Advertisement

From Mountain Ranges to Sweeping Plains, in Droughts and Flooding Rains; River Murray Water Quality over the Last Four Decades

  • Tapas K. Biswas
  • Luke M. Mosley
Article
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to analyse the spatial and temporal patterns and drivers of water quality in a large arid/semi-arid river system (River Murray, Australia) using a long term (1978 − 2015) dataset collected from 24 monitoring sites. The water quality is highly variable, but on average electrical conductivity (EC), pH, turbidity, dissolved and total nutrient, colour and chlorophyll a levels increase with distance downstream from the headwaters to the lower reaches. This is a function of the natural accumulation of dissolved and particulate components and intermittent, mostly diffuse source, pollutant inputs. The Darling tributary inflow increases turbidity, total phosphorus and pH in the main River Murray channel. Based on long-term trend analysis at four representative sites, EC, nutrients and colour showed declining trends on average at most sites except in the headwaters. Increased flow increases concentrations of most quality parameters, although at very high flows decreases in pH, EC, turbidity and oxidized nitrogen were apparent at many sites. The extreme “Millennium” drought (2002 − 2009) period resulted in lowered concentrations of many water quality parameters, indicating retention in the landscape. In the post-drought flooding (2010 − 2012) period a large amount of organic material was mobilised, resulting in much higher peak colour concentrations than when mid-range flooding was more frequent. It is critical that this monitoring program is continued as a Basin-wide water management plan is implemented.

Keywords

Water chemistry Murray-Darling basin Millennium drought Trend analysis Climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Barry Hart for a critical review of an earlier draft of this manuscript that enabled us to greatly improve our analysis. The funding support of the Murray Darling Basin Authority and provision of this valuable dataset is greatly acknowledged, as is the various individuals and organisations who have been involved in the successful delivery of the water quality monitoring program.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

Supplementary material

11269_2018_2168_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1040 kb)

References

  1. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Atech (2000) Aggregated nutrient emissions to the Murray-Darling basin. Report for the National Pollutant Inventory Environment Australia, Atech Group Available at: http://www.npi.gov.au/system/files/resources/3084e6e3-8e3f-c654-e9ec-acf6865ca069/files/mdbreport.pdf Google Scholar
  3. Biswas TK (2014) Old basin same problems: murray darling basin salinity impacts and management interventions. In: Proceedings of Third International Salinity Forum, Riverside, California, pp 44–45. http://salinityforum2014.ucr.edu
  4. Bowling LC, Merrick C, Swann J, Green D, Smith G, Neilan BA (2013) Effects of hydrology and river management on the distribution, abundance and persistence of cyanobacterial blooms in the Murray River, Australia. Harmful Algae 30:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt TP, Howden NJK, Worrall F (2014) On the importance of very long-term water quality records. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 1:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croome R, Wheaton L, Henderson B, Oliver R, Vilizzi L, Paul W, McInerney P (2011) River Murray water quality monitoring program: phytoplankton data trend analysis 1980-2008. Final Report prepared for the Murray-Darling Basin Authority by The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, MDFRC Publication 06/2011, June, 81pp [plus Appendices I to IV, 131pp]Google Scholar
  7. Crosbie RS, Morrow D, Cresswell RG, Leaney FW, Lamontagne S, Lefournour M (2012) New insights into the chemical and isotopic composition of rainfall across Australia. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  8. Donnelly TH, Grace MR, Hart BT (1997) Algal blooms in the Darling-Barwon River, Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut 99:487–496Google Scholar
  9. Douglas GB, Hart BT, Beckett R, Gray CM, Oliver RL (1999) Geochemistry of suspended particulate matter (SPM) in the Murray-Darling river system: a conceptual isotopic/geochemical model for the fractionation of major, trace and rare earth elements. Aquat Geochem 5:167–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick R, Shand P, Mosley L (2017) Acid sulfate soil evolution models and pedogenic pathways during drought and reflooding cycles in irrigated areas and adjacent natural wetlands. Geoderma 308:270–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GHD (1992) An investigation of nutrient pollution in the Murray-Darling river system. Report to the Murray-Darling Basic CommissionGoogle Scholar
  12. Giakoumakis S, Tsakiris G (1997) Meteorological drought effect on sediment yield. Water Resour Manag 11:365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris GP (2001) A nutrient dynamics model for Australian waterways: land use, catchment biogeochemistry and water quality in Australian Rivers, Lakes and Estuaries. Australian State of the Environment Second Technical Paper Series (Inland Waters), Department of Environment and Heritage, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart BT (2015a) The Australian Murray-Darling basin plan: challenges in its implementation (part 1). Internat J Water Resour Develop.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1083847
  15. Hart BT (2015b) The Australian Murray-Darling basin plan: challenges in its implementation (part 2). Internat J Water Resour Develop.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1084494
  16. Hart BT, Davidson D (2017) The Murray-Darling basin plan. In: Hart BT, Doolan J (eds) Decision making in water resources policy, planning and management: the Australian experience, chapter 13. Elsevier Publishing, New York, pp 221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical methods in water resources. Chapter A3. In: Techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States geological survey; Book 4, hydrologic analysis and interpretation, 510 pp. Available at http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/twri/twri4a3/
  18. Henderson B (2006) Updated water quality trend analyses for key sites monitored as part of the MDBC's River Murray Water Quality Monitoring Program, 1978-2005. A report for the Murray-Darling Basin Commission. CMIS Report Number 06/78, June 2006Google Scholar
  19. Henderson B, Liu Y, Baldwin D (2013) Trends in physical and chemical aspects of water quality in the Murray-Darling basin 1978-2012. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Herczeg AL, Dogramaci SS, Leaney FWJ (2001) Origin of dissolved salts in a large, semi-arid groundwater system: Murray Basin, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 52:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins RJ (1990) Off-river storages as sources and sinks for environmental contaminants. River Res Appl 5:401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howden NJK, Burt TP, Worrall F, Whelan MJ, Bieroza M (2010) Nitrate concentrations and fluxes in the river Thames over 140 years (1868–2008): are increases irreversible? Hydrol Process 23:2657–2662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howitt JA, Baldwin DS, Rees GN, Williams JL (2007) Modelling Blackwater: predicting water quality during flooding of lowland river forests. Ecol Model 203:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lutz SR, Mallucci S, Diamantini E, Majone B, Bellin A, Merz R (2016) Hydroclimatic and water quality trends across three Mediterranean river basins. Sci Total Environ 571:1392–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mackay N, Hillman T, Rolls J (1988) Water quality of the river Murray – review of monitoring 1978 to 1986. Water Quality. Report No.1, Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra. 62 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Maheshwari BL, Walker KF, McMahon TA (1995) Effects of regulation on the flow regime of the river Murray, Australia. River Res Appl 10:15–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric test against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MDBA (2010) Guide to the proposed Basin Plan: technical background, Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra, 1188pp. Available at: http://www.mdba.gov.au/kid/guide/
  29. MDBA (2015) Basin Salinity Management 2030 (BSM2030). Murray–Darling Basin Authority. Publication No. 21/15Google Scholar
  30. MDBA (2017) Towards a healthy, working Murray–Darling basin: Basin Plan annual report 2015-16. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority. Publication No. 4/17Google Scholar
  31. Mosley LM (2015) Drought impacts on the water quality of freshwater systems; review and integration. Earth Sci Rev 140:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mosley LM, Fleming N (2010) Pollutant loads returned to the lower Murray River from flood-irrigated agriculture. Water Air Soil Pollut 211:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mosley LM, Zammit B, Leyden E, Heneker TM, Hipsey MR, Skinner D, Aldridge KT (2012) The impact of extreme low flows on the water quality of the lower Murray River and lakes (South Australia). Water Resour Manag 26:3923–3946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mosley LM, Zammit B, Jolley A-M, Barnett L, Fitzpatrick R (2014) Monitoring and assessment of surface water acidification following rewetting of oxidised acid sulfate soils. Environ Monit Assess 186(1):1–18Google Scholar
  35. Murdoch PS, Baron JS, Miller TL (2000) Potential effects of climate changce on surface-water quality in North America. J American Water Resour Assoc 36:347–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olley J, Wallbrink P (2004) Recent trends in turbidity and suspended sediment loads in the Murrumbidgee River, NSW, Australia. In Sediment Transfer through the Fluvial Svstem (Proceedings of a symposium held in Moscow. August 2004). IAI IS Publ. 288Google Scholar
  37. Orr HG, Simpson GL, des Clers S, Watts G, Hughes M, Hannaford J, Dunbar MJ, CLR L, Wilby RL, Battarbee RW, Evans R (2015) Detecting changing river temperatures in England and Wales. Hydrol Process 29:752–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qiao Y, Feng J, Liu X, Wang W, Zhang P, Zhu L (2016) Surface water pH variations and trends in China from 2004 to 2014. Environ Monit Assess 188:443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5454-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts J, Kumar A, Du J, Hepplewhite C, Ellis DJ, Christy AG, Beavis SG (2016) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Australia's largest inland sewage treatment plant, and its contribution to a major Australian river during high and low flow. Sci Total Environ 541:1625–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shafron M, Croome R, Rolls J (1990) Water quality. In: Mackay N, Eastburn D (eds) The Murray. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  41. Small K, Keller R, Kopf RJ, Watts JH (2014) Hypoxia, Blackwater and fish kills: experimental lethal oxygen thresholds in juvenile predatory Lowland River fishes. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094524
  42. Turner RE, Rabalais NN (1991) Changes in Mississippi River water quality this century. BioScience 41:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Dijk AIJM, Beck HE, Crosbie RS, de Jeu RAM, Liu YY, Podger GM, Timbal B, Viney NR (2013) The millennium drought in Southeast Australia (2001–2009): natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resour Res 49.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20123
  44. van Vliet MTH, Ludwig F, Zwolsman JJG, Weedon GP, Kabat P (2011) Global river temperatures and sensitivity to atmospheric warming and changes in river flow. Water Resour Res 47:W02544Google Scholar
  45. Ward NJ, Bush RT, Sullivan LA, Fyfe DM, Coughran J, Tulau M, Allman B, Morand D, Wong VNL (2010) Assessment of acid sulfate soil materials in the Edward and Wakool Rivers region of the Murray-Darling Basin. Southern Cross GeoScience Technical Report No. 410, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, 162 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Whitworth KL, Baldwin DS, Kerr JL (2012) Drought, floods and water quality: drivers of a severe hypoxic Blackwater event in a major river system (the southern Murray–Darling basin, Australia). J Hydrol 450–451:190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitworth KL, Kerr JL, Mosley LM, Conallin J, Hardwick L, Baldwin DS (2013) Options for managing hypoxic Blackwater in river systems: case studies and framework. Environ Manag 114:139–147Google Scholar
  48. Zhang A, Oldham C (2001) The use of an ultrafiltration technique for measurement of orthophosphate in shallow wetlands. Sci Total Environ 266:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Murray-Darling Basin AuthorityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Fenner School of Environment & SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AdelaideGlen OsmondAustralia

Personalised recommendations