Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 230:47 | Cite as

Adsorption Behavior of Cobalt onto Saline Soil with/without a Biosurfactant: Kinetic and Isotherm Studies

  • S. Narimannejad
  • B. ZhangEmail author
  • L. Lye
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Cobalt (Co) adsorption onto saline soil was investigated in this study. The effect of pH, interaction time, and initial concentration of Co on adsorption were evaluated empirically to screen the appropriate operating conditions. Three biosurfactant products (i.e., surfactin, trehalose lipids, rhamnolipid) each at two concentrations (1 and 2 critical micelle concentrations (CMCs)) were applied during Co adsorption. The adsorption kinetic models were explored and results indicated that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model fit the experimental data the best. Four isotherms, including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Redlich-Peterson were used for regulating the Co adsorption with and without the addition of each biosurfactant. The research results show that Co has low mobility even with the existence of a biosurfactant. The findings help to better understand the adsorption behaviour of Co in saline soil so as to develop applicable remediation options.

Keywords

Adsorption Biosurfactant Co Isotherm Kinetics Saline soil 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Canada Research Chairs (CRC) Program, Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and Rhamnolipid Inc. for the support.

References

  1. Abbas, M., Kaddour, S., & Trari, M. (2014). Kinetic and equilibrium studies of cobalt adsorption on apricot stone activated carbon. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 20, 745–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altintas, Y. (2012). Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arabloo, M., Ghazanfari, M. H., & Rashtchian, D. (2016). Wettability modification, interfacial tension and adsorption characteristics of a new surfactant: implications for enhanced oil recovery. Fuel, 185, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aşçi, Y., Nurbaş, M., & Açikel, Y. S. (2007). Sorption of Cd(II) onto kaolin as a soil component and desorption of Cd(II) from kaolin using rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B, 139, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM (2016a). Standard test method for pH of soils. ASTM D4972-18, ASTM International, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi? D4972. Accessed 25 August 2018.Google Scholar
  6. ASTM (2016b). Standard test methods for laboratory determination of density (unit weight) of soil specimens. ASTM D7263–09(2018)e2, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D7263. Accessed 25 August 2018.Google Scholar
  7. ASTM (2016c). Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM D2216–10, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D2216. Accessed 25 August 2018.Google Scholar
  8. Bower, C.A., Reitemeier, R.F. & Fireman, M. (1952). Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sicence, 73(4), 251–262.Google Scholar
  9. Cai, Q. (2018). Biosurfactant production and applications in oil contaminate control. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’sGoogle Scholar
  10. Cai, Q., Zhang, B., Chen, B., Zhu, Z., Lin, W., & Cao, T. (2014). Screening of biosurfactant producers from petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sources in cold marine environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 86(1–2), 402–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai, Q., Zhang, B., Chen, B., & Cao, T. (2016). Biosurfactant produced by a rhodococcus erythropolis mutant as an oil spill response agent. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 51(2), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, L., & Lu, S. (2008). Sorption and desorption of radiocobalt on montmorillonite-effects of pH, ionic strength and fulvic acid. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 66, 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chon, J. K., Lee, K. J., & Yun, J.-I. (2012). Sorption of cobalt(II) on soil: effects of birnessite and humic acid. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 293, 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, N. J., Brassington, D. S., Raza, A., & Mendham, A. P. (2006). Sorption of Co2+ and Sr2+ by waste-derived 11 Å tobermorite. Waste Management, 26, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolatkhah, A., & Wilson, L. D. (2016). Magnetite/polymer brush nanocomposites with switchable uptake behavior toward methylene blue. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 8, 5595–5607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ebrahimzadeh Rajaei, G., Aghaie, H., Zare, K., & Aghaie, M. (2013). Adsorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) ions from aqueous solutions onto fine powder of Typha latifolia L. root: kinetics and isotherm studies. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 39, 3579–3594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farah, J. Y., El-Gendy, N. S., & Farahat, L. A. (2007). Biosorption of astrazone blue basic dye from an aqueous solution using dried biomass of Baker’s yeast. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 148, 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faroon, O. M. (2004). Toxicological profile for cobalt. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp33.pdf. Accessed 25 August 2018.Google Scholar
  19. Ferraro, A., Fabbricino, M., van Hullebusch, E. D., Esposito, G., & Pirozzi, F. (2016). Effect of soil/contamination characteristics and process operational conditions on aminopolycarboxylates enhanced soil washing for heavy metals removal: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 15, 111–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Filipkowska, U., & Kuczajowska-Zadrozina, M. (2016). Investigation of the adsorption/desorption equilibria of Cd(II), Zn(II) and Cu(II) ions on/from immobilized digested sludge using biosurfactants. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freitas de Oliveira, D. W., França, I. W., Félix, A. K., Martins, J. J., Giro, M. E., Melo, V. M., & Gonçalves, L. R. (2013). Kinetic study of biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis LAMI005 grown in clarified cashew apple juice. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 101, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guerra, D. L., & Airoldi, C. (2008). Anchored thiol smectite clay-kinetic and thermodynamic studies of divalent copper and cobalt adsorption. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 181, 2507–2515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harendra, S., & Vipulanandan, C. (2013). Sorption and transport studies of cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and triton X-100 in clayey soil. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 25(3), 576–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hashemian, S., Saffari, H., & Ragabion, S. (2015). Adsorption of cobalt(II) from aqueous solutions by Fe3O4/bentonite nanocomposite. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 226, 2212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho, Y. S., & McKay, G. (1999). Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry, 34, 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jalali, M., & Majeri, M. (2016). Cobalt sorption-desorption behavior of calcareous soils from some Iranian soils. Chemie der Erde, 76, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Komy, Z. R., Shaker, A. M., Heggy, S. E. M., & El-Sayed, M. E. A. (2014). Kinetic study for copper adsorption onto soil minerals in the absence and presence of humic acid. Chemosphere, 99, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meitei, M. D., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2013). Lead (II) and cadmium (II) biosorption on Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schleiden biomass. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 1, 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulligan, C. N., Yong, R. N., & Gibbs, B. F. (2001). Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Engineering Geology, 60, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Najafi, M., Rostamian, R., & Rafati, A. A. (2011). Chemically modified silica gel with thiol group as an adsorbent for retention of some toxic soft metal ions from water and industrial effluent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168, 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naqvi, A. H., Hunt, A., Burnett, B. R., & Abraham, J. L. (2008). Pathologic spectrum and lung dust burden in giant cell interstitial pneumonia (hard metal disease/cobalt pneumonitis): review of 100 cases. Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health, 63(2), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pérez-Marín, A. B., Zapata, M., Ortuño, J. F., Aguilar, M., Sáez, J., & Lloréns, M. (2007). Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto orange waste. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 139(1), 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rostamian, R., Najafi, M., & Rafati, A. A. (2011). Synthesis and characterization of thiol-functionalized silica nano hollow sphere as a novel adsorbent for removal of poisonous heavy metal ions from water: kinetics, isotherms and error analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171, 1004–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheela, T., Nayaka, Y. A., Viswanatha, R., Basavanna, S., & Venkatesha, T. G. (2012). Kinetics and thermodynamics studies on the adsorption of Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) from aqueous solution using zinc oxide nanoparticles. Powder Technology, 217, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siddiqui, Z., Jawaid, S. M. A., Vishen, S., & Verma, S. (2015). Remediation of heavy metals contaminated soil and soil washing. i-manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 5(3), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh, A. K., & Cameotra, S. S. (2013). Efficiency of lipopeptide biosurfactants in removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals from contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 7367–7376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siva Kumar, N., Woo, H. S., & Min, K. (2012). Equilibrium and kinetic studies on biosorption of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol from aqueous solutions by Acacia leucocephala bark. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 94, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smičiklas, I., Onjia, A., Raičević, S., Janaćković, Đ., & Mitrić, M. (2008). Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152(2), 876–884.Google Scholar
  39. Srivastava, V. C., Mall, I. D., & Mishra, I. M. (2006). Equilibrium modelling of single and binary adsorption of cadmium and nickel onto bagasse fly ash. Chemical Engineering Journal, 117, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tong, K. S., Kassim, M. J., & Azraa, A. (2011). Adsorption of copper ion from its aqueous solution by a novel biosorbent Uncaria gambir: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 170, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, X.-S., Huang, J., Hu, H.-Q., Wang, J., & Qin, Y. (2007). Determination of kinetic and equilibrium parameters of the batch adsorption of Ni(II) from aqueous solutions by Na-mordenite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142(1–2), 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. WHO (2007). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Vol. 90 human papillomaviruses, World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono90.pdf. Accessed 25 August 2018.Google Scholar
  43. Zhu, Z., Zhang, B., Chen, B., Cai, Q., & Lin, W. (2016). Biosurfactant production by marine-originated bacteria Bacillus subtilis and its application for crude oil removal. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 227, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Applied ScienceMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations