Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 303–317 | Cite as

Role of Transformative Capacity in River Basin Management Transformations

  • Aleksi RäsänenEmail author
  • Paula Schönach
  • Alexandra Jurgilevich
  • Milja Heikkinen
  • Sirkku Juhola
Article

Abstract

To tackle problems related to water quantity and quality, transformations in water management systems have become of increasing interest. Transformative capacity can be defined as the ability first to adapt to changes, and if needed, to carry out fundamental changes in a specific system. Using a framework of ten components of transformative capacity and an analysis of earlier historical research, policy documents and data gathered in a stakeholder scenario workshop, we examine the relationship between past and future transformations and transformative capacity in river basin management in the River Vantaa basin, located in southern Finland. In the past, River Vantaa was heavily polluted by municipal wastewater. The water quality has gradually improved but is still not considered good. The most successful changes have been concentrated on point source pollution, such as municipal wastewater, and they have mostly been driven by public administration and municipal coordination. In the future, more effort should be put on diffuse pollution, especially agricultural loading, and this requires changes in societal values and new forms of governance. We show how the past transformations have partly been driven by transformative capacity, but some transformations have enabled changes in the components of transformative capacity, indicating the interconnectedness of the different components. Furthermore, the interplay between transformations and transformative capacity occurs across spatial and temporal scales. We discuss how transformations take time, how transformative capacity evolves over longer time-spans, and how capacity and trajectories in local and wider scales are in a continuous interaction.

