A., Maulud, K. N. A., Mohd, F. A., Jaafar, O., & Tahar, K. N. (2017). Volumetric calculation using low cost unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) approach. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 270, 012032. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Probst, L., Frideres, L., Petersen, B., & Diaz, C. M. (2015). Space Enabled applications—UAV systems for civilian applications-Case Study 5B. European Union.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watts, A. C., Ambrosia, V. G., & Hinkley, E. A. (2012). Unmanned Aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: Classification and considerations of use. Remote Sensing, 4, 1671–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hartley, R. (2017). Unmanned aerial vehicles in forestry—Reaching for a new perspective. NZ Journal of Forestry, 62(1), 31–39.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elias, B. Unmanned aircraft operations in domestic airspace: US policy perspectives and the regulatory landscape. Congressional Research Service Report, Jan 27, 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kesh, J. A Quadcopter Drone Could Soon be Exploring Saturn’s Moon Titan. [Online] Accessed Accessed 13 Jan 2018.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Royo, P., Pastor, E., Barrado, C., Cuadrado, R., Barrao, F. & Garcia, A. (2017) Hardware design of a small UAS helicopter for remote sensing operations. Drones, 1(1), 1–25. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fernandez, M. G., Lopez, Y. A., Arboleya, A., Valdes, B. G., Vaqueiro, Y. R., Gomez, M. E. D. C., et al. (2017). Antenna diagnostics and characterization using unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Access, 5, 23563–23575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Foo, Y. W., Goh, C., & Li, Y. Machine learning with sensitivity analysis to determine key factors contributing to energy consumption in cloud data centres. In International conference on cloud computing research and innovations, May 4–5, 2016, Singapore (pp. 107–113).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Chapman, G. Facebook moves ahead toward internet drone air fleet. phys.orgGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., & Debbah, M. Mobile unmanned aerial vehicles for energy-efficient internet of things communications. [Online]. arXiv: 1703.05401v2 [cs.IT]. Accessed Sep 12, 2017.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Djorgovski, S. G. (2002). The roles of small telescopes in a virtual observatory environment. In T. Oswald (Ed.), Small telescopes in the new Millennium I. Perceptions, productivity and priorities (p. 85). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilson, T. L. Introduction to millimetre/sub-millimetre astronomy. arXiv: 0903.0562v1 [astro-ph.GA], March 3, 2009 (pp. 1–106).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vergouw, B., Nagel, H., Bondt, G., & Custers, B. (2016). Chapter 2 drone technology: Types, payloads, applications, frequency spectrum issues and future developments. In B. Custers (Ed.), The future of drone use, information technology and law series 27 (pp. 21–45). Springer Product of T.M.C. Asser Press; Netherlands. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loeb, A. (2014). On the benefits of promoting diversity of ideas. Nature Physics, 10, 616–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    ARCA Press Release. AirStrato The most amazing air robot in the world. Nov 25, 2014. [Online]
  32. 32. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical, Electronics and Computer EngineeringBells University of Technology OttaOttaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations