Advertisement

Application research of game theory in cognitive radio spectrum allocation

  • Zhi-jun Teng
  • Lu-ying XieEmail author
  • Hao-lei Chen
  • Li-xin Teng
  • Hong-biao Li
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

To solve the user congestion problem in cognitive radio spectrum allocation process, this paper, based on the game theory spectrum allocation model, proposes an equilibrium spectrum allocation algorithm based on potential game theory to quickly reach the Nash equilibrium of the game process among cognitive users and the balanced allocation of users among multiple channels. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can achieve balanced allocation of cognitive users among channels, avoid excessive congestion of some channels and improve spectrum utilization. In addition, it can converge to Nash equilibrium in a short time. It can effectively improve the SIR and communication quality of the system.

Keywords

Cognitive radio Spectrum allocation Potential game theory SIR Spectrum utilization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve this paper. Besides, this work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Science Foundation Project (No. 61501107), “13th Five-Year” Scientific Research Planning Project of Jilin Province Department of Education (No. JJKH20180439KJ).

References

  1. 1.
    Bairagi, A. K., Abedin, S. F., Tran, N. H., Niyato, D., et al. (2018). QoE-enabled unlicensed spectrum sharing in 5G: A game-theoretic approach. IEEE Access, 6, 50538–50554.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dao, N. N., Lee, J., Vu, D. N., Paek, J., Kim, J., Cho, S., et al. (2017). Adaptive resource balancing for serviceability maximization in fog radio access networks. IEEE Access, 5(14), 548–14559.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, H. J., Qiu, Y., Long, K., Karagiannidis, G. K., Wang, X., & Nallanathan, A. (2018). Resource allocation in noma-based fog radio access networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 25(3), 110–115.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ning, Z. L., Wang, X. J., & Huang, J. (2019). Mobile edge computing-enabled 5 g vehicular networks toward the integration of communication and computing. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 14(1), 54–61.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xin, C. S., Paul, P., & Song, M. (2019). On dynamic spectrum allocation in geo-location spectrum sharing systems. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 18(4), 923–933.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang, Y. J. (2019). Dynamic resource allocation in mobile hetergeneous cellular networks. Wireless Networks, 25(4), 1605–1617.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bairagi, A. K., Tran, N. H., Saad, W., Han, Z., Hong, C. S., et al. (2019). A game-theoretic approach for fair coexistence between LTE-U and Wi-Fi systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(1), 442–455.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byun, S. S., & Gil, J. M. (2017). Fair dynamic spectrum allocation using modified game theory for resource-constrained cognitive wireless sensor networks. Symmetry, 9(5), 73.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khaliq, S. B., Amjad, M. F., Abbas, H., Shafqat, N., Afzal, H., et al. (2019). Defence against PUE attacks in ad hoc cognitive radio networks: A mean field game approach. Telecommunication Systems, 70(1), 123–140.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    He, Q., Zhu, L., & Mao, H. Q. (2016). A new spectrum allocation algorithm based on game theory in cognitive radio networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 21(2), 82–88.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, G., Li, B., Tan, X., Wang, X., et al. (2015). Adaptive power control algorithm in cognitive radio based on game theory. IET Communications, 9(15), 1807–1811.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lopez, O. L. A., Sanchez, S. M., Mafra, S. B., Fernandez, E. M., Brante, G., & Souza, R. D. (2018). Power control and relay selection in cognitive radio ad hoc networks using game theory. IEEE Systems Journal, 12(3), 2854–2865.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tao, Y. Z., Wu, C. Y., Huang, Y. Z., Zhang, P., et al. (2018). Aprojected gradient based game theoretic approach for multi-user power control in cognitive radionetwork. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19(3), 367–378.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, G., Li, B., Tan, X., Wang, X., et al. (2015). Adaptive power control algorithm in cognitive radio based on game theory. IET Communications, 9(15), 1807–1811.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meamari, E., Afhamisisi, K., & Shahhoseini, H. S. (2016). Game theory-based analysis on interactions among secondary and malicious users in coordinated jamming attack in cognitive radio systems. Journal of Circuits Systems & Computers, 25(8), 165–197.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, H. J., Du, J. L., Cheng, J. L., Long, K., Leung, V. C., et al. (2018). Incomplete CSI based resource optimization in SWIPT enabled heterogeneous networks: A non-cooperative game theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(3), 1882–1892.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, F., Lam, K. Y., Liu, X., Wang, J., Zhao, K., & Wang, L. (2018). Joint pricing and power allocation for multibeam satellite systems with dynamic game model. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(3), 2398–2408.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shokrnezhad, M., Khorsandi, S., et al. (2018). Joint power control and channel assignment in uplink IoT Networks: A non-cooperative game and auction based approach. Computer communications, 118, 1–13.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhong, X. D., Yin, H., He, Y. Z., Zhu, H., et al. (2019). Joint transmit power and bandwidth allocation for cognitive satellite network based on bargaining game theory. IEEE Access, 7, 6435–6449.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bistritz, I., Leshem, A., et al. (2019). Game theoretic dynamic channel allocation for frequency-selective interference channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 65(1), 330–353.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, Z. Y., Zhang, H. Y., Xu, N., et al. (2018). Channel assignment and power control based on stochastic learning game in cognitive radio networks. Acta Electronica Sinica, 46(12), 2870–2877.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ye, F., Dai, J., & Li, Y. B. (2018). Hybrid-clustering game Algorithm for resource allocation in macro-femto hetnet. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 12(4), 1638–1654.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ding, L., Melodia, T., Batalama, S. N., Matyjas, J. D., Medley, M. J., et al. (2010). Cross-layer routing and dynamic spectrum allocation in cognitive radio ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(4), 1969–1979.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, N., Zhang, S., Zheng, J., Fang, X., Mark, J. W., & Shen, X. (2017). QoE driven decentralized spectrum sharing in 5 g networks: Potential game approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(9), 7797–7808.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anghuwo, A. A., Liu, Y., Tan, X., Liu, S., et al. (2013). Spectrum allocation based on game theory in cognitive radio networks. Journal of Networks, 8(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, L., Lam, K. Y., Xiong, M., Li, F., Liu, X., & Wang, J. (2019). Spectrum pricing for cognitive radio networks with user’s stochastic distribution. Wireless Networks, 25, 2091–2099.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang, Y. L., Xu, Y. H., Wu, Q. H., Luo, Y., Xu, Y., Chen, X., et al. (2018). Context awareness group buying in D2D networks: A coalition formation game-theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(12), 12259–12272.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koskie, S., & Gajic, Z. (2005). A nash game algorithm for SIR-based power control in 3G wireless CDMA networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 13(5), 1017–1026.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical EngineeringNortheast Electric Power UniversityJilinChina
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceNortheast Electric Power UniversityJilinChina

Personalised recommendations