Advertisement

Biochar from Different Carbonaceous Waste Materials: Ecotoxicity and Effectiveness in the Sorption of Metal(loid)s

  • Mariano Simón
  • Inés García
  • María Diez-Ortiz
  • Verónica González
Article

Abstract

In this study, biochar produced by pyrolysis of urban pruning wood (Bpw) and sewage sludge (Bss) were characterized and investigated as adsorbents for the removal of Cu(II), Pb(II), Zn(II), and As(V) from contaminated solutions. Both types of biochars showed different physical-chemical properties and metal(loid) content. In Bss, Cu, Zn, and Pb concentrations exceeded the upper limit of the common ranges in soils. However, when they were tested for their effect on soil invertebrates, neither of the biochar was expected to exert negative effects as long as the dose applied as an amendment was ≤ 4.8 t ha−1. For an assessment of the effectiveness of biochar in the immobilization of metal(loid)s, three contaminated solutions with acidic pH and different pollutant concentrations were added to both types of biochar. Precipitation as oxy-hydroxides and the formation of complexes with active functional groups of the organic matter were the main mechanisms of metal(loid) fixation by the biochar, with increased precipitation and a rising pH. Both types of biochar were effective at immobilizing Pb and Cu, while Zn showed less effectiveness in this regard and As the least. The high P content of the biochar from sewage sludge favored Pb fixation, presumably forming complexes with phosphates, while competition between phosphate and arsenate ions decreased As adsorption by Fe compounds. The metal(loid)s immobilized by biochar from urban pruning wood were more bioavailable than those fixed by biochar from sewage sludge.

Keywords

Organic waste Biochar Amendment Risk assessment Pollutant immobilization 

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by the Economy and Competitiveness Ministry of Spain and the European Regional Development Fund (Project CGL2013-49009-C3, subprojects CGL2013-49009-C3-2-R and CGL2013-49009-C3-3-R).

References

  1. Adriano, D. C. (2001). Trace elements in the terrestrial environment. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere, 99, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexandratos, V. G., Elzinga, E. J., & Reeder, R. J. (2007). Arsenate uptake by calcite: macroscopic and spectroscopic characterization of adsorption and incorporation mechanisms. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71, 4172–4187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beesley, L., & Marmiroli, M. (2011). The immobilisation and retention of soluble arsenic, cadmium and zinc by biochar. Environmental Pollution, 159, 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, G. R., & Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part I. Physical and mineralogical methods (pp. 363–375). Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Inc..Google Scholar
  6. Bothe, J. V., & Brown, P. W. (1999). The stabilities of calcium arsenates at 23 ± 1°C. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 69, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brick, S. (2010). Biochar: assessing the promise and risks to guide US policy, USA. Natural Resource Defense Council.Google Scholar
  8. Cao, X., & Harris, W. (2010). Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresource Technology, 101, 5222–5228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao, X., Ma, L. Q., Chen, M., Singh, S. P., & Harris, W. G. (2002). Impacts of phosphate amendments on lead biogeochemistry at a contaminated site. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 5296–5304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cao, X., Ma, L., Liang, Y., Gao, B., & Harris, W. (2011). Simultaneous immobilization of lead and atrazine in contaminated soils using dairy-manure biochar. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 4884–4889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng, C. H., Lehmann, J., & Engelhard, M. N. (2008). Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 1598–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Didden, W., & Rombke, J. (2001). Enchytraeids as indicator organisms for chemical stress in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 50, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Domene, X., Ramírez, W., Mattana, S., Alcañiz, J. M., & Andrés, P. (2008). Ecological risk assessment of organic waste amendments using the species sensitivity distribution from a soil organisms test battery. Environmental Pollution, 155, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ECHA. (2008). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.10: Characterization of dose [concentration]-response for environment. European Chemical Agency, 65pp.Google Scholar
  15. Evangelou, V. P. (1998). Environmental soil and water chemistry: Principles and applications. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Fitz, W. J., & Wenzel, W. W. (2002). Arsenic transformations in the soil-rhizospheree-plant system: fundamentals and potential application to phytoremediation. Journal of Biotechnology, 99, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritzsche, A., Rennert, T., & Totsche, K. U. (2011). Arsenic strongly associates with ferrihydrite colloids formed in a soil effluent. Environmental Pollution, 159, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gai, X., Wang, H., Liu, J., Zhai, L., Liu, S., Ren, T., & Liu, H. (2014). Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on biochar adsorption of ammonium and nitrate. PLoS One, 9(12), e113888.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002). Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with biochar—a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. González, V., García, I., del Moral, F., & Simón, M. (2012). Effectiveness of amendments on the spread and phytotoxicity of contaminants in metal–arsenic polluted soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 205–206, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartley, W., Edwards, R., & Lepp, N. W. (2004). Arsenic and heavy metal mobility in iron oxide-amended contaminated soils as evaluated by short- and long-term leaching tests. Environmental Pollution, 131, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartley, W., Dickinson, N. M., Riby, P., & Lepp, N. W. (2009). Arsenic mobility in brownfield soils amended with greenwaste compost or biochar and planted with Miscanthus. Environmental Pollution, 157, 2654–2662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoekstra, J. A., & Van Ewijk, P. H. (1993). Alternatives for the no-observed-effect level. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ippolito, J. A., Strawn, D. C., Scheckel, K. G., Novak, J. M., Ahmedena, M., & Niandou, M. A. S. (2012). Macroscopic and molecular investigations of copper sorption by a steam-activate biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, 150–156.Google Scholar
  25. Jager, T., Heugens, E. H. W., & Kooijman, S. A. L. M. (2006). Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models. Ecotoxicology, 15, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jain, A., Raven, K. P., & Loepert, R. H. (1999). Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: surface charge reduction and net OH-release stoichiometric. Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 1179–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones Jr., J. B. (1991). Kjeldahl method for nitrogen (N) determination. Athens: Micro-Macro Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Kononova, M. M. (1966). Soil organic matter. Its nature, its role in soil formation and in soil fertility (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In J. Lehmann & S. Joseph (Eds.), Biochar for environmental management science and technology (pp. 1–12). UK: Earthscans.Google Scholar
  30. Lehmann, J., Skjemstad, J., Sohi, S., Carter, J., Barson, M., Falloon, P., Coleman, K., Woodbury, P., & Krull, A. E. (2008). Australian climate–carbon cycle feedback reduced by soil black carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1, 832–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindsay, W. L. (2001). Chemical equilibria in soils. New Jersey: The Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lu, H., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., Huang, X., Wang, S., & Oiu, R. (2012). Relative distribution of Pb2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar. Water Research, 46, 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mingorance, M. D., Barahona, E., & Fernández-Gálvez, J. (2007). Guidelines for improving organic carbon recovery by the wet oxidation method. Chemosphere, 68, 409–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohan, D., Pittman Jr., C. U., Bricka, M., Smith, F., Yancey, B., Mohammad, J., Steele, P. H., Alexandre-Franco, M. F., Gómez-Serrano, V., & Gong, H. (2007). Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 310, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moon, D. H., Dermantas, D., & Menounou, N. (2004). Arsenic immobilization by calcium-arsenic precipitates in lime treated soil. Science of the Total Environment, 330, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moser, H., & Römbke, J. (2009). Ecotoxicological characterization of waste—results and experiences of an international ring test. Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Mukherjee, A., Zimmerman, A. R., & Harris, W. (2011). Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma, 163, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Namgay, T., Singh, B., & Singh, B. P. (2010). Influence of biochar application to soil on the availability of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn to maize (Zea mays L.). Australian Journal of Soil Research, 48, 638–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD 220. (2004) Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Test 220: Enchytraeid reproduction test.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070301
