Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Risk Management of Drinking Water Supply in Critical Conditions Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE V Technique

Abstract

Water crisis management in drinking water supply systems is a crucial issue. Many different natural and unnatural disasters cause great damages to these systems. Prioritizing effective strategies by expert decision-makers before any incidence can greatly reduce this damage. Moreover, cost minimization in the provision of these strategies is very essential as the urban crisis management organizations are financially limited. Therefore, this study provided a model for the selection of the most appropriate drinking water supply strategies in crisis conditions, considering possible limitations. Fuzzy PROMTHEE V, a multi-criteria decision-making method, is a new approach developed in this research to help the decision-makers in selecting a set of possible alternatives for drinking water supply management, which are ranked based on five criteria determined by decision-makers (water supply reliability, implementation speed and simplicity, implementation cost, social satisfaction, water quality) and budget limitation as the constraint for the optimization problem. This model was applied in a case study of Tehran city in Iran. Due to the uncertainties in expert opinions and parameters needed for drinking water supply risk management, this model was solved with three fuzzy methods and one non-fuzzy method, and the results were compared. Findings showed that strengthening passive defense in water supply, transportation, and distribution systems; providing water consumption management; encouraging people to save water for emergency conditions and planning to exploit popular forces and performing maneuvers are top-ranked alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Multi Criteria Decision Making

  2. 2.

    Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations

  3. 3.

    Analytic Hierarchy Process

References

  1. Abu-Taleb MF, Mareschal B (1995) Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multi criteria method. Eur J Oper Res 81(3):500–511

  2. Adachi T, Ellingwood BR (2008) Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(1):78–88

  3. Aihara Y, Shrestha S, Rajbhandari S, Bhattarai AP, Bista N, Kazama F, Shindo J (2018) Resilience in household water systems and quality of life after the earthquake: a mixed-methods study in urban Nepal. Water Policy 20(5):1013–1026.https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2018.117

  4. Allahviranloo T, Lotfi FH, Kiasary MK, Kiani NA, Alizadeh L (2008) Solving fully fuzzy linear programming problem by the ranking function. Appl Math Sci 2(1):19–32

  5. Bagheri A, Darijani M, Asgary A, Morid S (2010) Crisis in urban water systems during the reconstruction period: a system dynamics analysis of alternative policies after the 2003 earthquake in bam-Iran. Water Resour Manag 24(11):2567–2596

  6. Bashiri M, Sherafati M (2012) A three echelons supply chain network design in a fuzzy environment considering inequality constraints. International constraints in engineering and engineering management (IEEM), pp 293–297

  7. Baykasoğlu A, Subulan K (2015) An analysis of fully fuzzy linear programming with fuzzy decision variables through logistics network design problem. Knowl-Based Syst 90:165–184

  8. Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 200(1):198–215

  9. Bellman RE, Zadeh LA (1970) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag Sci 17(4):B-141

  10. Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238

  11. Cambrainha GM, Fontana ME (2018) A multi-criteria decision making approach to balance water supply-demand strategies in water supply systems. Production 28

  12. EPA (1993) Emergency Disinfection of Drinking Water, EPA 810-F-93-002

  13. Farhadinia B (2014) Solving fuzzy linear programming problems with linear membership functions-revisited. Caspian Journal of Mathematical Sciences (CJMS) 3(2):317–328

  14. Fontana ME, Morais DC (2013) Using Promethee V to select alternatives so as to rehabilitate water supply network with detected leaks. Water Resour Manag 27(11):4021–4037

  15. Gogus O, Boucher TO (1998) Strong transitivity, rationality and weak monotonicity in fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94(1):133–144

  16. Hajkowicz S, Higgins A (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):255–265

  17. Hasani N, Mosalman Yazdi H (2016) Determining effective criteria in locating emergency water tanks and calculating their weighted importance factors byAnalytical hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Tehran Disaster Management and Mitigation Organization (TDMMO) 6(3):264–272

  18. Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Ebrahimi A (2011) A fully fuzzified data envelopment analysis model. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences 3(3):252–264

  19. Hsieh TY, Lu ST, Tzeng GH (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tender’s selection in public office buildings. Int J Proj Manag 22(7):573–584

  20. Jahani HR, Reyhani M (2007) Role of groundwater in Tehran water crisis mitigation. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, pp 115

  21. Kamodkar RU, Regulwar DG (2013) Multipurpose reservoir operating policies: a fully fuzzy linear programming approach. J Agric Sci Technol 15(6):1261–1274

  22. Kariuki SG, Löwe K (2007) Integrating human factors into process hazard analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92(12):1764–1773

  23. Kuang H, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2012) Evaluation of source water protection strategies in Waterloo region based on Grey systems theory and PROMETHEE II. In: Systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), 2012 IEEE international conference on. IEEE, pp 2775–2779

  24. Kumar A, Kaur J, Singh P (2011) A new method for solving fully fuzzy linear programming problems. Appl Math Model 35(2):817–823

  25. Le Téno JF, Mareschal B (1998) An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products' design with ill-defined data on environmental quality. Eur J Oper Res 109(2):522–529

  26. Liu CP, Sheu BH (2007) Effects of the 921 earthquake on the water quality in the upper stream at the Guandaushi experimental forest. Water Air Soil Pollut 179(1–4):19–27

  27. Lolli F, Ishizaka A, Gamberini R, Rimini B, Ferrari AM, Marinelli S, Savazza R (2016) Waste treatment: an environmental, economic and social analysis with a new group fuzzy PROMETHEE approach. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18(5):1317–1332

  28. Malekmohammadi B, Nazariha M, Hesari N (2013) Emergency response planning for providing drinking water in urban areas after natural disasters using multi criteria decision making methods. In: 13th edition of the world wide workshop for young environmental scientists (WWW-YES-2013)-urban waters: resource or risks? (no. 07). HAL-ENPC

  29. Mareschal B, Brans JP, Macharis C (1998) The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure: a PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support (no. 2013/9373). ULB--UniversiteLibre de Bruxelles

  30. Morais DC, de Almeida AT (2007) Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(2):441–459

  31. Nasiri H, Boloorani AD, Sabokbar HAF, Jafari HR, Hamzeh M, Rafii Y (2013) Determining the most suitable areas for artificial groundwater recharge via an integrated PROMETHEE II-AHP method in GIS environment (case study: Garabaygan Basin, Iran). Environ Monit Assess 185(1):707–718

  32. Özelkan EC, Duckstein L (1996) Analyzing water resources alternatives and handling criteria by multi criterion decision techniques. J Environ Manag 48(1):69–96

  33. Pagano A, Pluchinotta I, Giordano R, Petrangeli AB, Fratino U, Vurro M (2018) Dealing with uncertainty in decision-making for drinking water supply systems exposed to extreme events. Water Resour Manag 32(6):2131–2145

  34. Patil SK, Kant R (2014) A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of knowledge management adoption in supply chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):679–693

  35. Roozbahani A, Zahraie B, Tabesh M (2012) PROMETHEE with precedence order in the criteria (PPOC) as a new group decision making aid: an application in urban water supply management. Water Resour Manag 26(12):3581–3599

  36. Roozbahani A, Zahraie B, Tabesh M (2013) Integrated risk assessment of urban water supply systems from source to tap. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27(4):923–944

  37. Rose A, Liao SY (2005) Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. J Reg Sci 45(1):75–112

  38. Segrave AA, van der Zouwen MM, van Vierssen WW (2014) Water planning: from what time perspective? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 86:157–167

  39. Sugeno M (1985) An introductory survey of fuzzy control. Inf Sci 36(1–2):59–83

  40. Tlili Y, Nafi A (2012) A practical decision scheme for the prioritization of water pipe replacement. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 12(6):895–917

  41. Tscheikner-Gratl F, Egger P, Rauch W, Kleidorfer M (2017) Comparison of multi-criteria decision support methods for integrated rehabilitation prioritization. Water 9(2):68

  42. Vulević T, Dragović N (2017) Multi-criteria decision analysis for sub-watersheds ranking via the PROMETHEE method. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 5(1):50–55

  43. WHO (2005) Managing water in the home: accelerated health gains from improved water supply

  44. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

  45. Zarghami M, Ehsani I (2011) Evaluation of different group multi-criteria decision making methods in selection of water transfer projects to Urmia Lake Basin. Journal of IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH 2(20):1–14

  46. Zolfaghari MR, Niari MA (2009) Probabilistic seismic damage assessment for water supply networks following earthquake. In: TCLEE 2009: lifeline earthquake engineering in a multi hazard environment, pp 1–11

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tehran Water and Wastewater Company for providing technical assistance and data for this research.

Author information

Correspondence to Abbas Roozbahani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghandi, M., Roozbahani, A. Risk Management of Drinking Water Supply in Critical Conditions Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE V Technique. Water Resour Manage 34, 595–615 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02460-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Risk management
  • Drinking water supply
  • PROMETHEE V
  • Fuzzy theory
  • Multi criteria decision making