A practical power allocation method for multi-user and multi-carrier networks
- 125 Downloads
In the majority of studies on wireless networks, it is assumed that the receiver perfectly knows the channel. Since this is not the case for real life applications, the channel must be estimated in those systems. Thus, current cellular wireless communication systems are designed to perform coherent detection, and channel estimator is one of the most important part of a receiver. The channel estimation error must be minimized, because the error to be made during the channel estimation phase significantly affects the performance of the data detector. This can be made possible by allocating required amount of power to the pilot symbols to estimate channel with minimum error as possible as. Hence, this study examines how to allocate the power between pilot and data symbols to minimize the error of the data detector. The long term evolution provides an opportunity to change the radiation emitted in the pilot sub-carriers according to the data sub-carriers. Since this opportunity is expected to be the case for next generation cellular wireless networks, in this study, the effect of channel estimation error on data detection performance of a multi-user and multi-carrier cellular wireless communication system is investigated. The proposed solution is a practical one to approximate to the optimum solution of the resulting optimization problem without solving it. It is seen that the results obtained in computer simulations are very close to the optimum ones.
KeywordsChannel estimation Multi-carrier multi-user communication Power allocation for pilot and data
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author, Nihat Kabaoğlu, declares that there is no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.
- 8.Wu, M., & Kam, P. Y. (2010). Instantaneous symbol error outage probability over fading channels with imperfect channel state information. In 2010 IEEE 71st vehicular technology conference, Taipei (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
- 9.Ghanavati, A. Z., Pareek, U., Muhaidat, S., & Lee, D. (2010). On the performance of imperfect channel estimation for vehicular ad-hoc networks. In 2010 IEEE 72nd vehicular technology conference-fall (pp. 1–5). ON: Ottawa.Google Scholar
- 10.Ghanavati, A. Z., & Lee, D. C. (2013). On the performance of selective decode and forward relaying over imperfectly known fading relay channels. In The ninth international conference on wireless and mobile communications, ICWMC 2013 (pp. 173–178).Google Scholar
- 11.Ghanavati, A. Z., & Lee, D. C. (2014). Optimal energy allocation between pilot and data symbols for minimizing frame error probability under imperfect fading channel information. In 2014 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (wcnc), Istanbul (pp. 1990–1995).Google Scholar
- 16.Salzer, T., Mottier, D., & Brunel, L. (2001). Influence of system load on channel estimation in MC-CDMA mobile radio communication systems. In IEEE VTS 53rd vehicular technology conference, (Vol. 1, pp. 521–526).Google Scholar
- 17.Boyd, S., & Vanderberghe, L. (2003). Convex optimization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 18.Hindi, H. (2004). A tutorial on convex optimization. In Proceedings of 2004 American control conference, Boston, MA, June 30–July 2 (pp. 3252–3265).Google Scholar