Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 4903–4914 | Cite as

Elliptic key cryptography with Beta Gamma functions for secure routing in wireless sensor networks

  • S. ViswanathanEmail author
  • A. Kannan
Article

Abstract

The security of data communicated through wireless networks is a challenging issue due to the presence of malicious and unauthenticated users whose intention is either to disrupt the communication or to know context of the data communicated to perform data theft and prevent the communication made by genuine users. To address this problem, a new secure routing algorithm with a novel encryption scheme is proposed in this paper using the cyclic group based Elliptic curve cryptography in which an encryption key is formed from the points taken from the Beta and Gamma functions in the elliptic key cryptography. For this purpose, the elliptic key is encrypted using the proposed encryption and decryption schemes. Further, it is proved that the proposed model decreases the computational complexity and increases the security, when it is compared to the other signature schemes. This scheme has been tested both analytically and using computer implementation of the proposed secure routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. It is proved that this proposed scheme is more reliable in providing security than the existing algorithms. The cyclic group used in this work makes the number of elements to be from a finite set of integers and hence the computational complexity is reduced and finite. The experiments have been carried out using Python coding and by transmitting different number of words through the wireless network. It is found that overall complexity for encryption and communication is less in this proposed algorithm than the existing Elliptic Curve Cryptography algorithm.

Keywords

Elliptic curve Encryption decryption Beta Gamma functions Cyclic group Secure routing Wireless sensor networks 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. (1976). New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22(6), 644–654.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Das, A., & Veni Madhavan, C. E. (2009). Public-key cryptography: Theory and practice. New Delhi: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vijayakumar, P., Bose, S., & Kannan, A. (2013). Centralized key distribution protocol using the greatest common divisor method. Computers & Mathematics Applications, 65(9), 1360–1368.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferng, H. W., Tendean, R., & Kurniawan, A. (2012). Energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with static clustering and dynamic structure. Wireless Personal Communications, 65(2), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (2004). HEED: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(4), 366–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on System sciences, 2000 (pp. 3005–3014). IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Logambigai, R., & Kannan, A. (2016). Fuzzy logic based unequal clustering for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 22(3), 945–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, V. S. (1985). Use of elliptic curves in cryptography. In Conference on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques (pp. 417–426). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koblitz, N. (1987). Elliptic curve cryptosystems. Mathematics of Computation, 48(177), 203–209.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978). A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Communications of the ACM, 21(2), 120–126.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hankerson, D., Menezes, A. J., & Vanstone, S. (2006). Guide to elliptic curve cryptography. Berlin: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chou, W., & Washington, D. L. (2003). Elliptic curve cryptography and its applications to mobile devices. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koblitz, N., Menezes, A., & Vanstone, S. (2000). The state of elliptic curve cryptography. Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 19(2–3), 173–193.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dabholkar, A., & Yow, K. C. (2004). Efficient implementation of elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) for personal digital assistants (PDAs). Wireless Personal Communications, 29(3–4), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silverman, J. H. (1985). The arithmetic of elliptic curves. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andrews, G. E., Askey, R., & Roy, R. (1999). Special functions. In Encyclopaedia of mathematics and its applications (Vol. 71).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Natanael, Dimas, & Faisal, Dewi Suryani. (2018). Text encryption in android chat applications using Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC). Procedia Computer Science, 135(2018), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Science and Technology, College of Engineering, Faculty of Information and Communication EngineeringAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations