Wireless Networks

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1885–1903 | Cite as

ZGLS: a novel flat quorum-based and reliable location management protocol for VANETs

  • Maaz RehanEmail author
  • Halabi Hasbullah
  • Ibrahima Faye
  • Waqas Rehan
  • Omer Chughtai
  • Mubashir Husain Rehmani


In location management services, a destination advertises its position attributes to a set of vehicles called location servers while, a source obtains these attributes from such location servers to track destination. The location management techniques in VANET have been categorized into flooding-based, flat hashing-based, hierarchical hashing-based and hierarchical quorum-based techniques. In flooding-based location service, destination information is flooded to the entire network which results into high congestion, low throughput and non-scalable network. In flat hashing, a global hash function is applied to compute location servers of each destination which results into higher delay, drop and signaling overhead in large VANETs. In hierarchical hashing, global hash function computes location servers of destination in hierarchical order. It therefore suffers from handover signaling between servers, high load on the top hierarchy and location query delay when source and destination are apart. In hierarchical quorum-based, location servers are identified cluster-wise and therefore it also suffers from the problems similar to hierarchical techniques. To overcome these problems, ZoomOut Geographic Location Service (ZGLS) protocol is proposed which introduces flat quorum-based location management service. In contrast to the aforementioned techniques, the novelty of ZGLS lies in the fact that it has shifted the location server role from hashing-based or clustering-based geographic areas to few 1-hop neighbours, called relatives. The proposed protocol creates a chain of relatives to provide positioning and tracking service. To evaluate signalling overhead, timeliness and the reliability of update and query packets, ZGLS is compared with RLSMP and HRHLS through ns-2 simulations. The results reveal that ZGLS stands out as a better choice for large-scale sparse and dense VANETs.


Positioning and tracking Location services Position-based routing Adaptive beaconing Packet delivery VANETs 



The authors are thankful to Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS for providing work space and intellectual environment, under the health and safety environment (HSE) rules, to complete this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. 1.
    Mauve, M., Widmer, J., & Hartenstein, H. (2001). A survey on position-based routing in mobile ad hoc networks. Network, IEEE, 15, 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garg, A., Pandey, K., & Singh, B. (2014). Hierarchical map-based location service for VANETs in urban environments. In Contemporary computing (IC3), 2014 Seventh International Conference on, 2014, (pp. 199–205).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basagni, S., Chlamtac, I., Syrotiuk, V. R., & Woodward, B. A. (1998). A distance routing effect algorithm for mobility (DREAM). In Presented at the proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, Dallas: Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ko, Y.-B., & Vaidya, N. H. (2000). Location-aided routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Network, 6, 307–321.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ayaida, M., Fouchal, H., Afilal, L., & Ghamri-Doudane, Y. (2012). A comparison of reactive, grid and hierarchical location-based services for VANETs. In Vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), IEEE, (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hui, C., Jiannong, C., Hsiao-Hwa, C., & Hongke, Z. (2008). GrLS: group-based location service in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57, 3693–3707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ashok, D. M., Pai, M. M. M., & Mouzna, J. (2011). Efficient map based location service for VANETs. In 2011 11th international conference on ITS telecommunications (ITST) (pp. 387–392).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flury, R., & Wattenhofer, R. (2006). MLS: an efficient location service for mobile ad hoc networks. In Presented at the Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ayaida, M., Barhoumi, M., Fouchal, H., Ghamri-Doudane, Y., & Afilal, L. (2012). HHLS: A hybrid routing technique for VANETs. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 44–48).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Euisin, L., Hyunsoo, C., Thirumurthi, P., Gerla, M., & Sang-Ha, K. (2013). Quorum-based location service in vehicular sensor networks. In 9th International wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 1744–1749).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaki, S., Ngadi, M. A., Razak, S., Kamat, M., & Shariff, J. (2012). Location service management protocol for vehicular ad hoc network urban environment. In N. Meghanathan, N. Chaki, & D. Nagamalai (Eds.), Advances in computer science and information technology. Computer Science and Engineering (Vol. 85, pp. 563–574). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kie, W., Füßler, H., Jorg, W., & Mauve, M. (2004). Hierarchical location service for mobile ad-hoc networks. SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 8, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katsaros, K., Dianati, M., & Long, L. (2013). Effective implementation of location services for VANETs in hybrid network infrastructures. In 2013 IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC) (pp. 521–525).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Das, S. M., Pucha, H., & Hu, Y. C. (2005). Performance comparison of scalable location services for geographic ad hoc routing. In INFOCOM 2005. 24th annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies. Proceedings IEEE(vol. 2, pp. 1228–1239).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boumerdassi, S., & Renault, E. (2016). A flooding-based solution to improve location services in VANETs. In 2016 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xiang-yu, B., Xin-ming, Y., Jun, L., & Hai, J. (2009). VLS: A map-based vehicle location service for city environments. In IEEE International conference on communications, ICC ‘09 (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ayaida, M., Barhoumi, M., Fouchal, H., Ghamri-Doudane, Y., & Afilal, L. (2014). Joint routing and location-based service in VANETs. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 74, 2077–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brahmi, N., Boussedjra, M., Mouzna, J., Cornelio, A. K. V., & Manohara, M. M. (2010). An improved map-based location service for vehicular ad hoc networks. In IEEE 6th international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob) (pp. 21–26).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boussedjra, M., Mouzna, J., Bangera, P., & Pai, M. M. M. (2009). Map-Based Location Service for VANET, In International conference on ultra modern telecommunications & workshops, 2009. ICUMT ‘09. (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, J.-S. L. C.-G. (2013). A Novel Group-based location service management scheme in VANETs. Journal of Advances in Computer Networks, 1, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saleet, H., Basir, O., Langar, R., & Boutaba, R. (2010). Region-based location-service-management protocol for VANETs. Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 59, 917–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hyunje, W., & Meejeong, L. (2011). Mobile group based location service management for vehicular ad-hoc networks. In 2011 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hyunje, W., &. Meejeong, L. (2012). Vehicle location service scheme using the vehicle trajectory for VANETs, In Advanced communication technology (ICACT), 2012 14th international conference on (pp. 1256–1261).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zaki, S., Ngadi, M. A., & Razak, S. (2014). Location service protocol for highly mobile ad hoc network. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39, 861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zeadally, S., Hunt, R., Chen, Y.-S., Irwin, A., & Hassan, A. (2012). Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): status, results, and challenges. Telecommunication Systems, 50, 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ETSI (2014). Intelligent transport system (ITS); vehicular communications; basic set of applications; Part 2: Specification of cooperative awareness basic service. ed. 650 Route des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex—FRANCE: European Telecommunications Standards Institute, (p. 44).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rehan, M., Hasbullah, H., Rehan, W., & Chughtai, O. (2015). ZoomOut HELLO: A novel 1-Hop broadcast scheme to improve network QoS for VANET on highways. In A. Laouiti, A. Qayyum, & M. N. Mohamad Saad (Eds.), Vehicular Ad hoc networks for smart cities (Vol. 306, pp. 75–84). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Harri, J., Filali, F., & Bonnet, C. (2009). Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey and taxonomy. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 11, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sharef, B. T., Alsaqour, R. A., & Ismail, M. (2014). Vehicular communication ad hoc routing protocols: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 40, 363–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    DLR (2013). SUMOSimulation of Urban Mobility. Available: Accessed 15 Sep 2012.
  32. 32.
    USC-ISI. (2008). The Network Simulatorns-2. Available: Accessed 15 May 2012.
  33. 33.
    Karp, B., & Kung, H. T. (2000). GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In presented at the Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maaz Rehan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Halabi Hasbullah
    • 1
  • Ibrahima Faye
    • 3
  • Waqas Rehan
    • 4
  • Omer Chughtai
    • 5
    • 6
  • Mubashir Husain Rehmani
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information SciencesUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASPerakMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science, COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyWah CanttPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Fundamental and Applied SciencesUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASPerakMalaysia
  4. 4.Institute of TelematicsUniversity of LuebeckLubeckGermany
  5. 5.Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASPerakMalaysia
  6. 6.Department of Electrical EngineeringCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyWah CanttPakistan

Personalised recommendations