Keywords

River basin management Transformation Transformative capacity Water governance Water management Water quality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Helsinki University Centre for Environment (HENVI) [project number 77255106], the Academy of Finland [grant 286676] and Tiina and Antti Herlin Foundation [Grant No. 20160025]. We thank Anja Nygren, Mira Käkönen, Adrián Monge Monge and Markku Kanninen for helping in the planning and carrying out the stakeholder scenario workshop.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Abel N, Wise RM, Colloff MJ, Walker BH, Butler JRA, Ryan P, Norman C, Langston A, Anderies JM, Gorddard R, Dunlop M, O’Connell D (2016) Building resilient pathways to transformation when “no one is in charge”: insights from Australia's Murray-Darling Basin. Ecol Soc 21(2):23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg BL (2009) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 7th edn. Pearson Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaffin BC, Garmestani AC, Gunderson LH, Benson MH, Angeler DG, Arnold CA, Cosens B, Craig RK, Ruhl JB, Allen CR (2016) Transformative environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:399–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chin A (2006) Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 79(3):460–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman WD, Chiasson C (2002) State power, transformative capacity and adapting to globalization: an analysis of French agricultural policy, 1960-2000. J Eur Public Policy 9(2):168–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cresswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniell KA, Barreteau O (2014) Water governance across competing scales: coupling land and water management. J Hydrol 519:2367–2380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Downs P, Gregory K, Brookes A (1991) How integrated is river basin management? Environ Manag 15(3):299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson B, Brown R, Deletic A (2013) A diagnostic procedure for transformative change based on transitions, resilience, and institutional thinking. Ecol Soc 18(4):57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockstrom J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillon S, Booth EG, Rissman AR (2016) Shifting drivers and static baselines in environmental governance: challenges for improving and proving water quality outcomes. Reg Environ Chang 16(3):759–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godden L, Ison RL, Wallis PJ (2011) Water governance in a climate change world: appraising systemic and adaptive effectiveness. Water Resour Manag 25(15):3971–3976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haikonen A, Paasivirta L, Helminen J, Tolvanen O (2013) Vantaanjoen yhteistarkkailu - Kalasto ja pohjaeläimet vuonna 2012. Kala- ja vesitutkimus Oy, Kala- ja vesitutkimuksia nro 105, KlaukkalaGoogle Scholar
  14. Heathcote IW (2009) Integrated watershed management: principles and practice, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Heikkinen M, Schönach P, Massa I (2016) Politicization of wastewater overflows: the case of the Vantaa River, Finland. Water Policy 18(6):1454–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helsingin Kaupunki (1988) Vantaanjoki - pääkaupungin kehdosta virkistyksen valtasuoneksi: toimenpideohjelma (1987–88) 1989–1993. Helsingin kaupungin johtajistotoimikunta, Working Group Report, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  17. Herranen T (2001) Vettä ja elämää: Helsingin vesihuollon historia 1876–2001. Helsingin Vesi, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  18. Hietala J (2017) Tuusulanjärven kunnostus vuosina 1999–2013: Hoitotoimia ja seurantaa. Uudenmaan elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ympäristökeskus, Report 56/2017, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  19. Jager NW, Challies E, Kochskämper E et al (2016) Transforming European water governance? Participation and river basin management under the EU water framework directive in 13 member states. Water 8(4):156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joas M (2001) Reflexive modernisation of the environmental administration in Finland: essays of institutional and policy change within the Finnish national and local environmental administration. Åbo Akademi University Press, TurkuGoogle Scholar
  21. Juuti P (2015) Valkea kaupunki, mustat vedet: Helsingin vedet 1800-luvun lopusta 2000-luvulle. Tampere University Press, TampereGoogle Scholar
  22. Karonen M, Mäntykoski A, Lankiniemi V, Nylander E, Lehto K, Jalava L (2015) Uudenmaan vesienhoidon toimenpideohjelma vuosille 2016–2021. Uudenmaan elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ympäristökeskus, Raportteja 134 / 2015, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  23. Katko T (1997) Water!: evolution of water supply and sanitation in Finland from the mid-1800s to 2000. Helsinki, Finnish Water and Wastewater Works AssociationGoogle Scholar
  24. Méthot J, Huang X, Grover H (2015) Demographics and societal values as drivers of change in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River basin. J Great Lakes Res 41:30–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Molle F (2009) River-basin planning and management: The social life of a concept. Geoforum 40(3):484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newson M (1997) Land, water and development: sustainable management of river basin systems. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Norman E, Bakker K (2009) Transgressing Scales: Water Governance Across the Canada–U.S. Borderland. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 99(1):99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien K (2012) Global environmental change II From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Prog Hum Geogr 36(5):667–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pahl-Wostl C (2015) Water Governance in the Face of Global Change: From Understanding to Transformation. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pahl-Wostl C (2017) An evolutionary perspective on water governance: from understanding to transformation. Water Resour Manag 31(10):2917–2932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park SE, Marshall NA, Jakku E, Dowd AM, Howden SM, Mendham E, Fleming A (2012) Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Glob Environ Chang 22(1):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Priess JA, Hauck J (2014) Integrative scenario development. Ecol Soc 19(1):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahikainen E (2001) Kuohuva vuosisata: Vantaanjoki ja helsingin vedenotto. In: Laakkonen S, Laurila S, Kansanen P, Schulman H (eds) Näkökulmia helsingin ympäristöhistoriaan: Kaupungin ja ympäristön muutos 1800- ja 1900-luvuilla. Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus. Helsinki, Finland, pp 206–225Google Scholar
  34. Räsänen A, Juhola S, Monge Monge A, Käkönen M, Kanninen M, Nygren A (2017) Identifying mismatches between institutional perceptions of water-related risk drivers and water management strategies in three river basin areas. J Hydrol 550:704–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Räsänen A, Nygren A, Monge Monge A, Käkönen M, Kanninen M, Juhola S (2018) From divide to nexus: Interconnected land use and water management changes shaping risks and vulnerabilities. Appl Geogr 90C:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saura A, Könönen K, Yrjölä R, Rinne J (2005) Vantaanjoen yhteistarkkailu kalasto vuonna 2004 ja pohjaeläimet vuosina 2002–2004. Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Kala- ja riistaraportteja nro 368, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  37. Schönach P (2007) Vantaanjoen suojeluyhteistyö toisen maailmansodan jälkeen. Historiallinen aikakauskirja 105(1):22–33Google Scholar
  38. Schönach P (2015) Expanding Sanitary Infrastructure and the Shaping of River History: River Vantaa (Finland), 1876-1982. Environ Hist 21(2):201–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vahtera H, Muukkonen P, Männynsalo J, Lahti K (2005) Vantaanjoen yhteistarkkailu. Vedenlaatu vuosina 2000–2004. Vantaanjoen ja Helsingin seudun vesienhoitoyhdistys, Report 56/2005, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  40. Vahtera H, Männynsalo J (2018) Vantaanjoen yhteistarkkailu - Vedenlaatu 2017. Vantaanjoen ja Helsingin seudun vesienhoitoyhdistys, Report 11/2018, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  41. Vantaanjoki-toimikunta (1985) Vantaanjoki-toimikunnan mietintö. Ympäristöministeriö, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  42. Vesistönsuojelukomitea (1958) Vesistönsuojelukomitean mietintö, 13. Kulkulaitosten ja yleisten töiden ministeriö, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  43. VHVSY (2017) http://www.vhvsy.fi/sivut/virkistyskaytto. Accessed 1 Feb 2017
  44. Wallis PJ, Ison RL (2011) Appreciating institutional complexity in water governance dynamics: a case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resour Manag 25(15):4081–4097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winiwarter V, Knoll M (2007) Umweltgeschichte: Eine Einführung. Böhlau Verlag, KölnGoogle Scholar
  46. Wardropper CB, Chang C, Rissman AR (2015) Fragmented water quality governance: constraints to spatial targeting for nutrient reduction in a Midwestern USA watershed. Landsc Urban Plan 137:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolfram M (2016) Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities 51:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wright SA, Jacobsen BH (2011) Participation in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Denmark: The prospects for active involvement. Water Policy 13(2):232–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of GeographyNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations