Advertisement

Developing a Closed-Loop Water Conservation System at Micro Level Through Circular Economy Approach

  • Mousumi RoyEmail author
  • Lassi Linnanen
  • Sankha Chakrabortty
  • Parimal PalEmail author
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

A closed loop system for micro-level conservation of fresh water at household user point has been developed in this work in a comprehensive circular economy (CE) framework encompassing technical, environmental and economic aspects in a concurrent manner. The system has been developed through field survey of households in an urban setting in Indian context and experimental investigation on membrane filtration and recirculation of grey water generated from domestic use like cooking, bathing, washing etc. Pollution load of the grey water utilized in the sample involved high alkalinity (pH = 9.00), total suspended solid (TSS = 536 mg/L), odour (TON 2). Membrane based filtration process has been developed to ensure that the reclaimed water is of acceptable quality as alkalinity decreases to 7.2, TSS reduces to 95 mg per litre and odour in terms of TON reduces to one. Economic feasibility of implementing such a system is assessed by cost benefit analysis. Estimated annualized total cost (capital and operating) for treating and reusing a cubic meter of waste water in this CE framework amounts to US $1.5 only. Preference score derived from utility estimates of conjoint analysis (CA) reveal that consumers have positive attitude to accept water conservation strategy in circular economy framework. The ideal composition of reclaimed grey water to be preferred is odourless (TON value near 1), low TSS (less than 102 mg/L) and neutral pH (nearly7.00) The study reveals that about half of fresh water demand per day per capita can be saved by developing a closed-loop production system at micro level, where grey water generated as waste from domestic use is not discharged as followed in traditional open-ended economic model. Instead of take-make-use-discharge, waste water is added in the production system as a resource. After applying an advanced cost-effective clean technology, grey water is kept in a material loop and usage creating further value for a longer period. Sustainable water system development by this holistic circular water conservation approach is no longer an option but a necessity to protect the life-sustaining valuable freshwater resource. Developing water conservation system in closed-loop model provides a novel solution as it will yield positive and significant utility and economic value in a very cost effective green design.

Keywords

Grey water Circular Economy Recycling water Sustainable management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for DST-Inspire Fellowship to one of the authors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest in this submission.

References

  1. Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioural interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am Econ Rev 104(10):3003–3037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Farizo B, Hanley N (2002) Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms, An example from Spain. Energy Policy 30:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An IY, Lee YL, Kim J-H (2014) A study of the characteristics of a super water saving toilet with flexible trap way by measuring accumulated flow rate. J Mech Sci Technol 28:3067–3074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baarsma B (2003) The valuation of Ijmeer nature reserve using conjoint analysis. Environ Resour Econ 25:343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and application. Sci Total Environ 365:105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruvold WH (1988) Public opinion on water reuse options. Water Pollution Control Federation 60(1):45–49Google Scholar
  7. Casey JF, Kahn JR, Rivas A (2006) Willingness to pay for improved water services in Manaus. Amazon Brazil. Ecol Econ 58:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrod GD, Willis KG (1997) The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study. Ecol Econ 21:45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hair J, Anderson R, Tathan R, Black W (1998) Conjoint Analysis, Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, London, pp 387–441Google Scholar
  10. Hranova R (2010) Application of a system approach and optimisation of different alternatives in practice of decentralised wastewater reuse. Civ Eng Environ Syst 27(4):281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Juster TF (1966) Consumer buying intention and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design. American Statistical Association Journal:658–696Google Scholar
  12. Kumar R, Pal P (2012) Response surface-optimized Fenton’s pre-treatment for chemical precipitation for struvite and recycling of water through downstream of nanofiltration. Chem Eng J 210:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar R, Pal P (2013) Membrane-integrated hybrid bioremediation of industrial waste water:a continuous treatment and recycling approach. Desalination and Water Reuse 3(1):26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74:132–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehmann DR, Gupta S, Steckel JH (1998) Marketing Research. Addision-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu L, Deller D, Hviid M (2019) Price and Behavioural Signal to Encourage Household Water Conservation: Implications for the UK. Water Resour Manag 33:475–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu Y, Bai Y (2014) An exploration of firm’s awareness and behaviour of developing circular economy: an empirical research in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 87:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Louvarie JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods, analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mc Fadden D (1986) The choice theory approach to market research. Mark Sci 5(4):275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meseguer EG, Bernabe-Crespo MB, Gomez-Espin JM (2019) Recycled Sewage: A Water Resource for Dry Regions of Southeastern Spain. Water Resour Manag 33(2):725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Padhke MS (1989) Quality Engineering using robust design. PTR Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Rover, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Park JY, Chertow MR (2014) Establishing and testing the “reuse potential” indicator for managing wastes as resources. J Environ Manag 137:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roy M (2010) Managing the village level open access water resources in a region facing rapidly declining water availability. Environ Dev Sustain 12(6):999–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tang SL, Yue DPT, Ku DCC (2007) Engineering and costs of dual water supply systems. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Thakura R, Chakrabortty S, Pal P (2015) Treating Complex Industrial Wastewater in a New Membrane-integrated, Closed Loop system for Recovery and Reuse. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17(8):2299–2310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Telser H, Zweifel P (2002) Measuring willingness to pay for risk reduction: An application of conjoint analysis. Health Econ 11:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Pol RM (1996) Using conjoint analysis to establish consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables. Br Food J 98(8):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesNational Institute of TechnologyDurgapurIndia
  2. 2.Energy & Environmental TechnologyLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland
  3. 3.Environment & Membrane Technology Laboratory, Department of Chemical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyDurgapurIndia

Personalised recommendations