Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Games to Create Awareness and Design Policies for Transboundary Cooperation in River Basins: Lessons from the Shariva Game of the Mekong River Commission

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International river basins cover a vast majority of the land surface, international cooperation is therefore important for the proper management, and to assure equitable and effective use in the basins. Key elements to improve international cooperation are common understanding of the issues in the basin, understanding upstream-downstream impacts and sharing a common vision for the future. This article focuses on the role of games in international basin cooperation to create awareness and to support policy development. The paper analysed the effects of the game in creating awareness and upgrading knowledge amongst water and related professionals and in designing procedures for cooperation in transboundary river basins. This was analysed during the implementation of the game with 28 participants from the four Lower Mekong countries. The impact on creating awareness and upgrading knowledge was evaluated through the use of questionnaires and pre- and post evaluation questions and for the design of policies, a SWOT analysis was used to evaluate the usefulness of the policies and frameworks as well as to identify possible improvements to the framework. The game implementation proved to be an appropriate tool to provide a practical way for stakeholders to become acquainted with the administrative and technical tools available in the Lower Mekong Basin. Pre- and post test shows that participants gained substantial knowledge on transboundary cooperation and use of tools. The game was part of a longer training programme addressing all the issues, however, the participants gained additional knowledge and insight by playing the game, well above what they had learned during the earlier training workshops. Playing the game proved an important aspect in training and education of such complex systems. The study also shows the role games can play in policy analysis, in particular the way the game provided insight in the design of the policy and the development of procedures, and their function to review and update policies and procedures. A number of recommendations have been made to strengthen the role in both training and education as well as in design of procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree).

References

  • Baran E, Starr P, Kura Y (2007) Influence of built structures on Tonle Sap fisheries. Cambodia National Mekong Committee and the WorldFish Center, Phnom Penh, 44 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearden BL (2010) The legal regime of the Mekong River: a look back and some proposals for the way ahead. Water Policy 12:798–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bots P, van Daalen C (2007) Functional design of games to support natural resources management policy development. Simul Gaming 38:512–532. doi:10.1504/IJTPM.2004.004819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douven W, Mul ML, Fernández Álvarez B, Son LH, Bakker N, Radosevich G, van der Zaag P (2012) Enhancing capacities of riparian professionals to address and resolve transboundary issues in international river basins: experiences from the Lower Mekong River Basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3183–3197, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3183/2012/hess-16-3183-2012.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CA, Sneddon C (2007) Transboundary river basin agreements in the Mekong and Zambezi basins: enhancing environmental security or securitizing the environment? Int Environ Agreements 7:237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY (2012) Computer-supported games and role plays in teaching water management. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:2985–2994, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/2985/2012/hess-16-2985-2012.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone I (1999) Role-playing planning public inquiries. J Geogr High Educ 23(1):63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer IS (2009) The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming. Simul Gaming 40(6):825–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer IS, van Daalen C, Bots P (2004) Perspectives on policy analysis: a framework for understanding and design. Int J Technol Policy Des 4:169–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MRC (1995) Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River Basin. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 68 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC (2010) State of the basin report 2010. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 232 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC (2011) Prior consultation project review report, proposed xayaburi dam project—Mekong River. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 99 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC-BDP (2011) IWRM-based basin development strategy 2011–2015. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 42 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC-FMMP (2007) Working paper on the legal aspects of the mandate of the 1995 Mekong agreement for enhancing cooperation in addressing transboundary flood and related issues. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 75 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC-FMMP (2008a) Implementation plan, capacity building programme of the Mekong river commission flood management and mitigation programme- component 3 ‘anticipating and resolving flood issues, differences and disputes in the lower Mekong Basin’, Version 18 December 2008. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 47 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC-FMMP (2008b) Transboundary flood issue identification, January 2008. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 42 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC-FMMP (2009). An explanatory note—Supporting document to the FMMP working paper: The legal aspects of the mandate of the 1995 Mekong agreement for enhancing cooperation in addressing transboundary flood and related issues (LA-MA95). Component 3: Enhancing cooperation in addressing transboundary flood issues. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, Lao PDR, 62 pages

  • Piman T, Cochrane TA, Arias ME, Green A, Dat ND (2012) Assessment of flow changes from hydropower development and operations in Sekong, Sesan and Srepok Rivers of the Mekong Basin. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139(6):723–732. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen AF, Poeu O, Viravong S, Suntornratnana U, Tung NT (2002) Fish migrations of the lower Mekong basin: Implications for development, planning and environmental management, vol 8, MRC technical paper. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh, 62 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen TA, Koponen J, Lauri H, Kummu M (2012) Downstream hydrological impacts of hydropower development in the upper Mekong basin. Water Resour Manag 26:3495–3513. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0087-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P (1993) The value of cooperation in resolving international river basin disputes. Nat Res Forum 17(2):117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusca M, Heun J, Schwartz K (2012) Water management simulation games and the construction of knowledge. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:2749–2757, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/2749/2012/hess-16-2749-2012.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salen K, Zimmerman E (2004) Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, 688 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza M, Tatemoto L (2009) Shared waters: from global principles to regional agreements. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 124:375–386. doi:10.2495/RM090341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2003) Water security and peace: A synthesis of studies prepared under the PCCP–water for peace process. Compiled by Cosgrove, W.J, vol 29. PCCP, Paris, 108 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-WWAP (2006) World water development report 2: Water, a shared responsibility. UNESCO, Paris, 584 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AT, Natharius JA, Danielson JJ, Ward BS, Pender JK (1999) International river basins of the world. Int J Water Resour Dev 15(4):387–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented is based on the Capacity Building Programme of the Mekong River Commission, Flood Management and Mitigation Programme (MRC-FMMP), Component #3 ‘Enhancing cooperation in addressing transboundary flood issues’. The Programme was implemented by UNESCO-IHE, UNESCO-PCCP, RAD International and Deltares together with the following national and regional training and education institutes: Royal University of Phnom Penh, National University of Laos, Mekong Institute (Thailand), King Prajadhipok’s Institute (Thailand), and the Hanoi Water Resources University. The Programme was funded by the MRC-FMMP and received a small contribution from the Netherlands Ministry of Development Cooperation (DGIS) through the UNESCO-IHE Programmatic Cooperation Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Douven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Douven, W., Mul, M.L., Son, L. et al. Games to Create Awareness and Design Policies for Transboundary Cooperation in River Basins: Lessons from the Shariva Game of the Mekong River Commission. Water Resour Manage 28, 1431–1447 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0562-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0562-x

Keywords

Navigation