  40. Pais, I., & Benton Jr., J. (2000). The handbook of trace elements. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  41. Park, J. H., Choppala, G., Lee, S. J., Bolan, N., Chung, J. W., & Edraki, M. (2013). Comparative sorption of Pb and Cd by biochars and its implication for metal immobilization in soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 224(12), 1711–1711.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1711-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pituello, C., Francioso, O., Simonetti, G., Pisi, A., Torreggiani, A., Berti, A., & Norari, F. (2015). Characterization of chemical-physical, structural and morphological properties of biochars from biowastes produced at different temperatures. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15, 792–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pokrovsky, O. S., & Scott, J. (2002). Surface chemistry and dissolution kinetics of divalent metals carbonates. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qadeer, S., Anjum, M., Khalid, A., Waqas, M., Batool, A., & Mahmood, T. (2017). A dialoque on perspectives of biochar applications and its environmental risks. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 228(281).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3428-z.
  45. Rhoades, J. D. (1982). Cation exchange capacity. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 149–157). Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Inc..Google Scholar
  46. Sánchez España, J., López Pamo, E., Santofimia, E., Aduvire, O., Reyes, J., & Barettino, D. (2005). Acid mine drainage in the Iberian Pyrite Belt (Odiel river watershed, Huelva, SW Spain): geochemistry, mineralogy and environmental implications. Applied Geochemistry, 20, 1320–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shelmerdine, P. A., Black, C. R., MacGrath, S. P., & Toung, S. D. (2009). Modelling phytoremediation by the hyperaccumulating fern, Pteris vittata, of soils historically contaminated with arsenic. Environmental Pollution, 157, 1589–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sherman, D. M., & Randall, S. R. (2003). Surface complexation of arsenic (V) to iron (III) (hydr)oxides: structural mechanism from ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67, 4223–4230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simón, M., Martín, F., García, I., Bouza, P., Dorronsoro, C., & Aguilar, J. (2005). Interaction of limestone grains and acidic solutions from the oxidation of pyrite tailings. Environmental Pollution, 135, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simón, M., García, I., González, V., Romero, A., & Martín, F. (2015). Effect of grain size and heavy metals on As immobilization by marble particles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 6835–6841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sohi, S. P. (2012). Carbon storage with benefits. Science, 338, 1034–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spokas, K. A. (2010). Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O: C molar ratio. Carbon Management, 1(2), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Szabó, T., Tombáez, E., Illés, E., & Dékány, I. (2006). Enhance acidity and pH-dependent surface charge characterization of successively oxidized graphite oxides. Carbon, 44, 537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thanabalasingan, P., & Pickering, W. F. (1986). Arsenic sorption by humic acids. Environmental Pollution, 12, 233–246.Google Scholar
  55. The European Parliament and the Council of the EU. (2002). Decision No 1666/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 Laying Down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. The European Parliament and the Council of the EU, Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  56. Tong, S. J., Li, J. Y., Yuan, J. H., & Xu, R. K. (2011). Adsorption of Cu(II) by biochars generated from three crop straws. Chemical Engineering Journal, 172, 828–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. US Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of Saline and Alkali soils. Handbook 60. Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  58. Verheijen, F., Jeffery, S., Bastos, A. C., van der Velde, M., & Diafas, I. (2010). Biochar application to soils: a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties processes and functions. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  59. Vithanage, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Ahmad, M., Shinogi, Y., Kim, K., Kim, G., & Ok, Y. S. (2016). Biochar for waste management and environmental sustainability. In J. W. C. Wong, R. Y. Surampalli, T. C. Zhang, R. D. Tyagi, & A. Selvam (Eds.), Sustainable solid waste (pp. 273–291). Reston: ASCE Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wenzel, W. W., Kirchbaumer, N., Prohaska, T., Stingeder, G., Lombi, E., & Adriano, D. C. (2001). Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Analytica Chimica Acta, 436, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams, D. E. (1949). A rapid manometric method for determination of carbonate in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 13, 127–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu, Y., Schwart, F. W., Jardine, P. M., Basta, N. T., & Casteel, S. W. (2002). Treatment of acidic-mine water with calcite and quartz. Environmental Engineering Science, 14, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zheng, R.-L., Cai, C., Liang, J.-H., Huang, Q., Chen, Z., Huang, Y.-Z., Harp, H. P., & Sun, G.-X. (2012). The effects of biochars from rice residues on the formation of iron plaque and the accumulation of Cd, Zn, Pb, As in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere, 89, 856–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Agronomía, Área de Ciencia del Suelo, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario ceiA3Universidad de Almería CITE IIBAlmeríaSpain
  2. 2.LEITAT Technological CenterBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations