Advertisement

Biological Sand Filter Performance Test Using Multiple Methods for Pathogen Detection: a Longitudinal Field Study in Kenya

  • Laura LackeyEmail author
  • Kyla Semmendinger
  • Michael MacCarthy
Article

Abstract

Fifty biological sand filters (BSFs) housed in 70-L plastic containers were built and installed in the West Pokot County of Kenya. Half of the BSFs were installed in June 2010; the remainder were installed in June 2012. BSF performance was analyzed during June 2012 and 2015. Performance indicators included the removal of turbidity and fecal and total coliforms. In 2012, 17 of the original 25 BSFs installed were operational, and their performance was evaluated. In 2015, 15 of the BSFs were operational. BSF performance during 2015 showed an average fecal coliform removal of 98.9%. The most common reasons provided to explain why the BSF installed was no longer in use included the family moved and the BSF was too heavy to carry, and the effluent pipe broke. Relative affluence was observed using the Progress out of Poverty Index (PPI)™. With an increase in elevation, we noted a decrease in PPI. The average PPI for homesteads with operation BSFs was 10 points higher than homes where the BSFs were in disrepair. An assay to estimate Escherichia coli presence and concentration was modified, and the results were compared with more traditional field enumeration methods. The field assay used a five-compartment bag to quantify the most probable number (MPN) of E. coli to provide a low-tech option to field workers in developing country to test the viability of drinking water sources. We used a Hach medium, varying from that prescribed by Aquagenx. Results from using the modified method compared well with the more traditional field assay.

Keywords

Biological sand filters Pathogen indicator Sustainability Point-of-use water treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Mercer On Mission (MOM) offers undergraduate students a unique opportunity to translate classroom learning to the field (mom.mercer.edu). A typical MOM requires 2 weeks of intensive classwork on campus that is followed by 3 weeks in the field. Mercer University undergraduate students participating in MOM played a significant role in BSF implementation, water sampling, and analysis. We are indebted to our partner and in-country host, Rev. Sam Harrell of Africa Exchange (www.africaexchange.org).

Funding Information

A Mercer University Quality Enhancement Plan (Research that Reaches Out) grant helped fund this work.

