Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 2997–3003 | Cite as

A practical power allocation method for multi-user and multi-carrier networks

  • Nihat KabaoğluEmail author
Article
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

In the majority of studies on wireless networks, it is assumed that the receiver perfectly knows the channel. Since this is not the case for real life applications, the channel must be estimated in those systems. Thus, current cellular wireless communication systems are designed to perform coherent detection, and channel estimator is one of the most important part of a receiver. The channel estimation error must be minimized, because the error to be made during the channel estimation phase significantly affects the performance of the data detector. This can be made possible by allocating required amount of power to the pilot symbols to estimate channel with minimum error as possible as. Hence, this study examines how to allocate the power between pilot and data symbols to minimize the error of the data detector. The long term evolution provides an opportunity to change the radiation emitted in the pilot sub-carriers according to the data sub-carriers. Since this opportunity is expected to be the case for next generation cellular wireless networks, in this study, the effect of channel estimation error on data detection performance of a multi-user and multi-carrier cellular wireless communication system is investigated. The proposed solution is a practical one to approximate to the optimum solution of the resulting optimization problem without solving it. It is seen that the results obtained in computer simulations are very close to the optimum ones.

Keywords

Channel estimation Multi-carrier multi-user communication Power allocation for pilot and data 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author, Nihat Kabaoğlu, declares that there is no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao, N., Yu, F. R., & Sun, H. (2015). Adaptive energy-efficient power allocation in Green interference-alignment-based wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(9), 4268–4281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhao, N., Yu, F. R., Sun, H., & Li, M. (2016). Adaptive power allocation schemes for spectrum sharing in interference-alignment-based cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(5), 3700–3714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kibria, M. G., & Shan, L. (2015). Resource allocation optimization for users with different levels of service in multicarrier systems. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 22(11), 1869–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zarakovitis, C. C., & Ni, Q. (2016). Maximizing energy efficiency in multiuser multicarrier broadband wireless systems: Convex relaxation and global optimization techniques. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(7), 5275–5286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Imari, M., Imran, M. A., & Xiao, P. (2017). Radio resource allocation for multicarrier low-density-spreading multiple access. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(3), 2382–2393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi, J., Song, Z., & Ni, Q. (2017). Distributed resource allocation assisted by intercell interference mitigation in downlink multicell MC DS-CDMA systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(2), 1250–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassibi, B., & Hochwald, B. M. (2003). How much training is needed in multiple-antenna wireless links? IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49(4), 951–963.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, M., & Kam, P. Y. (2010). Instantaneous symbol error outage probability over fading channels with imperfect channel state information. In 2010 IEEE 71st vehicular technology conference, Taipei (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghanavati, A. Z., Pareek, U., Muhaidat, S., & Lee, D. (2010). On the performance of imperfect channel estimation for vehicular ad-hoc networks. In 2010 IEEE 72nd vehicular technology conference-fall (pp. 1–5). ON: Ottawa.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghanavati, A. Z., & Lee, D. C. (2013). On the performance of selective decode and forward relaying over imperfectly known fading relay channels. In The ninth international conference on wireless and mobile communications, ICWMC 2013 (pp. 173–178).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghanavati, A. Z., & Lee, D. C. (2014). Optimal energy allocation between pilot and data symbols for minimizing frame error probability under imperfect fading channel information. In 2014 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (wcnc), Istanbul (pp. 1990–1995).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Imko, M., Wang, Q., & Rupp, M. (2012). Optimal pilot symbol power allocation under time-variant channels. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012, 225.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2012-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kammoun, Abla, & Abed-Meraim, Karim. (2013). Performance analysis and optimal power allocation for linear receivers based on superimposed training. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2013, 227.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2013-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He, J., Tang, Z., & Che, Z. (2016). Fast and efficient user pairing and power allocation algorithm for non-orthogonal multiple access in cellular networks. Electronics Letters, 52, 2065–2067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, J., & Tang, Z. (2017). Low-complexity user pairing and power allocation algorithm for 5G cellular network non-orthogonal multiple access. Electronics Letters, 53, 626–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salzer, T., Mottier, D., & Brunel, L. (2001). Influence of system load on channel estimation in MC-CDMA mobile radio communication systems. In IEEE VTS 53rd vehicular technology conference, (Vol. 1, pp. 521–526).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boyd, S., & Vanderberghe, L. (2003). Convex optimization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hindi, H. (2004). A tutorial on convex optimization. In Proceedings of 2004 American control conference, Boston, MA, June 30–July 2 (pp. 3252–3265).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations