Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 97, Issue 3, pp 4621–4630 | Cite as

Satellite Image Change Detection Using Laplacian–Gaussian Distributions

  • M. N. SumaiyaEmail author
  • R. Shantha Selva Kumari
Article
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, Bayesian based change detection (CD) algorithm is proposed for satellite images, using prevalent probability distributions in spatial domain. The log ratio difference image (DI) is generated from two images acquired over the same area at different time instants. DI is clustered into two classes namely changed and unchanged using K-means clustering for basic discrimination. For further progress, changed pixels are modeled with Laplacian probability density function (pdf) whereas, unchanged pixels with Gaussian pdf. Expressions are derived for the parameters of pdfs using iterative free negative order fractional moments in order to avoid convergence problems. Binary CD map is generated using Bayesian threshold. Experimental results show that the proposed method is effective by achieving better performance in terms of false alarm as 2.3% and overall accuracy as 97.7% in less computing time compared with the state-of-the-art methods.

Keywords

Synthetic aperture radar images Optical images Change detection Bayesian distributions Negative order fractional moments 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We express our sincere thanks to Dr. T. Celik, university of the Witwatersrand, South Africa for providing his algorithm results.

References

  1. 1.
    Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 2365–2401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oliver, C., & Quegan, S. (1998). Understanding synthetic aperture radar images. Boston: Artech House.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bazi, Y., Bruzzone, L., & Melgani, F. (2005). An unsupervised approach based on the generalized Gaussian model to automatic change detection in multitemporal SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(4), 874–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Celik, T. (2009). Unsupervised change detection in satellite images using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 6(4), 772–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Celik, T. (2010). A Bayesian approach to unsupervised multiscale change detection in synthetic aperture radar images. Signal Processing, 90(5), 1471–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuruoglu, E. E., & Zerubia, J. (2004). Modeling SAR images with a generalization of the Rayleigh distribution. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, H.-C., Celik, T., Longbotham, N., & Emery, W. J. (2015). Gabor feature based unsupervised change detection of multitemporal sar images based on two-level clustering. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(12), 2458–2462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zanetti, M., Bovolo, F., & Bruzzone, L. (2015). Rayleigh-Rice mixture parameter estimation via em algorithm for change detection in multispectral images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 24(12), 5004–5016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bazi, Y., Melgani, F., & Al-Sharari, H. D. (2010). Unsupervised change detection in multispectral remotely sensed imagery with level set methods. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(8), 3178–3187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gong, M., Li, Y., Jiao, L., Jia, M., & Su, L. (2014). SAR change detection based on intensity and texture changes. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 93, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yousif, O., & Ban, Y. (2013). Improving urban change detection from multitemporal SAR images using PCA–NLM. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(4), 2032–2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Fan, Yan, Wu, Zhang, Qiang, Zhang, Peng, Li, Ming, & Yunlong, Lu. (2013). Unsupervised change detection on sar images using triplet markov field model. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10(4), 697–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doulgeris, A. P., & Eltoft, T. (2010). Scale mixture of gaussian modelling of polarimetric SAR data. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 1–13.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gradhsteyn, S. I., & Ryzhik, I. M. (1996). Table of integrals, series, and products. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electronics and Communication DepartmentMepco Schlenk Engineering CollegeSivakasiIndia

Personalised recommendations