Advertisement

Carbon balance of a sewage-fed aquaculture wetland

  • Subir Kumar NagEmail author
  • Saurav K. Nandy
  • Koushik Roy
  • U. K. Sarkar
  • B. K. Das
Original Paper

Abstract

Wetlands are considered as one of the most effective carbon (C) sink among various ecosystems. To substantiate this view, the present investigation was conducted in one of the units of sewage fed East Kolkata wetlands (EKW), a Ramsar site, over a period of 3 years. The result revealed that because of high primary productivity due to abundance of primary producers and other sources of C input primarily through sewage influx, there is net positive balance of C in the system. The rate of C accumulation estimated through C budget was 1245.27–2490.55 kg C ha−1 year−1 while the rate estimated through sediment core analysis came out to be 1584 kg C ha−1 year−1. The amount of total C deposited up to 15 cm depth in sediment was 29.37 Mg ha−1, quite higher than the C deposited up to 15 cm depth of reference upland soil which was measured at 23.79 Mg ha−1. If C burial from this experiment in 55 ha is up-scaled for entire EKW of 12,500 ha area, then it empirically corresponds to 56.97–113.94 Gg CO2 captured from atmosphere per annum. EKW is not only used for aquaculture production thereby harvesting blue carbon but also has great potential to accumulate C in its sediments and thus helping mitigate climate change.

Keywords

Carbon pool Carbon sequestration Sewage fed wetland Aquaculture Blue carbon 

Notes

References

  1. Adhikari S, Lal R, Sahu B (2012) Carbon sequestration in the bottom sediments of aquaculture ponds of Orissa, India. Ecol Eng 47:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anon (2017) Data obtained through personal communication with the wetland fisheries managerGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2012) Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, AWWA, WPCA, Washington, p 1193Google Scholar
  4. Bhatnagar A, Devi P (2013) Water quality guidelines for the management of pond fish culture. Int J Env Sci 3(6):1980–1997Google Scholar
  5. Boyd CE, Wood CW, Chaney PL et al (2010) Role of aquaculture pond sediments in sequestration of annual global carbon emissions. Environ Pollut 158:2537–2540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremner JM (1960) Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J Agric Sci 55(1):11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunting SW, Pretty J (2007) Global carbon budgets and aquaculture—emissions, sequestration and management options. Centre for Environment and Society Occasional Paper 2007-1. University of EssexGoogle Scholar
  8. De Silva SS, Soto D (2009) Climate change and aquaculture: potential impacts, adaptation and mitigation. In: Cochrane K., Young CD, Soto D, Bahri T (eds). Climate change implications for fisheries and aquaculture: overview of current scientific knowledge. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 530. Rome, FAO, 151–212Google Scholar
  9. Dean WE, Gorham E (1998) Magnitude and significance of carbon burial in lakes, reservoirs, and peatlands. Geology 26:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EKWMA. East Kolkata Wetlands Management Authority (2015). http://www.ekwma.com/index.php?view=default&MenuID=20. Accessed 8 Dec 2015
  11. Einsele G, Yan J, Hinderer M (2001) Atmospheric carbon burial in modern lake basins and its significance for the global carbon budget. Global Planet Change 30:167–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedlingstein P, Solomon S (2005) Contributions of past and present human generations to committed warming caused by carbon dioxide. PNAS 102:10832–10836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner WH (1986) Water content. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 1—physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 493–544Google Scholar
  14. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 1—physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 383–411Google Scholar
  15. Ghosh D (1998) Wastewater-fed aquaculture in the Wetlands of Calcutta—an overview. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse for Aquaculture. Institute of Wetland Management and Ecological Design, Wastewater-Fed Aquaculture, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) The solid phase. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4, physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 201–228Google Scholar
  17. ICAR (2011) Handbook of fisheries and aquaculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerr R (2006) Global warming is changing the world. Science 316:188–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:815–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Z, Song Z, Li B (2013a) The production and accumulation of phytolith-occluded carbon in Baiyangdian wetland of China. Appl Geochem 37:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Z, Song Z, Jiang P (2013b) Biogeochemical sequestration of carbon within phytoliths of wetland plants: a case study of Xixi wetland, China. Chin Sci Bull 58:2480–2487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller JB (2008) Sources, sinks and seasons. Nature 451:26–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitra S, Wassmann R, Vlek PLG (2005) An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock. Curr Sci 88:25–35Google Scholar
  24. Mitsch WJ (2016) Wetlands and climate change. Natl Wetl Newslett 38:5–11Google Scholar
  25. Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Nahlik AM et al (2013) Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landsc Ecol 28:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muniz JLM, Hernandez ME, Moreno-Casasola P (2013) Comparing soil carbon sequestration in coastal freshwater wetlands with various geomorphic features and plant communities in Veracruz, Mexico. Plant Soil 378:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter: Laboratory methods. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 961–1010Google Scholar
  28. NZTA (2010) Sediment accumulation monitoring techniques. New Zealand Transport Agency, Auckland Motorways, Auckland, p 11Google Scholar
  29. Olsen SR, Dean LA (1965) Phosphorous. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1036–1037Google Scholar
  30. Pal S, Chattopadhyay B, Mukhopadhyay SK (2013) Variability of carbon content in water and sediment in relation with physico-chemical parameters of East Kolkata wetland ecosystem: a Ramsar Site. NeBIO J 4:70–75Google Scholar
  31. Pal S, Manna S, Aich A et al (2014) Assessment of the spatio-temporal distribution of soil properties in East Kolkata wetland ecosystem (A Ramsar site: 1208). J Earth Syst Sci 123:729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pal S, Chattopadhyay B, Mukhopadhyay SK (2016) Spatio-temporal study of carbon sequestration through piscicultural practice at East Kolkata Wetland. J Environ Biol 37:965–971Google Scholar
  33. Pal S, Datta S, Chattopadhyay B et al (2017) Potential of wetland macrophytes to sequester carbon and assessment of seasonal carbon input into the East Kolkata wetland ecosystem. Wetlands 37:497–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Panigrahy S, Murthy TVR, Patel JG et al (2012) Wetlands of India: inventory and assessment at 1:50,000 scale using geospatial techniques. Curr Sci 102:852–856Google Scholar
  35. Pant HK, Rechcigl JE, Adjei MB (2015) Carbon sequestration in wetland: concept and estimation. Food Agric Environ 1(2):308–313Google Scholar
  36. Paul A (2011) Aquaculture in artificially developed wetlands in urban areas: relationship between soil and surface water in landscape ecology. Inst Town Plann India J 8:50–52Google Scholar
  37. Rhoades JD (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 417–435Google Scholar
  38. Smith SV, Renwick WH, Bartley JD et al (2002) Distribution and significance of small, artificial water bodies across the United States landscape. Sci Total Environ 299:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tanner DK, Brazner JC, Brady VJ (2000) Factors influencing carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of fish from a Lake Superior coastal wetland. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1243–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomas GW (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 475–490Google Scholar
  41. Trueman CN, Johnston G, O’hea B, MacKenzie KM (2014) Trophic interactions of fish communities at midwater depths enhance long term carbon storage and benthic production on continental slopes. Proc Royal Soc, B Biol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0669 Google Scholar
  42. Urbansky ET (2001) Total organic carbon analyzers as tools for measuring carbonaceous matter in natural waters. J Environ Monit 3:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vollenweider RA (1969) In: Vollenweider RA (ed) A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. IBP handbook no. 12. F. A. Davis Co., Philadelphia, Penn. P 213Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research InstituteBarrackporeIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Institute of Aquaculture and Protection of WatersUniversity of South Bohemia in Ceske BudejoviceČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations