Comparison of Sharp Interface to Variable Density Models in Pumping Optimisation of Coastal Aquifers
- 41 Downloads
A number of models have been developed to simulate seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers, which differ in the accuracy level and computational demands, based on the approximation level of the application. In this paper, four seawater intrusion models are employed to calculate the optimal pumping rates in a coastal aquifer management problem. The first model considers both fluid flow and solute transport processes and assumes a variable-density transition zone between saltwater and freshwater. The implementation of the model in simulation-optimisation routines is impractical, due to the computational time required for the simulation. The second model neglects the dispersion mechanism and assumes a sharp interface between saltwater and freshwater. The sharp interface model is significantly faster than the variable density model, however, it may introduce errors in the estimation of the seawater intrusion extent. The remaining two models are modifications of the second model, which intent to correct the inaccuracies of the simplified sharp interface approximation. All four models are utilised to simulate an unconfined coastal aquifer with multiple pumping wells and an optimisation method is used to calculate the maximum allowed pumping rates. The optimisation results are then analysed, in order to examine if the three sharp interface models could provide feasible solutions in the area of the variable density optimum, which is considered as a benchmark solution.
KeywordsSharp interface models SEAWAT Pumping optimization Coastal aquifer Seawater intrusion
A previous shorter version of the paper has been presented in the 10th World Congress of EWRA Panta Rei Athens, Greece, 5-9 July 2017. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments in improving the paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors would like to declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Cheng D, Ouazar D (1999) Analytical solutions: In: Seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers—concepts, methods and practices (pp. 163–191). Springer NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Christelis V, Mantoglou A (2018) Pumping Optimization of Coastal Aquifers Using Seawater Intrusion Models of Variable-Fidelity and Evolutionary Algorithms. Water Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2116-0
- Dausman A, Langevin C, Bakker M, Schaars F (2010) A comparison between SWI and SEAWAT—the importance of dispersion, inversion and vertical anisotropy. 21st Salt Water Intrusion Meeting, Gov. of Azores, AzoresGoogle Scholar
- Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D (2002) An evolutionary annealing-simplex algorithm for global optimization of water resource systems. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Cardiff, UK, International Water Association Publishing 2:1423–1428Google Scholar
- Essaid HI, (1999) USGS SHARP Model. In Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers—Concepts, Methods and Practices (pp. 213–247). Springer NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Guo W, Langevin CD (2002) User’s guide to SEWAT: A Computer Program for Simulation of Three – Dimentional Variable – Density Ground - Water Flow, BOOK 6, Chapter A7, Techniques of Water – Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, 7–18Google Scholar
- Karatzas GP, Dokou Z (2015) Optimal management of saltwater intrusion in the coastal aquifer of Malia, Crete (Greece) using particle swarm optimization. Hydrogeol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1286-6
- Pool M, Carrera J (2011) A correction factor to account for mixing in Ghyben-Herzberg and critical pumping rate approximations of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010256
- Ranjbar A, Mahjouri N (2018) Development of an efficient surrogate model based on aquifer dimensions to prevent seawater intrusion in anisotropic coastal aquifers, case study: the Qom aquifer in Iran. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7592-2
- Werner AD (2017) Correction factor to account for dispersion in sharp-interface models of terrestrial freshwater lenses and active seawater intrusion. Adv Water Resour 102:45–52Google Scholar