Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 171–185 | Cite as

Geobotany in a fault in the world’s largest continuous wetland in central South America

  • Teodoro Isnard Ribeiro de AlmeidaEmail author
  • Cibele Hummel do Amaral
  • Moreno Botelho
  • Eduardo Francisco Ribeiro
  • Natasha Costa Penatti
Original Paper


The Pantanal is located in the center of South America in a tectonically active sedimentary basin of Quaternary age. Even though the relief is flat and the diversity of the sediments is low, its vegetation cover has high variability resulting from seasonal fluctuations in water levels and the presence of four surrounding biomes. Changes in elevation of less than 1 m influence the length and intensity of floods, powerfully affecting the vegetation. Faults with small vertical displacement can generate abrupt vegetation changes and, consequently, expressive vegetation lineaments. This study characterizes a lineament in the northern Pantanal, considering Land Surface Phenology, estimates of precipitation, and floristic survey. The phenological metrics, obtained from a 15-year time series from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer processed by TIMESAT software, discriminate evergreen forests in the NW of this lineament from savanna-like physiognomies in the SE region. Plant taxonomic identification shows two distinct regional strata with a clear separation between species adapted to prolonged floods in the NW and typical species of the Cerrado biome, mostly xeromorphic, in the SE. Data from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission complemented the analysis, showing different dependence on local rains on different sides of the lineament. The entire dataset defines this geological structure as a driver of the Pantanal’s plant communities, being a boundary for the extensive establishment of propagules of the Amazon biome. This research, in addition to advancing knowledge of this singular region, which is essential for management studies, can be a stimulus to biological and forest investigations.


Pantanal Vegetation lineament Geobotany Multitemporal remote sensing Neotectonics 



The authors would like to thank Angelina Barros Baruki and Sérgio Baruki, owners of the Recreio farm, not only for their gracious welcome to the team, but also for the support given in the infrastructure for displacements in the entire region. Without such support, it would have been impossible to carry out the fieldwork. Teodoro Isnard Ribeiro de Almeida thanks the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the Productivity Grant, Process 302925/2015, which funded most of the field campaign.

Supplementary material

11273_2018_9650_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)


  1. Alho CJR (2008) Biodiversity of the Pantanal: response to seasonal flooding regime and to environmental degradation. Braz J Biol 68:957–966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alho CJR (2011) Biodiversity of the Pantanal: its magnitude, human occupation, environmental threats and challenges for conservation. Braz J Biol 71:229–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida TIR, Penatti NC, Ferreira LG, Arantes AE, Amaral CH (2015) Principal component analysis applied to a time series of MODIS images: the spatio-temporal variability of the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Wetl Ecol Man 23:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assine ML, Soares PC (2004) Quaternary of the Pantanal, west-central Brazil. Quat Int 114:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assine ML, Merino ER, Pupim FN, Warren LV, Guerreiro RL, McGlue MM (2015) Geology and geomorphology of the Pantanal basin. In: Bergier I, Assine ML (eds) Dynamics of the Pantanal wetland in South America. Springer, Basel, pp 23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assine ML, Macedo HA, Stevaux JC, Bergier I, Padovani CR, Silva A (2016) Avulsive rivers in the hydrology of the Pantanal wetland. In: Bergier I, Assine ML (eds) Dynamics of the Pantanal wetland in South America. Springer, Basel, pp 83–110Google Scholar
  7. Barbier EB (1994) Valuing environmental functions: tropical wetlands. Land Econ 70:155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2004) Land surface phenology, climatic variation, and institutional change: analyzing agricultural land cover change in Kazakhstan. Remote Sens Environ 89:497–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collischonn B, Allasia D, Collischonn W, Tucci CEM (2011) Desempenho do satélite TRMM na estimativa de precipitação sobre a bacia do Paraguai superior. Rev Bras Cart 59:93–99Google Scholar
  10. Conservation International (2009) Monitoring alterations in vegetation cover and land use in the upper Paraguay River basin, Brazilian portion. Conservation International, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  11. Curto JB, Vidotti RM, Fuck RA, Blakely RJ, Alvarenga CJS, Dantas EL (2014) The tectonic evolution of the Transbrasiliano Lineament in northern Paraná Basin, Brazil, as inferred from aeromagnetic data. J Geophys Res 119:1544–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dias FLF, Assumpção M, Facincani EME, França GS, Assine ML, Paranhos Filho AC, Gamarra RM (2016) The 2009 earthquake, magnitude mb 4.8, in the Pantanal wetlands, west-central Brazil. An Acad Bras Ciênc 88:1253–1264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eklund L, Jönsson P (2016) TIMESAT for processing time-series data from satellite sensors for land surface monitoring. In: Jarocińska A, van der Meer FD (eds) Multitemporal remote sensing. Springer, Cham, pp 177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans TL, Costa M, Tomas WM, Camilo AR (2014) Large-scale habitat mapping of the Brazilian Pantanal wetland: a synthetic aperture radar approach. Remote Sens Environ 155:89–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forrest J, Miller-Rushing AJ (2010) Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:3101–3112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser LH, Keddy PA (2005) The world’s largest wetlands: ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ganguly S, Friedl MA, Tan B, Zhang X, Verma M (2010) Land surface phenology from MODIS: characterization of the collection 5 global land cover dynamics product. Remote Sens Environ 114:1805–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gondwe BR, Hong SH, Wdowinski S, Bauer-Gottwein P (2010) Hydrologic dynamics of the ground-water-dependent Sian Ka’an wetlands, Mexico, derived from InSAR and SAR data. Wetlands 30:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo M, Li J, Sheng C, Xu J, Wu L (2017) A review of wetland remote sensing. Sensors 17:777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton SK, Sippel SJ, Melack JM (1996) Inundation patterns in the Pantanal wetland of south America determined from passive microwave remote sensing. Arch Hydrobiol 137:1–23Google Scholar
  21. Huete AR, Didan K, Miura T, Rodriguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira LG (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 83:195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jamali S, Seaquist J, Ardö J, Eklundh L (2011). Investigating temporal relationships between rainfall, soil moisture and MODIS-derived NDVI and EVI for six sites in Africa. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
  23. Jönsson P, Eklund L (2004) TIMESAT—a program for analyzing time series of satellite sensor data. Comput Geosci 30:833–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Belhaven, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Lang M, Awl J, Wilen B, McCarty G, Galbraith J (2009) Improved wetland mapping. Nat Wetl News 31:6–11Google Scholar
  26. Leier AL, DeCelles PG, Pelletier JD (2005) Mountains, monsoons, and megafans. Geology 33:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lumbierres M, Méndez PF, Bustamante J, Soriguer R, Santamaría L (2017) Modeling biomass production in seasonal wetlands using MODIS NDVI land surface phenology. Remote Sens 9:392–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Nahlik AM, Mander Ü, Zhang L, Anderson CJ, Brix H (2013) Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Lands Ecol 28:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nunes da Cunha C, Junk WJ, Leitão-Filho HF (2007) Woody vegetation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil: a preliminary typology. Amazoniana 19:159–184Google Scholar
  31. O’Loughlin FE, Paiva RCD, Durand M, Alsdorf DE, Bates PD (2016) A multi-sensor approach towards a global vegetation corrected SRTM DEM product. Remote Sens Environ 182:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Padovani CR (2010) Dinâmica espaço-temporal das inundações do Pantanal. Dissertation, University of São PauloGoogle Scholar
  33. Penatti NC, Almeida TIR (2013) Subdivision of Pantanal quaternary wetlands: MODIS NDVI timeseries in the indirect detection of sediments granulometry. ISPRS 1:311–316Google Scholar
  34. Penatti NC, Almeida TIR, Ferreira LG, Arantes AE, Coe MT (2015) Satellite-based hydrological dynamics of the world’s largest continuous wetland. Rem Sens Env 170:1-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pott A, Silva J (2015) Terrestrial and aquatic vegetation diversity of the Pantanal wetland. In: Bergier I, Assine ML (eds) Dynamics of the Pantanal wetland in South America. Springer, Basel, pp 111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pott A, Oliveira AKM, Damasceno-Junior GA, Silva JSV (2011) Plant diversity of the Pantanal wetland. Braz J Biol 71:265–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Reed BC (2006) Trend analysis of time-series phenology of North America derived from satellite data. Gisci Remote Sens 43:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ribeiro EF (2016) Lineamento regional no norte do Pantanal separando áreas de vegetação fenológica e floristicamente distintas: evidências de diversidade ambiental originada por neotectônica. Dissertation, University of São PauloGoogle Scholar
  39. Saleska SR, Didan K, Huete AR, Da Rocha HR (2007) Amazon forests green-up during 2005 drought. Science 318:612–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Savitzky A, Golay M (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 36:1627–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Silva JSV, Abdon MM (1998) Delimitação do Pantanal brasileiro e suas sub-regiões. Pesq Agropec Bras 33:1703–1711Google Scholar
  42. Soares PC, Assine ML, Rabelo L (1998) The Pantanal Basin: recent tectonics, relationships to the Transbrasiliano Lineament. Accessed 07 Oct 2017
  43. Souza HJ, Delabie JHC (2016) ‘Murundus’ structures in the semi-arid region of Brazil: testing their geographical congruence with mound-building termites (Blattodea: Termitoidea: Termitidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 52:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tan B, Morisette JT, Wolfe RE, Gao F, Ederer GA, Nightingale J, Pedelty JA (2011) A enhanced TIMESAT algorithm for estimating vegetation phenology metrics from MODIS data. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 4:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Townshend JR, Goff TE, Tucker CJ (1985) Multitemporal dimensionality of images of normalized difference vegetation index at continental scales. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 23:888–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner RK, Van Den Bergh JC, Söderqvist T, Barendregt A, Van Der Straaten J, Maltby E, Van Ierland EC (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35:7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ussami N, Shiraiwa S, Dominguez JML (1999) Basement reactivation in a sub-Andean foreland flexural bulge: the Pantanal wetland, SW Brazil. Tectonics 18:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Viña A, Tuanmu MN, Xu W, Li Y, Qi J, Ouyang Z, Liu J (2012) Relationship between floristic similarity and vegetated land surface phenology: implications for the synoptic monitoring of species diversity at broad geographic regions. Remote Sens Environ 121:488–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wessels K, Steenkamp K, Von Maltitz G, Archibald S (2011) Remotely sensed vegetation phenology for describing and predicting the biomes of South Africa. Appl Veg Sci 14:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams WT, Lamber JT (1966) Multivariate methods in plant ecology: V. Similarity analyses and information-analysis. J Ecol 54:427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woodward RT, Wui YS (2001) The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 37:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xiao X, Hagen S, Zhang Q, Keller M, Moore B III (2006) Detecting leaf phenology of seasonally moist tropical forests in South America with multi-temporal MODIS images. Remote Sens Environ 103:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang X, Friedl MA, Tan B, Goldberg MD, Yu Y (2012) Long-term detection of global vegetation phenology from satellite instruments. In: Phenology and climate changeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de GeociênciasUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Engenharia FlorestalUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil
  3. 3.MB Soluções FlorestaisViçosaBrazil

Personalised recommendations