References

  1. Aiken, B. A., Stauber, C. E., Ortiz, G. M., & Sobsey, M. D. (2011). An assessment of continued use and health impact of the concrete biosand filter in Bonao, Dominican Republic. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 85(2), 309–317.  https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2011.09-0122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain, R., Bartram, J., Elliott, M., Matthews, R., Mcmahan, L., Tung, R., Chuang, P., & Gundry, S. (2012). A summary catalogue of microbial drinking water tests for low and medium resource settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(5), 1609–1625.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9051609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, D. L., & Duke, W. F. (2006). Intermittent slow sand filters for household use - a field study in Haiti. In R. Gimbel, N. Graham, & M. Collins (Eds.), Recent progress in slow sand and alternative biofiltration processes (1st ed., pp. 278–282). London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, J., Murcott, S., & Ezzati, M. (2007). Reconsidering “appropriate technology”: the effects of operating conditions on the bacterial removal performance of two household drinking-water filter systems. Environmental Research Letters, 2(2), 24003.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/2/2/024003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clasen, T. (2009). Scaling up household water treatment among low-income populations. In Public health and environment water, sanitation, hygiene and health World Health Organization (pp. 1–84) http://doi.org/WHO/HSE/WSH/09.02.Google Scholar
  6. Clasen, T. F., & Bastable, A. (2003). Faecal contamination of drinking water during collection and household storage: the need to extend protection to the point of use. Journal of Water and Health, 1(3), 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Divelbiss, D. W., Boccelli, D. L., Succop, P. A., & Oerther, D. B. (2013). Environmental health and household demographics impacting biosand filter maintenance and diarrhea in Guatemala: an application of structural equation modeling. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(3), 1638–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es303624a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duke, W. F., Nordin, R. N., Baker, D., & Mazumder, A. (2006). The use and performance of biosand filters in the artibonite valley of Haiti: a field study of 107 households. The International Electronic Journal of Rural and Remote Health Research, Education, Proactice and Policy, 6(3), 570 Retrieved from http://rrh.deakin.edu.au.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, M., Stauber, C. E., Digiano, F. A., de Aceituno, A. F., & Sobsey, M. D. (2015). Investigation of E. coli and virus reductions using replicate, bench-scale biosand filter columns and two filter media. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(9), 10276–10299.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120910276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genthe, B., & Franck, M. (2000). A field test for assessing the microbial quality of water: an H 2 S strip test. Sun City: WISA Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253728579_A_FIELD_TEST_FOR_ASSESSING_THE_MICROBIAL_QUALITY_OF_WATER_AN_H2S_STRIP_TEST.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, S. K., Sheikh, M. A., Islam, M. S., Rahman, K. S., Jahan, N., Rahman, M. M., Hoekstra, R. M., Johnston, R., Ram, P. K., & Luby, S. (2008). Usefulness of the hydrogen sulfide test for assessment of water quality in Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 104(2), 388–395.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03562.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyde, E. M., & Lackey, L. W. (2013). The impact of loading frequency and copper as a biocide on biosand filter performance. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 3(3), 355–366.  https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2013.084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyde, E., Lackey, L., Mines, R. O., Sumner, L., & Wyckoff, K. (2011). Providing sub-saharan Africans with drinking water through service learning. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, (June 2010). Retrieved from se.asee.org/proceedings/asee2011.
  14. Konieczny, J., & Rdzawski, Z. (2012). Antibacterial properties of copper and its alloys. Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, 56(2), 53–60.Google Scholar
  15. Manja, K. S., Maurya, M. S., & Rao, K. M. (1982). A simple field test for the detection of faecal pollution in drinking water. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 60(5), 797–801.Google Scholar
  16. McKenzie, E. R., Jenkins, M. W., Tiwari, S.-S. K., Darby, J., Saenyi, W., & Gichaba, C. M. (2013). In-home performance and variability of biosand filters treating turbid surface and rain water in rural Kenya. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 3(2), 189.  https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2013.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMahan, L., Devine, A. A., Grunden, A. M., & Sobsey, M. D. (2011). Validation of the H2S method to detect bacteria of fecal origin by cultured and molecular methods. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 92(6), 1287–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3520-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McMahan, L., Grunden, A. M., Devine, A. a., & Sobsey, M. D. (2012). Evaluation of a quantitative H2S MPN test for fecal microbes analysis of water using biochemical and molecular identification. Water Research, 46(6), 1693–1704.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murcott, S., Keegan, M., Hanson, A., Jain, A., Knutson, J., Liu, S., Tanphanich, J., & Wong, T. K. (2015). Evaluation of microbial water quality tests for humanitarian emergency and development settings. Procedia Engineering, 107, 237–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pathak, S. P., & Gopal, K. (2005). Efficiency of modified H2S test for detection of faecal contamination in water. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 108(1–3), 59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-3960-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rijal, G. K., & Fujioka, R. S. (2001). Synergistic effect of solar radiation and solar heating to disinfect drinking water sources. Water Science and Technology, 43(12), 155–162 Retrieved from http://wst.iwaponline.com/content/43/12/155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roser, D. J., Ashbolt, N., Ho, G., Mathew, K., Nair, J., Ryken-Rapp, D., & Toze, S. (2005). Hydrogen sulphide production tests and the detection of groundwater faecal contamination by septic seepage. Water Science and Technology, 51(10), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sisson, A. J., Wampler, P. J., Rediske, R. R., & Molla, A. R. (2013). An assessment of long-term biosand filter use and sustainability in the Artibonite Valley near Deschapelles, Haiti. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 3(1), 51.  https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2013.092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sobsey, M. D., & Pfaender, F. K. (2002). Evaluation of the H2S method for detection of fecal contamination of drinking water. World Health Organization, Department of Pretection and the Human Environment, Water, Sanitation, and Health. 1–44. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/WSH02.08.pdf
  25. Sobsey, M. D., Stauber, C. E., Casanova, L. M., Brown, J. M., & Elliott, M. A. (2008). Point of use household drinking water filtration: a practical, effective solution for providing sustained access to safe drinking water in the developing world. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(12), 4261–4267.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es702746n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stauber, C. E., Elliott, M. a., Koksal, F., Ortiz, G. M., DiGiano, F. a., & Sobsey, M. D. (2006). Characterisation of the biosand filter for E. coli reductions from household drinking water under controlled laboratory and field use conditions. Water Science and Technology, 54(3), 1.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stauber, C. E., Ortiz, G. M., Loomis, D. P., & Sobsey, M. D. (2009). A randomized controlled trial of the concrete biosand filter and its impact on diarrheal disease in Bonao, Dominican Republic. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 80(2), 286–293 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19190228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stauber, C. E., Kominek, B., Liang, K. R., Osman, M. K., & Sobsey, M. D. (2012a). Evaluation of the impact of the plastic biosand filter on health and drinking water quality in rural tamale, Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(11), 3806–3823.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9113806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stauber, C. E., Printy, E. R., McCarty, F. A., Liang, K. R., & Sobsey, M. D. (2012b). Cluster randomized controlled trial of the plastic BioSand water filter in Cambodia. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(2), 722–728.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es203114q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tiwari, S. S. K., Schmidt, W. P., Darby, J., Kariuki, Z. G., & Jenkins, M. W. (2009). Intermittent slow sand filtration for preventing diarrhoea among children in Kenyan households using unimproved water sources: randomized controlled trial. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 14(11), 1374–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02381.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright, J., Gundry, S., & Conroy, R. (2004). Household drinking water in developing countries: a systematic review of microbiological contamination between source and point-of-use. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 9(1), 106–117.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01160.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mercer University School of EngineeringMaconUSA

Personalised recommendations