Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 287–301 | Cite as

Feature based fall detection system for elders using compressed sensing in WVSN

  • Angayarkanni VeeraputhiranEmail author
  • Radha Sankararajan
Article
  • 168 Downloads

Abstract

In general there is a steep increase in the number of cases related to elderly people falling down and getting hospitalized since they are living alone. This increases the need for an efficient and low cost surveillance based fall detection system. Wireless video sensor network (WVSN) can be used for such surveillance applications like monitoring elderly people at home, old age homes or hospitals. But there are some limitations in WVSN like memory constraint, low bandwidth and limited battery life. A light weight fall detection algorithm with efficient encoding technique is needed to make WVSN suitable for health care applications. In this paper a simple feature based fall detection system using compressed sensing algorithm is proposed and it is compared with the existing method. This proposed framework shows 82.5% reduction in time and 83.75% reduction in energy compared to raw frame transmission. The average percentage of space saving achieved by this proposed work is 83.81% which shows 30% increase when compared to the existing method.

Keywords

Fall detection Fall confirmation Features Compressed sensing Wireless video sensor networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Rashid, B., & Rehmani, M. H. (2016). Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 60, 192–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lindemann, U., Hock, A., Stuber, M., Keck, W., & Becker, C. (2005). Evaluation of a fall detector based on accelerometers: A pilot study. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 43(5), 548–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, T., Wang, J., Xu, L., & Liu, P. (2006), Using wearable sensor and NMF algorithm to realize ambulatory fall detection. In International conference on natural computation, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8), 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selvabala, V. S. N., & Ganesh, A. B. (2012). Implementation of wireless sensor network based human fall detection system. Procedia Engineering, 30, 767–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Melodia, T., & Chowdhury, K. R. (2007). A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Computer Networks, 51(4), 921–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Angayarkanni, V., & Radha, S. (2016). Design of bandwidth efficient compressed sensing based prediction measurement encoder for video transmission in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 88(3), 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Madhubala, S., & Umamakeswari, A. (2015). A survey on technical approaches in fall detection system. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 5(4), 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, Z., Conly, C., & Athitsos, V. (2015). A survey on vision-based fall detection. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on PErvasive technologies related to assistive environments. ACM.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, L., Ren, Y., Hu, H., & Tian, B. (2015). New fast fall detection method based on spatio-temporal context tracking of head by using depth images. Sensors, 15(9), 23004–23019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams, A., Ganesan, D., & Hanson, A. (2007). Aging in place: Fall detection and localization in a distributed smart camera network. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madhubala, J. S., & Umamakeswari, A. (2015). A vision based fall detection system for elderly people. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S9), 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Díaz-Ramírez, A., Domínguez, E., & Martínez-Alvarado, L. (2015). A falls detection system for the elderly based on a WSN. In International symposium on technology and society (ISTAS), IEEEGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neggazi, M., Hamami, L., & Amira, A. (2014). Efficient compressive sensing on the shimmer platform for fall detection. In IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS), IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Luo, X., et al. (2012). Design and implementation of a distributed fall detection system based on wireless sensor networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 1, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Donoho, D. L. (2006). Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(4), 1289–1306.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Candes, E. J. (2008). The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 346(9–10), 589–592.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yin, M., Yu, K., & Wang, Z. (2016). Compressive sensing based sampling and reconstruction for wireless sensor array network. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aruna, N., Angayarkanni, V., & Radha, S. (2015). Compressed sensing based quantization with prediction encoding for video transmission in WSN. In IEEE International conference on computation of power, energy information and commuincation (ICCPEIC).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai, T. T., & Wang, L. (2011). Orthogonal matching pursuit for sparse signal recovery with noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 57(7), 4680–4688.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Charfi, I., Mitéran, J., Dubois, J., Atri, M., & Tourki R. (2012). Definition and performance evaluation of a robust SVM based fall detection solution. In 8th International conference on signal image technology and internet based systems (SITIS).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Auvinet, E., Rougier, C., Meunier, J., St-Arnaud, A., & Rousseau, J. (2010) Multiple cameras fall dataset. Technical report 1350, DIRO - Université de Montréal, July.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yunus, F., Sharifah, H. S., Ariffin, S. K., & Ismail, N. S. (2013). Optimum parameters for MPEG-4 data over wireless sensor network. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 5(5), 0975-4024.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amjad, M., Sharif, M., Afzal, M. K., & Kim, S. W. (2016). TinyOS-new trends, comparative views, and supported sensing applications: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(9), 2865–2889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Akhtar, F., & Rehmani, M. H. (2015). Energy replenishment using renewable and traditional energy resources for sustainable wireless sensor networks: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Nandhini, S. A., Sankararajan, R., & Rajendiran, K. (2015). Video compressed sensing framework for wireless multimedia sensor networks using a combination of multiple matrices. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 44, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angayarkanni Veeraputhiran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Radha Sankararajan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringSSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations