Treatment of Waters Contaminated by Phenol and Cresols in Circulating Packed Bed Bioreactors—Biodegradation and Toxicity Evaluations
Biodegradation of phenol, o-cresol, and p-cresol was evaluated in continuous flow circulating packed bed bioreactors. Effect of loading rate on the removal rate of phenolic compounds was assessed by varying the influent concentration and flow rate. Regardless of the nature of phenolic compounds at a constant concentration, increase of loading rate caused the removal rate to pass through a maximum and then decline. Influent concentrations of 100 and 300 mg L−1 did not affect the removal rates of phenol and p-cresol, but higher rates were obtained at 500 mg L−1. With o-cresol, increase of influent concentration from 100 to 300 mg L−1 enhanced the removal rate but no further enhancement was observed at 500 mg L−1. The maximum removal rates for phenol, o-cresol, and p-cresol were 67.6–97.8, 38.7–73.8, and 77.2–107.2 mg L−1 h−1 at loading rates of 96.7–171.1, 61.6–163.9, and 87.4–183.9 mg L−1 h−1 (hydraulic residence time 2.9, 1.7–1.8, 1.2–2.8 h), respectively. Toxicity examination of untreated influents singled out phenol as the least toxic compound, while o-cresol and p-cresol showed similar toxicities. Treatment of influent containing 100 mg L−1 of phenolic compound led to the highest decrease in toxicity (> 93%) for all three compounds. With influent concentrations of 300 mg L−1 or higher, the decrease in toxicity of treated effluent was highest for phenol, followed by p-cresol, and then o-cresol. Finally, the observed patterns revealed that the toxicity of treated effluent was affected by the extent of biodegradation, as well as the toxic nature of phenolic compound under treatment.
KeywordsPhenol Cresols Biodegradation Circulating packed bed bioreactor Toxicity
Provision of a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council to Yi Zhou is gratefully acknowledged.
This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (Discovery Grants #261376-2013).
- Ailijiang, N., Chang, J., Liang, P., Li, P., Wu, Q., Zhang, X., & Huang, X. (2016). Electrical stimulation on biodegradation of phenol and responses of microbial communities in conductive carriers supported biofilms of the bioelectrochemical reactor. Bioresource Technology., 201, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bansal, V. K., Kumar, R., Prasad, R., & Prasad, S. (2008). Catalytic chemical and electrochemical wet oxidation of phenol using new copper (II) tetraazamacrocycle complexes under homogeneous conditions. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 284(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2007.12.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Box, G. E., Hunter, J. S., & Hunter, W. G. (2005). Statistics for experimenters: design, innovation, and discovery. New York City, NY: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
- Dey, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2013). Performance study and kinetic modeling of hybrid bioreactor for treatment of bi-substrate mixture of phenol-m-cresol in wastewater: process optimization with response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Sciences., 25(4), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60096-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC). (2018). www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/canadian-environmental-protection-act-registry/substances-list/priority-list.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.
- Gupta, V. K., Nayak, A., Agarwal, S., & Tyagi, I. (2014). Potential of activated carbon from waste rubber tire for the adsorption of phenolics: effect of pre-treatment conditions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 417, 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kapałka, A., Fóti, G., & Comninellis, C. (2009). The importance of electrode material in environmental electrochemistry: formation and reactivity of free hydroxyl radicals on boron-doped diamond electrodes. Electrochimica Acta, 54(7), 2018–2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.06.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kurzbaum, E., Raizner, Y., Cohen, O., Suckeveriene, R. Y., Kulikov, A., Hakimi, A., Kruh, L. I., Armon, R., Farber, Y., & Menashe, O. (2017). Encapsulated Pseudomonas putida for phenol biodegradation: use of a structural membrane for construction of a well-organized confined particle. Water Research, 121, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Medel, A., Bustos, E., Esquivel, K., Godínez, L. A., & Meas, Y. (2012). Electrochemical incineration of phenolic compounds from the hydrocarbon industry using boron-doped diamond electrodes. International Journal of Photoenergy, 681875, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/681875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramos, C., Suárez-Ojeda, M. E., & Carrera, J. (2016). Long-term performance and stability of a continuous granular airlift reactor treating a high-strength wastewater containing a mixture of aromatic compounds. Journal of Hazardous Materials., 303, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sabarunisha Begum, S., & Radha, K. V. (2013). Biodegradation kinetic studies on phenol in internal draft tube (inverse fluidized bed) biofilm reactor using Pseudomonas fluorescens: performance evaluation of biofilm and biomass characteristics. Bioremediation Journal, 17(4), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2013.827622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sahariaha, B. P., Anandkumar, J., & Chakraborty, S. (2017). Stability of continuous and fed batch sequential anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic moving bed bioreactor systems at phenol shock load application. Environmental technology. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1343388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saravanan, P., Pakshirajan, K., & Saha, P. (2009). Treatment of phenolics containing synthetic wastewater in an internal loop airlift bioreactor (ILALR) using indigenous mixed strain of Pseudomonas sp. under continuous mode of operation. Bioresource Technology., 100, 4111–4116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/priority-pollutant-list-epa.pdf Accessed 25 Feb 2018.
- Verschueren, K. (2001). Handbook of environmental data on organic chemicals: Vol. 1 (Ed. 4). New York City, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Yaacob, N. S., Mohamad, R., Ahmad, S. A., Abdullah, H., Ibrahim, A. L., & Bin Ariff, A. (2016). The influence of different modes of bioreactor operation on the efficiency of phenol degradation by Rhodococcus UKMP-5M. Rendiconti Lincei Scienze Fisiche e Naturali., 27, 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-016-0567-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar