Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 33, Issue 10, pp 3523–3545 | Cite as

Flooding Control and Hydro-Energy Assessment for Urban Stormwater Drainage Systems under Climate Change: Framework Development and Case Study

  • Huan-Feng DuanEmail author
  • Xichao Gao
Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Flooding issue and energy shortage have become the common concerns impeding the urban development under climate change scenarios. Exploiting potential hydro-energy from urban stormwater drainage system (USDS) has multiple beneficial perspectives for controlling flooding, relieving energy shortage and mitigating the greenhouse gases emission, which has not yet been systematically investigated in previous works. In this paper, a systematical analysis framework is developed to design the flooding risk control measures and to assess the feasibility and capacity of the hydro-energy development in USDS. The GCMs and HBV models, integrated within the SWMM computation platform, are adopted to simulate the hydrological and hydraulic processes during rainfall events, with the results used to manage the flooding situation and evaluate the energy generation capacity under the influences of both historical and future climate changes. The framework is then applied to a practical case in Tung Chung town of Hong Kong. The analysis result shows that, in the studied area, it is significant and worthwhile to develop the hydro-energy in USDS, which is evidenced to be beneficial to the energy generation and the flooding risk control as well as water resources management in the urban drainage system. The developed method and obtained results of this study may provide a new perspective and technical guide for effective USDS management and operation.

Keywords

Climate change Detention tank Flooding control Hydro-energy Urban stormwater drainage system (USDS) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the research grants from: (1) the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) under projects no. 25200616 and no. 15201017; and (2) the Hong Kong Polytechnic University under projects no. 1-ZVGF and 1-ZVCD.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aikawa M, Hiraki T, Eiho J (2009) Change of atmospheric condition in an urbanized area of Japan from the viewpoint of rainfall intensity. Environ Monit Assess 148(1–4):449–453Google Scholar
  2. Anandhi A, Frei A, Pierson DC, Schneiderman EM, Zion MS, Lounsbury D, Matonse AH (2011) Examination of change factor methodologies for climate change impact assessment. Water Resour Res 47(3):W03501Google Scholar
  3. Bailey TP, Bass RB (2009). Hydroelectric feasibility study: an assessment of the feasibility of generating electric power using urban storm water in Oregon City, Oregon Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartos MD, Chester MV (2015) Impacts of climate change on electric power supply in the Western United States. Nat Clim Chang 5(8):748–752Google Scholar
  5. Bayazıt Y, Bakış R, Koç C (2017) An investigation of small scale hydropower plants using the geographic information system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:289–294Google Scholar
  6. Bergström S (1992). The HBV model: its structure and applications, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological InstituteGoogle Scholar
  7. Bousquet C, Samora I, Manso P, Rossi L, Heller P, Schleiss AJ (2017) Assessment of hydropower potential in wastewater systems and application to Switzerland. Renew Energy 113Google Scholar
  8. Burszta-Adamiak E, Mrowiec M (2013) Modelling of green roofs' hydrologic performance using EPA's SWMM. Water Sci Technol 68(1):36–42Google Scholar
  9. Chan K, Tam K, Leung Y (2010). Integrated planning and design of a flood relief project for sheung wan low-lying area. HKIE Civil division Conference - nfrastructure Solutions for Tomorrow, 12–14 April 2010, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang X, Liu X, Zhou W (2010) Hydropower in China at present and its further development. Energy 35(11):4400–4406Google Scholar
  11. Chen H (2013a) Projected change in extreme rainfall events in China by the end of the 21st century using CMIP5 models. Chin Sci Bull 58(12):1462–1472Google Scholar
  12. Chen H (2013b) Projected change in extreme rainfall events in China by the end of the 21st century using CMIP5 models. Chin Sci Bull 10:1007Google Scholar
  13. Chen J, Yang HX, Liu CP, Lau CH, Lo M (2013) A novel vertical axis water turbine for power generation from water pipelines. Energy 54(2):184–193Google Scholar
  14. DeNooyer TA, Peschel JM, Zhang Z, Stillwell AS (2016) Integrating water resources and power generation: the energy–water nexus in Illinois. Appl Energy 162:363–371Google Scholar
  15. DSDHK (Drainage Services Department of Hong Kong Government) (2017) Gateway Website: http://www.dsd.gov.hk/EN/Home/index.html. (accessed on Oct 2017)
  16. Du J, Yang H, Shen Z, Chen J (2017) Micro hydro power generation from water supply system in high rise buildings using pump as turbines. EnergyGoogle Scholar
  17. Duan H-F, Li F, Tao T (2016) Multi-objective optimal design of detention tanks in the urban stormwater drainage system: uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Water Resour Manag 30(7):2213–2226Google Scholar
  18. Dursun B, Gokcol C (2011) The role of hydroelectric power and contribution of small hydropower plants for sustainable development in Turkey. Renew Energy 36(4):1227–1235Google Scholar
  19. Fernández-Blanco R, Kavvadias K, Hidalgo González I (2017) Quantifying the water-power linkage on hydrothermal power systems: a Greek case study. Appl Energy 203:240–253Google Scholar
  20. Fortier C, Mailhot A (2015) Climate change impact on combined sewer overflows. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(5):04014073Google Scholar
  21. HKO (Hong Kong Observatory) (2017) Gateway Website: http://www.hko.gov.hk/contente.htm. (assessed on Oct 2017)
  22. Huang H, Yan Z (2009) Present situation and future prospect of hydropower in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(6–7):1652–1656Google Scholar
  23. Huong HTL, Pathirana A (2013) Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city, Vietnam. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(1):379–394Google Scholar
  24. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report.pdf>, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]: 151Google Scholar
  25. Jang S, Cho M, Yoon J, Yoon Y, Kim S, Kim G, Kim L, Aksoy H (2007) Using SWMM as a tool for hydrologic impact assessment. Desalination 212(1–3):344–356Google Scholar
  26. Kamal NA, Park H, Shin S (2014) Assessing the viability of microhydropower generation from the stormwater flow of the detention outlet in an urban area. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 14(4):664Google Scholar
  27. Kobold M, Brilly M (2006) The use of HBV model for flash flood forecasting. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 6(3):407–417Google Scholar
  28. Li F, Duan H-F, Yan H, Tao T (2015) Multi-objective optimal design of detention tanks in the urban stormwater drainage system: framework development and case study. Water Resour Manag 29(7):2125–2137Google Scholar
  29. Liu J, Guo L-h, Zhang J, Lv T (2006) Study on simulation of drainage and flooding in urban areas of shanghai based on improved SWMM. China water & wastewater 22(21):64–66Google Scholar
  30. Lydon T, Coughlan P, McNabola A (2017). "Pump-as-turbine: characterization as an energy recovery device for the water distribution network." J Hydraul Eng: 04017020Google Scholar
  31. Madsen H, Lawrence D, Lang M, Martinkova M, Kjeldsen TR (2014) Review of trend analysis and climate change projections of extreme precipitation and floods in Europe. J Hydrol 519:3634–3650Google Scholar
  32. Nautiyal H, Varun, Kumar A (2010) Reverse running pumps analytical, experimental and computational study: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(7):2059–2067Google Scholar
  33. NASA (2018) Online: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/RisingCost/rising_cost5.php, accessed date: 15 Mar 2018
  34. Nie L, Lindholm O, Lindholm G, Syversen E (2009) Impacts of climate change on urban drainage systems – a case study in Fredrikstad, Norway. Urban Water J 6(4):323–332Google Scholar
  35. Penche C (1998) "Layman's guidebook on how to develop a small hydro site."Google Scholar
  36. Ramos HM, Teyssier C, López-Jiménez PA (2013a) Optimization of retention ponds to improve the drainage system elasticity for water-energy Nexus. Water Resour Manag 27(8):2889–2901Google Scholar
  37. Ramos HM, Teyssier C, Samora I, Schleiss AJ (2013b) Energy recovery in SUDS towards smart water grids: a case study. Energy Policy 62:463–472Google Scholar
  38. Redpath D, Ward MJ (2015) An investigation into the potential of low head hydro power in Northern Ireland for the production of electricity. International Journal of Solar Energy 36(6):517–530Google Scholar
  39. Rojas R, Feyen L, Watkiss P (2013) Climate change and river floods in the European Union: socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 23(6):1737–1751Google Scholar
  40. Sahin O, Stewart RA, Giurco D, Porter MG (2017) Renewable hydropower generation as a co-benefit of balanced urban water portfolio management and flood risk mitigation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:1076–1087Google Scholar
  41. Schaeffer R, Szklo AS, Pereira de Lucena AF, Moreira Cesar Borba BS, Pupo Nogueira LP, Fleming FP, Troccoli A, Harrison M, Boulahya MS (2012) Energy sector vulnerability to climate change: a review. Energy 38(1):1–12Google Scholar
  42. Shadman F, Sadeghipour S, Moghavvemi M, Saidur R (2016) Drought and energy security in key ASEAN countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53:50–58Google Scholar
  43. Shapes (2010). "Energy recovery in existing infrastructures with small hydropower plants."Google Scholar
  44. Signe EBK, Hamandjoda O, Nganhou J (2017) Methodology of feasibility studies of micro-hydro power plants in Cameroon: case of the micro-hydro of KEMKEN. Energy Procedia 119:17–28Google Scholar
  45. Sima A, Lar A (2014) Proposal for hydropower development of the ruscova basin, Romania, in order to mitigate floods as well as water and electricity supplies to the afferent are A. Aerul Si Apa Componente Ale Mediului:453–460Google Scholar
  46. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485–498Google Scholar
  47. Tian Y, Booij MJ, Xu Y-P (2013) Uncertainty in high and low flows due to model structure and parameter errors. Stoch Env Res Risk A 28(2):319–332Google Scholar
  48. Tsihrintzis VA, Hamid R (1998) Runoff quality prediction from small urban catchments using SWMM. Hydrol Process 12(2):311–329Google Scholar
  49. Wazed M, Ahmed S (2009) A feasibility study of micro-hydroelectric power generation at Sapchari waterfall, Khagrachari, Bangladesh. J Appl Sci 9(2):372–376Google Scholar
  50. Xin X, Zhang L, Zhang J, Wu T, Fang Y (2013) Climate change projections over East Asia with BCC_CSM1. 1 climate model under RCP scenarios. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II 91(4):413–429Google Scholar
  51. Xingang Z, Lu L, Xiaomeng L, Jieyu W, Pingkuo L (2012) A critical-analysis on the development of China hydropower. Renew Energy 44:1–6Google Scholar
  52. Yang L, Scheffran J, Qin H, You Q (2015) Climate-related flood risks and urban responses in the Pearl River Delta, China. Reg Environ Chang 15(2):379–391Google Scholar
  53. Yim WW-S (1996) Vulnerability and adaptation of Hong Kong to hazards under climatic change conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 92(1–2):181–190Google Scholar
  54. Ying X, Chong-Hai X (2012) Preliminary assessment of simulations of climate changes over China by CMIP5 multi-models. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters 5(6):489–494Google Scholar
  55. Zarfl C, Lumsdon AE, Berlekamp J, Tydecks L, Tockner K (2015) A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat Sci 77(1):161–170Google Scholar
  56. Zema DA, Nicotra A, Tamburino V, Zimbone SM (2016) A simple method to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of micro hydro power plants in existing irrigation systems. Renew Energy 85:498–506Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower ResearchBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations