Culture optimization for production and characterization of bioflocculant by Aspergillus flavus grown on chicken viscera hydrolysate
- 56 Downloads
The economics of bioflocculant production is coupled with the use of a low-cost substrate at appropriate culture conditions. The use of a waste substrate for this purpose offers an additional treatment measure to mitigate environmental pollution. We investigated the growth of Aspergillus flavus and its bioflocculant yield using chicken viscera hydrolysate as the sole media. The effects of culture conditions including time, pH, shaker speed, temperature and inoculum size on bioflocculant production were all investigated and optimised through response surface method based on the central component design (CCD) package of Design Expert. Next, the purified bioflocculant was physically and chemically characterised. Under optimised culture conditions (incubation time 72 h, pH 7, shaker speed 150 rpm, temperature 35 °C and inoculum 4%), 6.75 g/L yield of crude bioflocculant was recorded. The bioflocculant activity was mostly distributed in the cell-free supernatant with optimum efficiency of 91.8% at a dose of 4 mL/100 mL Kaolin suspension. The purified bioflocculant was a glycoprotein consisting of 23.46% protein and 74.5% sugar, including 46% neutral sugar and 2.01% uronic acid. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy fundamental analysis of the purified bioflocculant indicated that the mass proportion of C, O and N, were 63.46%, 27.87% and 8.86%, respectively. The bioflocculant is mainly composed of carbonyl, amino, hydroxyl, and amide functional groups. This study for the first time indicates a high potential of bioflocculant yield from chicken viscera at the appropriate culture conditions.
KeywordsBioflocculant Bioflocculation Efficiency Chicken viscera
The authors would like to thank Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, GUP Tier1 (Q.J130000.2545.13H22) and Demand-Driven Innovation Grant (R.J130000.7845.4L190) for their financial support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no financial or commercial conflict of interest.
- Coates J (2000) Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry, Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Comte S, Guibaud G, Baudu M (2006) Relations between extraction protocols for activated sludge extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and EPS complexation properties: part I Comparison of the efficiency of eight EPS extraction methods. Enzyme Microbial Technol 38(1–2):237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dong S, Ren N, Wang A, Ma F, Zhou D (2008) Production of bioflocculant using the effluent from a hydrogen-producing bioreactor and its capacity of wastewater treatment. Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering, 2008. ICBBE 2008, pp 3018–3022Google Scholar
- Gomaa EZ (2012) Production and characteristics of a heavy metals removing bioflocculant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pol J Microbiol 61(4):281–289Google Scholar
- Hefnawy MA, Gharieb MM, Shaaban MT, Soliman AM (2017) Optimization of culture condition for enhanced decolorization of direct blue dye by Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium canescens. J Appl Pharm Sci 7(02):083–092Google Scholar
- Kamsani N (2012) Optimization of oil palm empty fruit bunch degradation using crude cellulase from Aspergillus Niger EFB1 in rotary drum bioreactor. Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Hao Y, Jiang J, Zhu A, Zhu J, Dong Z (2016b) Production of a bioflocculant from Pseudomonas veronii L918 using the hydrolyzate of peanut hull and its application in the treatment of ash-flushing wastewater generated from coal fired power plant. Bioresour Technol 218:318–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nouha K, Kumar RS, Tyagi RD (2016) Heavy metals removal from wastewater using extracellular polymeric substances produced by Cloacibacterium normanense in wastewater sludge supplemented with crude glycerol and study of extracellular polymeric substances extraction by different methods. Bioresour Technol 212:120–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Okaiyeto K (2016) Evaluation of flocculating potentials and characterization of bioflocculants produced by three bacterial isolates from Algoa bay. University of Fort Hare, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
- Richmond A (2017) Cell response to environmental factors. In: Richmond A (ed) Handbook of microalgal mass culture (1986). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 69–100Google Scholar
- Yue L, Ma C, Chi Z (2006) Bioflocculant produced by Klebsiella sp. MYC and its application in the treatment of oil-field produced water. JOUC 5(4):333Google Scholar