Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 100, Issue 1, pp 7–23 | Cite as

Co-tier Uplink Interference Management by Stackelberg Game with Pricing in Co-channel Femtocell Networks

Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the development of the femtocell technologies, the indoor signal quality of the mobile communications is greatly improved. However, as the femtocells are widely deployed, the uplink interference from different femtocells, i.e. the co-tier uplink interference, turns out to be a critical problem to jeopardize the performance of the femtocell networks. To tackle this problem, the concept of Stackelberg game with pricing mechanism is employed. In this game, given a maximum co-tier uplink interference that the leader can tolerate, the optimum price to maximize the utility of the leader and the optimum transmission power to maximize the utility of the followers are determined by a distributed bargaining procedure. Based on the numerical results, we first show that the distributed bargaining procedure is effective and efficient in determining the optimum price and the optimum transmission power. In addition, we also conclude that the total network capacity can be improved on condition that leader can tolerate larger amount of co-tier uplink interference from the followers.

Keywords

Femtocell networks Co-tier uplink interference Pricing Distributed bargaining procedure Stackelberg game 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Prof. Hwang-Cheng Wang, Prof. Fang-Chang Kuo, and Prof. Kuo-Chang Ting for their valuable suggestions to improve this paper. Furthermore, the authors would also like to thank Ms. Shih-Han Lo for her help in generating high-resolution figures in Sect. 4. This paper was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant Numbers 101-2221-E-197-022, 104-2221-E-197-009, and 105-2221-E-197-003. Preliminary results of this work were published in VITAE 2014.

References

  1. 1.
    Cisco. (2017). Cisco visual networking index: Globe mobile data traffic forecast update. 2016–2021 White paper. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white-paper-c11-520862.html.
  2. 2.
    Chandrasekhar, V., Andrews, J. G., & Gatherer, A. (2008). Femtocell networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46(9), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ABI Research. (2017). In-building mobile data traffic forecast, 4Q 2015. https://www.abiresearch.com/market-research/product/1023888-in-building-mobile-data-traffic-forecast/.
  4. 4.
    ABI Research. (2017). ABI research anticipates in-building mobile data traffic to grow by more than 600% by 2020, Jan. 11 2016. https://www.abiresearch.com/press/abi-research-anticipates-building-mobile-data-traf/.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Altman, E., Boulogne, T., & El-Azouzi, R. (2006). A survey on networking games in telecommunications. Computers & Operations Research, 33(2), 286–311.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felegyhazi, M., & Hubaux, J. P. Game theory in wireless networks: A tutorial, EPFL technical report: LCA-REPORT-2006-002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antoniou, J., & Pitsillides, A. (2016). Game theory in communication networks: Cooperative resolution of interactive networking scenarios. Boca Raton: CRC Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benslama, M., Boucenna, M. L., & Batatia, H. (2015). Ad hoc networks telecommunications and game theory. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamidouche, K., Saad, W., & Debbah, M. (2016). A multi-game framework for harmonized LTE-U and WiFi coexistence over unlicensed bands. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 23(6), 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wei, L., Sarwat, A., Saad, W., & Biswas, A. (2016). Stochastic games for power grid protection against coordinated cyber-physical attacks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2016.2561266.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tseng, C.-C., Wang, H.-C., Ting, K.-C., Wang, C.-C., & Kuo, F.-C. (2017). Fast game-based handoff mechanism with load balancing for LTE/LTE-A heterogeneous networks. Journal of Network and Computer Application, 85(3), 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin, S., Ni, W., Tian, H., & Liu, R. P. (2015). An evolutionary game theoretic framework for femtocell radio resource management. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(11), 6356–6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chandrasekhar, V., Andrews, J. G., Muharemovic, T., Shen, Z., & Gatherer, A. (2009). Power control in two-tier femtocell networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(8), 4316–4328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jo, H.-S., Mun, C., Moon, J., & Yook, J.-G. (2009). Interference mitigation using uplink power control for two-tier femtocell networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(10), 4906–4910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tseng, C.-C., Wang, H.-C., Ting, K.-C., Tsai, Y.-F., & Kuo, F.-C. (2017). Mitigating uplink Interference in femto-macro coexisted heterogeneous network by using power control. Wireless Personal Communications, 95(1), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kang, X., Zhang, R., & Motani, M. (2012). Price-based resource allocation for spectrum-sharing femtocell networks: A stackelberg game approach. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30(3), 538–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Ilan UniversityYilan CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations