Advertisement

Cost-efficient approximation algorithm for aggregation points planning in smart grid communications

  • Yue Li
  • Tianyu Wang
  • Shaowei WangEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Smart grid is in need of an efficient communication network to guarantee reliable two-way data transmission between the control center and smart meters (SMs). In this work, a software-defined networking (SDN) based smart grid communication (SGC) scheme is introduced to fulfill the information transmission requirement, where the control plane is separated from the data plane to support diverse services flexibly in the smart grid. In such an SDN-based SGC system, to guarantee effective data processing and forwarding between the SMs and the control center, aggregation points (APs) are introduced. These APs should be deployed in an optimal way so as to cut down the total capital expenditure of the SGC system. The total cost generally includes the transmission cost between APs and the control center as well as APs and SMs. The construction and maintenance cost of the APs is also included. An approximation algorithm is introduced in this paper. The algorithm can deal with the formulated intractable APs planning task and produce performance-guaranteed solutions with reasonable complexity. Experiments indicate that the proposed algorithm works well for geographical areas with different densities of SMs. Our proposal yields cost-efficient APs deployment scheme and sheds insight into the reduction of the capital expenditure of the SGC system.

Keywords

Aggregation point Approximation algorithm Smart grid communications Software defined network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would acknowledge the financial and data support from State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC). This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61671233, 61801208, 61931023), the Jiangsu Science Foundation (BK20170650), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (BX201700118, 2017M621712), the Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation (1701118B), and the open research fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory (2019D02).

References

  1. 1.
    Nghia Le, T., Chin, W. L., & Chen, H. H. (2017). Standardization and security for smart grid communications based on cognitive radio technologies: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19, 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li, Z., & Liang, Q. (2016). Capacity optimization in heterogeneous home area networks with application to smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65, 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan, Z., Kulkarni, P., Gormus, S., Efthymiou, C., Kalogridis, G., Sooriyabandara, M., et al. (2013). Smart grid communications: Overview of research challenges, solutions, and standardization activities. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vallejo, A., Zaballos, A., Selga, J. M., & Dalmau, J. (2012). Next-generation QoS control architectures for distribution smart grid communication networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aijaz, A., & Aghvami, A. H. (2015). PRMA-based cognitive machine-to-machine communications in smart grid networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64, 3608–3623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monteiro, V., Carmo, J. P., Pinto, J. G., & Afonso, J. L. (2016). A flexible infrastructure for dynamic power control of electric vehicle battery chargers. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65, 4535–4547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, K., Wang, Y., Zeng, D., & Guo, S. (2017). An SDN-based architecture for next-generation wireless networks. IEEE Wireless on Communication, 24, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thyagaturu, A. S., Dashti, Y., & Reisslein, M. (2016). SDN-based smart gateways (Sm-GWs) for multi-operator small cell network management. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 13, 740–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bartoli, A., Hernandez-Serrano, J., Soriano, M., Dohler, M., Kountouris, A., & Barthel, D. (2011). Secure lossless aggregation over fading and shadowing channels for smart grid M2M networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2, 844–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ringwelski, M., Renner, C., Reinhardt, A., Weigel, A., & Turau, V. (2012). The Hitchhiker’s guide to choosing the compression algorithm for your smart meter data. In Proceedings of IEEE ENERGYCON’12 (pp. 935–940).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahmed, M. O., & Lampe, L. (2013). Power line communications for low-voltage power grid tomography. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 12, 5163–5175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jimenez, Y., Cervello-Pastor, C., & Garcia, A. J. (2014). On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer. In Proceedings of IFIP Networking’14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lange, S., Gebert, S., Zinner, T., Tran-Gia, P., Hock, D., Jarschel, M., et al. (2015). Optimal model for the controller placement problem in software defined networks. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 12, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sallahi, A., & St-Hilaire, M. (2017). Expansion model for the controller placement problem in software defined networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 21, 274–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu, Z., & Wen, Y. (2014). Distributed algorithm for tree-structured data aggregation service placement in smart grid. IEEE Systems Journal, 8, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aalamifar, F., Shirazi, G. N., Noori, M., & Lampe, L. (2014). Cost-efficient data aggregation point placement for advanced metering infrastructure. In Proceedings of IEEE SmartGridComm’14 (pp. 344–349).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang, X., & Wang, S. (2015). Aggregation points planning in smart grid communication system. IEEE Communications Letters, 19, 1315–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang, X., Wang, S., & Wang, C. (2015). Aggregation points planning for smart grid communications: Wired and wireless cases. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM’15.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang, X., & Ansari, N. (2017). Resource exchange in smart grid connected cooperative cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66, 6291–6298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zimmermann, M., & Dostert, K. (2002). A multipath model for the powerline channel. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 50, 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levi, R., Shmoys, D. B., & Swamy, C. (2012). LP-based approximation algorithms for capacitated facility location. Mathematical Programming, 131, 365–379.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grant, M., Boyd, S., & Ye, Y., (2009). CVX users’ guide. http://cvxr.com/cvx/doc. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  23. 23.
    Wang, S., & Huang, X. (2016). Aggregation points planning for software-defined network based smart grid communications. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’16.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shmoys, D. B., Tardos, É. & Aardal, K., (1997). Approximation algorithms for facility location problems (extended abstract). In Proceedings of ACM STOC’97 (pp. 265–274).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations