Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 49–61 | Cite as

Anchor node path planning for localization in wireless sensor networks

  • Ketan Sabale
  • S. MiniEmail author
Article

Abstract

Localization is one of the most important challenges of wireless sensor networks because the location information is typically used in other domains such as coverage, deployment, routing, and target tracking. There exist some localization algorithms that facilitate the sensor nodes to locate itself using the mobile anchor node position. Some crucial attempts have been made in the past for optimizing the mobile anchor node trajectory with good accuracy. This paper presents a novel path planning scheme, D-connect, which ensures the localization of all the sensor nodes with minimum trajectory length. The performance of the proposed scheme is evaluated through a series of simulations. Experimental results reveal that the shortest path for traversing the whole area can be traced with the minimum localization error using this method. It also shows that D-connect outperforms the existing methods in terms of the anchor node trajectory length as well as the localization error.

Keywords

Sensor network Localization Anchor node Path planning mechanisms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Ankit Dubey, Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology Goa, India for his valuable and constructive suggestions during the development of this research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8), 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munir, S. A., Ren, B., Jiao, W., Wang, B., Xie, D., & Ma, J. (2007). Mobile wireless sensor network: Architecture and enabling technologies for ubiquitous computing. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW07), USA, May 21–23, 113–120.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nazir, U., Arshad, M. A., Shahid, N., & Raza, S. H. (2012). Classification of localization algorithms for wireless sensor network: A survey. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST), Lahore, Pakistan, Dec 20–22, 1–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baggio, A., & Langendoen, K. (2006). Monte-carlo localization for mobile wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks, Hong Kong, China, December 13–15, 317–328.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheu, J.-P., Hu, W.-K., & Lin, J.-C. (2010). Distributed localization scheme for mobile sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 9(4), 516–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, K., Kim, H., & Hong, Y. (2009). A self localization scheme for mobile wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology, Seoul, TBD, Korea (South), Nov 24–26, 774–778.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sichitiu, M. L., & Ramadurai, V. (2004). Localization of wireless sensor networks with a mobile beacon. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on, Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, Oct 25–27, 174–183.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, Z., Gu, D., Song, Z., & Li, H. (2008). Localization in wireless sensor networks using a mobile anchor node. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Xian, China, Jul 2–5, 602–607.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bahi, J. M., Makhoul, A., & Mostefaoui, A. (2008). Hilbert mobile beacon for localisation and coverage in sensor networks. International Journal of Systems Science, 39(11), 1081–1094.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rezazadeh, J., Moradi, M., Ismail, A. S., & Dutkiewicz, E. (2014). Superior path planning mechanism for mobile beacon-assisted localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14(9), 3052–3064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koutsonikolas, D., Das, S. M., & Hu, Y. C. (2007). Path planning of mobile landmarks for localization in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 30(13), 2577–2592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang, J., Han, G., Xu, H., Shu, L., & Guizani, M. (2011). Lmat: Localization with a mobile anchor node based on trilateration in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), Houston, TX, USA, Dec 5–9, 1–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Munoz, D., Lara, F. B., Vargas, C., & Enriquez-Caldera, R. (2009). Position location techniques and applications. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shang, F., Su, W., Wang, Q., Gao, H., & Fu, Q. (2014). A location estimation algorithm based on RSSI vector similarity degree. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2014, 371350. doi: 10.1155/2014/371350.
  15. 15.
    Sahu, P. K., Wu, E. H.-K., & Sahoo, J. (2013). DuRT: dual RSSI trend based localization for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(8), 3115–3123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sarkar, T. K., Ji, Z., Kim, K., Medouri, A., & Salazar-Palma, M. (2003). A survey of various propagation models for mobile communication. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 45(3), 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rappaport, T. S., et al. (1996). Wireless communications: Principles and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mondal, K., Karmakar, A., & Mandal, P. S. (2016). Path planning algorithms for mobile anchors towards range-free localization. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 97, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNational Institute of Technology GoaFarmagudiIndia

Personalised recommendations