Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 5069–5081 | Cite as

Joint evaluation of imperfect SIC and fixed power allocation scheme for wireless powered D2D-NOMA networks with multiple antennas at base station

  • Chi-Bao Le
  • Dinh-Thuan DoEmail author
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, device-to-device (D2D) communication is exploited to adopt the proximity transmission among two nearby devices. The base station in this scenario transmits both information and energy to both D2D users to deploy wireless power transfer feature in green communications. In addition, to enhance the overall spectrum utilization of considered system, downlink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) network is considered to evaluate performance in such network. In particular, a downlink from the base station (BS) equipping multiple antennas is designed to robust performance. We further determine the worse case of considered NOMA at the receiver in cellular network as considering impact of imperfect successive interference cancellation (SIC). A two-user downlink NOMA scenario is considered, where a far user directly communicates with the BS without SIC, whereas a near user is assigned to serve D2D link with imperfects on SIC. The ergodic capacity of D2D NOMA is further analyzed under both perfect and imperfect SIC. The performance gap among two considered users in D2D NOMA network is demonstrated through simulation and analysis.

Keywords

Ergodic capacity Non-orthogonal multiple access Successive interference cancellation Downlink 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Dai, L., Wang, B., Yuan, Y., Han, S., Chih-Lin, I., & Wang, Z. (2015). Nonorthogonal multiple access for 5G: Solutions, challenges, opportunities, and future research trends. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(9), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhao, N., et al. (2019). Joint trajectory and precoding optimization for UAV-assisted NOMA networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 67(5), 3723–3735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding, Z., Lei, X., Karagiannidis, G. K., Schober, R., Yuan, J., & Bhargava, V. (2017). A survey on non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G networks: Research challenges and future trends. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35(10), 2181–2195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Islam, S. M. R., Avazov, N., Dobre, O. A., & Kwak, K.-S. (2017). Power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in 5G systems: Potentials and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 19(2), 721–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Islam, S. M. R., Zeng, M., & Dobre, O. A. (2017). NOMA in 5G systems: Exciting possibilities for enhancing spectral efficiency. IEEE 5G Tech Focus, 1(2), 1–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dinh-Thuan Do, H.-S., Nguyen, M. V., & Nguyen, T.-S. (2017). Wireless powered relaying networks under imperfect channel state information: System performance and optimal policy for instantaneous rate. Radioengineering, 26(3), 869–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen, X.-X., & Do, D.-T. (2017). Optimal power allocation and throughput performance of full-duplex DF relaying networks with wireless power transfer-aware channel. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2017, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nguyen, K.-T., Do, D.-T., Nguyen, X.-X., Nguyen, N.-T., & Ha, D.-H. (2015). Wireless information and power transfer for full duplex relaying networks: Performance analysis. In Proceedings of recent advances in electrical engineering and related sciences (AETA 2015) (pp. 53–62). Hanoi: HCMC.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen, X.-X., & Do, D.-T. (2017). Maximum harvested energy policy in full-duplex relaying networks with SWIPT. International Journal of Communication Systems, 30(17), e3359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao, N., Yu, F. R., Sun, H., & Li, M. (2016). Adaptive power allocation schemes for spectrum sharing in interference-alignment-based cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(5), 3700–3714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Do, D.-T. (2016). Energy-aware two-way relaying networks under imperfect hardware: Optimal throughput design and analysis. Telecommunication Systems, 62(2), 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen, T.-L., & Do, D.-T. (2018). Exploiting impacts of intercell interference on SWIPT-assisted non-orthogonal multiple access. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018, 12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Do, D.-T., & Le, C.-B. (2018). Application of NOMA in wireless system with wireless power transfer scheme: Outage and ergodic capacity performance analysis. Sensors, 18(10), 3501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Dinh-Thuan Do, M.-S., Nguyen, T.-A. H., & Voznak, M. (2019). NOMA-assisted multiple access scheme for IoT deployment: Relay selection model and secrecy performance improvement. Sensors, 19(3), 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mumtaz, S., Huq, K. M. S., & Rodriguez, J. (2014). Direct mobile-to-mobile communication: Paradigm for 5G. IEEE Wireless Communications, 21(5), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doppler, K., Rinne, M., Wijting, C., Ribeiro, C. B., & Hugl, K. (2009). Device-to-device communication as an underlay to LTE-advanced networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(12), 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lei, L., Zhong, Z., Lin, C., & Shen, X. (2012). Operator controlled deviceto-device communications in LTE-advanced networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 19(3), 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Asadi, A., & Mancuso, V. (2017). Network-assisted outband D2D-clustering in 5G cellular networks: Theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 16(8), 2246–2259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tseng, H.-W., Yu, Y.-J., Wu, B.-S., Kuo, C.-F., & Chen, P.-S. (May 2017). A resource allocation scheme for device-to-device communication over ultra-dense 5G cellular networks. In Proceedings of international conference on applied innovation (ICASI) (pp. 80–83).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ma, R., Chang, Y.-J., Chen, H.-H., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2017). On relay selection schemes for relay-assisted D2D communications in LTE-A systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(9), 8303–8314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tehrani, M. N., Uysal, M., & Yanikomeroglu, H. (2014). Device-to-device communication in 5G cellular networks: Challenges, solutions, and future directions. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5), 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lien, S.-Y., Chien, C.-C., Liu, G. S.-T., Tsai, H.-L., Li, R., & Wang, Y. J. (2016). Enhanced LTE device-to-device proximity services. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(12), 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Osseiran, A., et al. (2014). Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: The vision of the METIS project. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tullberg, H., et al. (2016). The METIS 5G system concept: Meeting the 5G requirements. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(12), 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Madani, N., & Sodagari, S. (2018). Performance analysis of non-orthogonal multiple access with underlaid device-to-device communication. IEEE Access, 6, 39820–39826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zheng, H., Hou, S., Li, H., Song, Z., & Hao, Y. (2018). Power allocation and user clustering for uplink MC-NOMA in D2D underlaid cellular networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 7(6), 1030–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Diao, X., Zheng, J., Wu, Y., & Cai, Y. (2019). Joint computing resource, power, and channel allocations for D2D-assisted and NOMA-based mobile edge computing. IEEE Access, 7, 9243–9257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao, N., Cao, Y., Yu, F. R., Chen, Y., Jin, M., & Leung, V. C. M. (2018). Artificial noise assisted secure interference networks with wireless power transfer. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(2), 1087–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hedayati, M., & Kim, I.-M. (2018). On the performance of NOMA in the two-user SWIPT system. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(11), 11258–11263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, H., et al. (2018). Energy-efficient resource allocation in NOMA heterogeneous networks with energy harvesting. In Proceedings of 2018 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 206–212).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Choi, M., Han, D., & Moon, J. (2018). Bi-directional cooperative NOMA without full CSIT. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(11), 7515–7527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Do, D.-T., & Van Nguyen, M.-S. (2019). Device-to-device transmission modes in NOMA network with and without wireless power transfer. Computer Communications, 139, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gradshteyn, S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2000). Table of integrals, series and products (6th ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City (IUH)Ho Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Wireless Communications Research Group, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations