Site Selection of Different Irrigation Systems Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process Integrated with GIS in a Semi-Arid Region

  • Lamya Neissi
  • Mohammad AlbajiEmail author
  • Saeed Boroomand Nasab


Site selection of different irrigation systems can lead to higher water productivity in drought conditions. The present study intends to evaluate suitable regions along the Izeh plain (Iran) for different pressurized and gravitational irrigation systems using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on Geographic Information System (GIS). To that end, a variety of inputs such as climate, topography, skilled labor and system costs, etc. were identified and classified into two main categories of socio-economic and environmental criteria. Each criterion was subdivided into several criteria to make the site selection more specific. A matrix of the pair-wise comparison was, in turn, used to compare these criteria and sub-criteria, and to evaluate them based on their relative importance based on the region’s suitability for different irrigation system alternatives. Geographical layers were then obtained for each sub-criterion to select the most suitable sites for different irrigation systems in the study area. Pressurized irrigation systems including wheel move irrigation system, drip irrigation system and solid-set sprinkler irrigation system, together with gravitational irrigation systems consisting of surface irrigation system, and low-pressure irrigation system were considered as irrigation system alternatives during the site selection process in this study. The result map of site selection for different alternatives showed that surface irrigation, drip irrigation and low pressure systems were the best irrigation system alternatives for the region studied.


Water resource Drip irrigation Water management Environment 



We are grateful to the Research Council of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz for financial support (GN: 95/3/02/31400).


  1. Abdollahzadeh G, Damalas CA, Sharifzadeh MS, Ahmadi-Gorgi H (2016) Selecting strategies for rice stem borer management using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Crop Prot 84:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abyaneh HZ, Jovzi M, Albaji M (2017) Effect of regulated deficit irrigation, partial root drying and N-fertilizer levels on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris L.). Agric Water Manag 194:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso JA, Lamata MT (2006) Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int J Unc Fuz Knowledge-Based Syst 14(4):445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anane M, Bouziri L, Limam A, Jellali S (2012) Ranking suitable sites for irrigation with reclaimed water in the Nabeul-Hammamet region (Tunisia) using GIS and AHP-multicriteria decision analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 65: 36-46.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous (2017) Meteorology report of Izeh plain, Iran (in Persian). Khuzestan Water and Power Authority (KWPA)
  6. Assefa T, Jha M, Reyes M, Srinivasan R, Worqlul AW (2018) Assessment of suitable areas for home gardens for irrigation potential, water availability, and water-lifting technologies. Water J 10(4):495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baffoe G (2019) Exploring the utility of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries. Eval Prog Plan 72:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandio IA, Matori AN, Lawal DU, Sabri S (2011) GIS-based land suitability analysis using AHP for public parks planning in Larkana city. Modern Appl Sci 5(4):177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coyle G (2004) The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Practical Strategy. Open Access Material. AHPGoogle Scholar
  10. Dekamin M, Barmaki M, Kanooni A (2018) Selecting the best environmental friendly oilseed crop by using life cycle assessment, water footprint and analytic hierarchy process methods. J Cleaner Pro 198:1239–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ESRI (2003) Using Arc GIS Geostatistical Analyst, Printed in the USA Johan Z, KrivyM (1969) Geological map of Tunisia (Bouficha) scale 1:50 000. Sheet No 36.Geological Service of TunisiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013) Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: a multi criteria evaluation approach using GIS. J Envi Plan Manag 56(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia JL, Alvarado A, Blanco J, Jimenez E, Maldonado AA, Corte G (2014) Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an analytic hierarchy process. Comp Elect Agr 100:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Montazar A, Zadbagher E (2010) An analytical hierarchy model for assessing global water productivity of irrigation networks in Iran. Water Res Manag 24:2817–2832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Naseri AA, Albaji M, Khajeh Sahoti GR, Sharifi S, Sarafraz A, Eghbali MR(2009) Investigation of soil quality for different irrigation systems in Baghe Plain, Iran. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. Vol.7 (2): 7 1 3–7 1 7. 2 0 0 9Google Scholar
  16. Pan H, Xu Q (2018) Quantitative analysis on the influence factors of the sustainable water resource management performance in irrigation areas: an empirical research from China. Int J Sustain Hum Secur 10(1):264Google Scholar
  17. Phonphoton N, Pharino C (2019) Multi-criteria decision analysis to mitigate the impact of municipal solid waste management services during floods. Res Cons Rec 146:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rezania AR, Naseri AA, Albaji M (2009) Assessment of soil properties for irrigation methods in North Andimeshk Plain, Iran. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment .Vol.7 (3&4): 7 2 8–7 3 3. 2 0 0 9Google Scholar
  19. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure. J Math Psyc 15:228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Seejata K, Yodying A, Wongthadam T, Mahavik N, Tantanee S (2018) Assessment of flood hazard areas using analytical hierarchy process over the lower Yom Basin, Sukhothai Province. Procedia Engineering 212:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharma YK, Yadav AK, Mangla SK, Patil PP (2018) Ranking the success factors to improve safety and security in sustainable food supply chain management using fuzzy AHP. Mat Proc 5(5):12187–12196Google Scholar
  23. Werner A, Werner A, Wieland R, Kersebaum KC, Wiggering H (2014) Ex ante assessment of crop rotations focusing on energy crops using a multi-attribute decision-making method. Ecol Indic 45:110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Msc Student of Irrigation and Drainage, Irrigation and Drainage Department, Faculty of Water Sciences EngineeringShahid Chamran University of AhvazAhvazIran
  2. 2.Assistant Professor of Irrigation and Drainage, Irrigation and Drainage Department, Faculty of Water Sciences EngineeringShahid Chamran University of AhvazAhvazIran
  3. 3.Professors of Irrigation and Drainage, Irrigation and Drainage Department, Faculty of Water Sciences EngineeringShahid Chamran University of AhvazAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations