Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 765–775 | Cite as

Ant colony prediction by using sectorized diurnal mobility model for handover management in PCS networks

  • Ahmed I. Saleh
  • Mohamed S. Elkasas
  • Alyaa A. HamzaEmail author
Article
  • 143 Downloads

Abstract

Recently, mobile phones are extremely used in lifestyle. Historical records of mobile users (MUs) play an important role in predicting future movements of new visitors of the underlying registration area. Handover (handoff) is one of important quality of service (QoS) parameter that affects the continuity of the call when MUs move from a cell to its neighbors in the same registration area (RA). In this paper, a novel ant based Algorithm, has been introduced, which is called Ant Prediction Algorithm (APA). The main target of APA is to reduce handover impact on the performance of personal communication service (PCS) networks. To accomplish such aim, APA tries to minimize the number of dropped calls by predicting the long-term movement of MUs based on the Sectored Diurnal Mobility Model (SDMM). APA consists of two Parts, namely; (i) the Ant Prediction Engine (APE), which relies on the movement history of the other MUs to predict the future movement of the considered MU, and (ii) the SDMM design, which predicts the exact future sector and cell of the considered MU. Simulations have been presented to validate the proposed scheme in terms of prediction accuracy and handoff blocking probability.

Keywords

Personal communications networks Handover schemes Prediction theory Ant colony 

References

  1. 1.
    Saleh, A. I. (2010). A new strategy for managing user’s locations in PCS networks using hot spots topology: discussion and analysis. International Journal of Mobile Network Design and Innovation, 3(3), 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keshav, T. (2006). Location management in wireless cellular networks. https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse574-06/ftp/cellular_location/index.html.
  3. 3.
    Zhang, J. (2002). Location management in cellular networks. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nayyar, A., & Singh, R. (2014). A comprehensive review of ant colony optimization (ACO) based energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Wireless Networks and Broadband Technologies (IJWNBT), 3(3).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim, C. P., & Dehuri, S. (2009). Innovations in swarm intelligence. New York: Springer.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beni, G. (2005). From swarm intelligence to swarm robotics. In Swarm robotics, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonabeau, E., et al. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dorigo, M., & Stützle, T. (2003). The ant colony optimization metaheuristic: Algorithms, applications, and advances. In Handbook of metaheuristics. Springer, pp. 250–285.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoonderwoerd, R., et al. (1997). Ant-based load balancing in telecommunications networks. Adaptive Behavior, 5(2), 169–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roy, B., et al. (2012). Ant colony based routing for mobile ad-hoc networks towards improved quality of services. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(1), 10–14.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar, S. B., & Myilsamy, G. (2013). Ant-colony-based algorithm for multi-target tracking in mobile sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 64(2), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nayyar, A., & Singh, R. (2017). Simulation and performance comparison of ant colony optimization (ACO) routing protocol with AODV, DSDV, DSR routing protocols of wireless sensor networks using NS-2 simulator. American Journal of Intelligent Systems, 7(1), 19–30.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shah, P. A., et al. (2013). An enhanced procedure for mobile IPv6 route optimization to reduce handover delay and signaling overhead. In International multi topic conference. Springer.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, C. (2013). A two-step vertical handoff decision algorithm based on dynamic weight compensation. In Proceedings of the ICC 2013.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, H., Ma, W., Jiang, C., & Li, W. (2011) Signaling cost evaluation of handover management schemes in LTE-advanced femtocell. In IEEE VTC, Budapest, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, H., Jiang, C., Cheng, J., & Leung, V. (2015). Cooperative interference mitigation and handover management for heterogeneous cloud small cell networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(3), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saleh, A. I. M. (2016). A Hybrid mobility prediction (HMP) strategy for PCS networks. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 19(1), 173–206.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu, L., et al. (2011). A dynamic ant colony optimization for load balancing in MRN/MLN. In Asia communications and photonics conference and exhibition, Optical Society of America.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Claes, R., & Holvoet, T. (2010). Maintaining a distributed symbiotic relationship using delegate multiagent systems. In Simulation conference (WSC), proceedings of the 2010 winter. IEEE.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Claes, R., et al. (2011). A decentralized approach for anticipatory vehicle routing using delegate multiagent systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(2), 364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chellappa, R., et al. (2003). The sectorized mobility prediction algorithm for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ICT.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sadhukhan, S. K., et al. (2010). A novel direction-based diurnal mobility model for handoff estimation in cellular networks. In India conference (INDICON), 2010 annual IEEE. IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin, Y.-B., et al. (2013). Predicting human movement based on telecom’s handoff in mobile networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(6), 1236–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Daoui, M., et al. (2008). Mobility prediction based on an ant system. Computer Communications, 31(14), 3090–3097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu, T., et al. (1998). Mobility modeling, location tracking, and trajectory prediction in wireless ATM networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(6), 922–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martinez-Zeron, E., et al. (2014). Method to improve airborne pollution forecasting by using ant colony optimization and neuro-fuzzy algorithms. International Journal of Intelligence Science, 4(04), 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen, B., & Chen, L. (2014). A link prediction algorithm based on ant colony optimization. Applied Intelligence, 41(3), 694–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davoodi, M., & Mesgari, M. (2015). GIS-based route finding using ant colony optimization and urban traffic data from different sources. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40(1), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    El Fachtali, I., et al. (2016). Vertical handover decision algorithm using ants’ colonies for 4G heterogeneous wireless networks. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2016, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamza, A. A., Saleh, A. I., & Mostafa, M. (2016). A mixed movement predictor (MMP) for handling handover problem in PCS networks. Ciencia e Tecnica Vitivinicola Journal, 31(5), 24–45.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li, P., et al. (2017). Energy optimization of ant colony algorithm in wireless sensor network. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(4), 1550147717704831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Su, D. (2010). A self-optimizing mobility management scheme based on cell ID information in high velocity environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICCNT, pp. 285–288.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang, W. (2012). Mobility robustness optimization in femtocell networks based on ant colony algorithm. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E95-B(4), 1455–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang, C. (2017). Fog radio access networks: Mobility management, interference mitigation and resource optimization. IEEE Wireless Communications. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, C. (2017). Network slicing based 5G and future mobile networks: Mobility, resource management, and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(8), 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shanghai. (2009). A novel self-optimizing handover mechanism for multi-service provisioning in LTE-advanced. In Proceedings of IEEE ICRCCS’09, pp. 221–224.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Heng, H. Z., et al. (2013). Mobility robustness optimization in self-organizing LTE femtocells networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed I. Saleh
    • 1
  • Mohamed S. Elkasas
    • 1
  • Alyaa A. Hamza
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Computer Engineering and Systems Department, Faculty of EngineeringMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt

Personalised recommendations