Counting time in drops: views on the role and importance of smartwatches in dew computing

  • Charles Tim Batista GarrochoEmail author
  • Ricardo Augusto Rabelo Oliveira


A large amount of data, called the big data, generated by the devices that are part of the Internet of Things, is expected in the coming years. This scenario creates challenges for sending, processing, and storing all data centrally in the cloud. Recent works propose a decentralization of the processing and storage of this data in local devices close to the user to solve such challenges. This paradigm, called dew computing, has been gaining attention from academia. Several works apply this proposal through devices such as desktops, laptops, and smartphones. However, after a systematic review, no studies were found that applied this proposal to smart wearable devices. Thus, this work shows the research, evaluation, analysis, and discussion of smartwatches for the dew computing environment. The results of this work showed that smartwatches could extend local device functionalities through performing services, cooperating with decentralizing cloud computing, and helping to reduce the negative impacts of the big data.


Smartwatches Dew Mobile Application 



We thank the Federal Institute of Minas Gerais and the Federal University of Ouro Preto for their support in the development of this work.


  1. 1.
    Chen, E. T. (2017). The Internet of Things: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges. In I. Lee (Ed.), The Internet of Things in the Modern Business Environment (pp. 167–187). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang, C., Huang, Q., Li, Z., Liu, K., & Hu, F. (2017). Big data and cloud computing: Innovation opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Digital Earth, 10, 13–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hashem, I. A. T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N. B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., & Khan, S. U. (2015). The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Information Systems, 47, 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, I. (2017). Big data: Dimensions, evolution, impacts, and challenges. Business Horizons, 60, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    VNI, C., Cisco visual networking index: Forecast and trends, 2017–2022. Available online from:  Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  6. 6.
    Mahmud, R., Kotagiri, R., & Buyya, R. (2018). Fog computing: A taxonomy, survey and future directions. In internet of everything (pp. 103–130). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ray, P. P. (2018). An introduction to dew computing: Definition, concept and implications. IEEE Access, 6, 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Šojat, Z., & Skala, K. (2016). Views on the role and importance of dew computing in the service and control technology. In Proceedings of international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, (pp. 164–168), IEEE.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gusev, M. (2017). A dew computing solution for iot streaming devices. In 40th international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO), (pp. 387–392), IEEE.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frincu, M. (2017). Architecting a hybrid cross layer dew-fog-cloud stack for future data-driven cyber-physical systems. In 40th international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO), (pp. 399–403), IEEE.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lipić, T., Skala, K. (2017). The key drivers of emerging socio-technical systems: A perspective of dew computing in cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Y., & LeBlanc, D. (2016). Integrating saas and saap with dew computing. In Proceedings of international conferences on big data and cloud computing, social computing and networking, sustainable computing and communications, (pp. 590–594), IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crnko, N. (2017). Distributed database system as a base for multilanguage support for legacy software. In Proceedings of international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, (pp. 371–374), IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Podbojec, D., Herynek, B., Jazbec, D., Cvetko, M., Debevc, M., & Kožuh, I. (2017). 3D-based location positioning using the dew computing approach for indoor navigation. In Proceedings of international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, (pp. 393–398), IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oparin, G., Bogdanova, V., Gorsky, S., & Pashinin, A. (2017). Service-oriented application for parallel solving the parametric synthesis feedback problem of controlled dynamic systems. In Proceedings of international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, (pp. 353–358), IEEE.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brezany, P., Ludescher, T., & Feilhauer, T. (2017). Cloud-dew computing support for automatic data analysis in life sciences. In Proceedings of international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, (pp. 365–370), IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gordienko, Y., et al. (2017). Augmented coaching ecosystem for non-obtrusive adaptive personalized elderly care on the basis of cloud-fog-dew computing paradigm. In Proceedings of international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, (pp. 359–364), IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skala, K., Davidovic, D., Afgan, E., Sovic, I., & Sojat, Z. (2015). Scalable distributed computing hierarchy: Cloud, fog and dew computing. Open Journal of Cloud Computing (OJCC), 2, 16–24.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, Y. (2015). Cloud-dew architecture. International Journal of Cloud Computing, 4, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, Y., & Pan, Y. (Jul. 2015). Cloud-dew architecture: Realizing the potential of distributed database systems in unreliable networks. In Proceedings of international conference on parallel and distributed processing techniques and applications, (pp. 85–89).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bradley, D. (2015). Dew helps ground cloud services. Science Spot.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, Y., The initial definition of dew computing. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  23. 23.
    Wang, Y. (2015). The relationships among cloud computing, fog computing, and dew computing. Dew Computing Research.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ristov, S., Cvetkov, K., & Gusev, M. (2016). Implementation of a horizontal scalable balancer for dew computing services. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 17, 79–90.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, Y. (2016). Definition and categorization of dew computing. Open Journal of Cloud Computing, 3, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, United Kingdom, Keele University, 33, 1–26.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kotz, D. (2017). Challenges and opportunities in wearable systems. In Proceedings of workshop on wearable systems and applications, (pp. 3–3), ACM.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Daiber, F., & Kosmalla, F. (2017). Tutorial on wearable computing in sports. In Proceedings of international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, (p. 65), ACM.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kong, X. T., Luo, H., Huang, G. Q., & Yang, X. (2018). Industrial wearable system: The human-centric empowering technology in industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–17.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silva, S. E. D., Oliveira, R. A. R., & Loureiro, A. A. F. (2017). Examining developments and applications of wearable devices in modern society. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Inc, A. Apple smart watch – Technical specifications. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  32. 32.
    GSMArena, Motorola moto 360 – Technical specifications. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019. 
  33. 33.
    LTD, S. E. C. Samsung galaxy gear s – Technical specifications. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  34. 34.
    Electronics, L. Lg watch r – Technical specifications. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  35. 35.
    Inc, S. M. C., Sony smart watch 3 – Technical specifications. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  36. 36.
    Seneviratne, S., Hu, Y., Nguyen, T., Lan, G., Khalifa, S., Thilakarathna, K., et al. (2017). A survey of wearable devices and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19, 2573–2620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kolamunna, H., Chauhan, J., Hu, Y., Thilakarathna, K., Perino, D., Makaroff, D., et al. (2017). Are wearables ready for secure and direct internet communication? GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications, 21, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Research, J. Cellular m2m connections to reach 1.3 billion by 2022, the operators fight for market share. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  39. 39.
    IDC, Idc forecasts shipments of wearable devices to nearly double by 2021 smart watches and new product categories gain traction. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  40. 40.
    Schaeffer, M. K., Veiga, J. E., Biduski, D., Rebonatto, M. T., & De Marchi, A. C. B. (2017). Android app lifestyle—smartphone and smartwatch integred into a cloud computing by web services. In Iberian conference on information systems and technologies, (pp. 1–6), IEEE.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Borthakur, D., Dubey, H., Constant, N., Mahler, L., & Mankodiya, K. (2017). Smart fog: Fog computing framework for unsupervised clustering analytics in wearable internet of things. In Global conference on signal and information processing, (pp. 472–476), IEEE.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zheng, H., Genaro Motti, V. (2018). Assisting students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive education with smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, (p. 350), ACM.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Statista, Forecasted value of the global wearable devices market from 2012 to 2018 (in billion U.S. dollars). Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  44. 44.
    Statista, Global wearable technology sales by category from 2014 to 2018 (in million units). Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  45. 45.
    Smith, T. Examining the wearables ecosystem. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  46. 46.
    Kalantari, M. (2017). Consumers’ adoption of wearable technologies: Literature review, synthesis, and future research agenda. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 12, 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 256–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Adapa, A., Nah, F. F.-H., Hall, R. H., Siau, K., & Smith, S. N. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34, 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Maddox, T. The dark side of wearables: How they’re secretly jeopardizing your security and privacy. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  50. 50.
    Statista, Smartwatch unit sales worldwide from 2014 to 2018 (in millions). Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  51. 51.
    Statista, Market share of smartwatch unit shipments worldwide by vendor from 2q’15 to 4q’17. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  52. 52.
    Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Skinner, A. L., Stone, C. J., Doughty, H., & Munafò, M. R. (2018). Stopwatch: The preliminary evaluation of a smartwatch-based system for passive detection of cigarette smoking. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 21, 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shoaib, M., Incel, O. D., Scholten, H., & Havinga, P. (2018). Smokesense: Online activity recognition framework on smartwatches. In International conference on mobile computing, applications, and services, (pp. 106–124), Springer.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vuković, M., Car, Ž., Pavlisa, J. I., & Mandić, L. (2018). Smartwatch as an assistive technology: Tracking system for detecting irregular user movement. International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications (IJEHMC), 9, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Al-Sharrah, M., Salman, A., & Ahmad, I. (2018). Watch your smartwatch. In International Conference on Computing Sciences and Engineering, (pp. 1–5), IEEE.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gregorio, J., Alarcos, B., & Gardel, A. (2019). Forensic analysis of nucleus RTOS on MTK smartwatches. Digital Investigation, 29, 55–66.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ray, P. P. (2019). Minimizing dependency on internetwork: Is dew computing a solution? Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 30, e3496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Inc., G. Google drive offline. Available online from: Accessed 14 Jan 2019.
  60. 60.
    Drago, I., Mellia, M., M Munafo, M., Sperotto, A., Sadre, R., & Pras, A. (2012). Inside dropbox: Understanding personal cloud storage services. In Proceedings of the 2012 internet measurement conference, (pp. 481–494), ACM.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shen, Y., Yang, F., Du, B., Xu, W., Luo, C., & Wen, H. (2018). Shake-n-shack: Enabling secure data exchange between smart wearables via handshakes. In International conference on pervasive computing and communications, (pp. 1–10), IEEE.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Pyattaev, A., Johnsson, K., Andreev, S., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2015). Communication challenges in high-density deployments of wearable wireless devices. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kos, A., Milutinović, V., & Umek, A. (2019). Challenges in wireless communication for connected sensors and wearable devices used in sport biofeedback applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 582–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kamišalić, A., Fister, I., Turkanović, M., & Karakatič, S. (2018). Sensors and functionalities of non-invasive wrist-wearable devices: A review. Sensors, 18, 1714.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Watson, A., & Zhou, G. (2018). Breathez: Using smartwatches to improve choking first aid. Smart Health.
  66. 66.
    John, L. H., Sarkar, C., & Prasad, R. V. (2018). Where is pele?: Pervasive localization using wearable and handheld devices. ACM SIGBED Review, 15, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Franck, T. (2018). Recognition and classification of aggressive motion using smartwatches. Ph.D. thesis, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zotz, N., Saft, S., Rosenlöhner, J., Böhm, P., & Isemann, D. (2018). Identification of age-specific usability problems of smartwatches. In International conference on computers helping people with special needs, (pp. 399–406), Springer.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jeong, S., Song, J., Kim, H., Lee, S., Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Kim, S., & Song, J. (2017). Design and analysis of wireless power transfer system using flexible coil and shielding material on smartwatch strap. In Wireless power transfer conference, (pp. 1–3), IEEE.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Yang, Y., & Cao, G. (2017). Characterizing and optimizing background data transfers on smartwatches. In International conference on network protocols, (pp. 1–10), IEEE.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Zhang, H., Wu, H., & Rountev, A. (2018). Detection of energy inefficiencies in android wear watch faces. In Joint meeting on European software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering, (pp. 691–702), ACM.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265, 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Candell, R., Kashef, M., Liu, Y., Lee, K. B., & Foufou, S. (2018). Industrial wireless systems guidelines: Practical considerations and deployment life cycle. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 12, 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Internet of things: A comprehensive review of enabling technologies, architecture, and challenges. IETE Technical Review, 35, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Fomichev, M., Álvarez, F., Steinmetzer, D., Gardner-Stephen, P., & Hollick, M. (2017). Survey and systematization of secure device pairing. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20, 517–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Garrocho, C. T. B., Silva, M. J. d., & Oliveira, R. A. R. (2018). D2D pervasive communication system with out-of-band control autonomous to 5G networks. Wireless Networks, 1–14.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lu, E. A., & Xiaoxuan, Chris. (2018). Snoopy: Sniffing your smartwatch passwords via deep sequence learning. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1, 152.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wang, Y., Wei, L., Vasilakos, A. V., & Jin, Q. (2017). Device-to-device based mobile social networking in proximity (msnp) on smartphones: Framework, challenges and prototype. Future Generation Computer Systems, 74, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wang, e a, & Yanting, (2016). Mobile-edge computing: Partial computation offloading using dynamic voltage scaling. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64, 4268–4282.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Tim Batista Garrocho
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ricardo Augusto Rabelo Oliveira
    • 2
  1. 1.Ouro Branco Campus, Federal Institute of Minas GeraisOuro BrancoBrazil
  2. 2.Computer DepartmentFederal University of Ouro PretoOuro PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations