Advertisement

The Geography and Disparities of Community Philanthropy: A Community Assessment Model of Needs, Resources, and Ecological Environment

  • Viviana Chiu-Sik WuEmail author
Research Papers

Abstract

Community foundations exemplify a growing form of place-based philanthropic efforts for addressing public problems. However, why do such efforts occur in some places, but not in others? Using an original population dataset of community foundations that combines community characteristics with service area data across 3130 US counties, the empirical analyses of hurdle negative binomial models reveal distinct patterns in explaining their locational distribution and philanthropic activities. Community foundations tend to emerge or flourish in urban communities which are White-dominant, ethnically homogeneous, and less religious but have more social and human capital. Crossing the zero hurdle, their philanthropic activities tend to bloom in ethnically diverse and unequal communities but plummet in highly educated communities with more high-income earners, whereas rural and vulnerable communities with high proportions of residents who are young, old, unemployed, and disabled exemplify potential service gaps of community foundations associated with their rarity and/or fewer philanthropic activities. This study presents a community assessment model and empirical evidence of what might promote and inhibit the occurrence of community philanthropic efforts.

Keywords

Place disparity Community foundations Service area Community assessment Nonprofit density 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the two anonymous reviewers and scholars working in the field of community philanthropy, whom I have benefited substantially from their insightful work and comments. Much appreciation also goes to Dr. Ioana Marinescu, Dr. Chao Guo and Dr. Weiai (Wayne) Xu, and the panel participants at the 2018 ARNOVA-Asia conference and 2018 Academy of Management Conference, for providing valuable feedback to this research. Last but not least, I would like to thank important collaborators of this research project, including Dr. Laurie Paarlberg, Colton Strawser, Jin Ai, and Yue Ming, for partaking in a collaborative endeavor to collect service area data of community foundations.

Funding

No funding has been received for conducting this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11266_2019_180_MOESM1_ESM.docx (232 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 232 kb)

Reference

  1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review,27(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adloff, F. (2015). Foundations and the charisma of giving: A historical sociology of philanthropy in Germany and the United States. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(1), 2002–2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics,115(3), 847–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics,85(2), 207–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anheier, H. K., & Hammack, D. C. (2010). American foundations, roles and contributions. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association,35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
  7. Arsneault, S. (2006). Implementing welfare reform in rural and urban communities: Why place matters. American Review of Public Administration,36(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,32(4), 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving part one: religion, education, age and socialisation. Voluntary Sector Review,2(3), 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1991). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,62(4), 519–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, nonprofit and government sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63(3), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bielefeld, W., Murdoch, J. C., & Waddell, P. (1997). The influence of demographics and distance on nonprofit location. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,26(2), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics,12(4–5), 311–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport: Greenwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review,8(4), 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, E., & Ferris, J. M. (2007). Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,36(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bushouse, B. K. (2017). Leveraging nonprofit and voluntary action research to inform public policy. Policy Studies Journal,45(1), 50–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data (1st ed.). Econometric Society Monograph No.30. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Carman, J. G. (2001). Community foundations: A growing resource for community development. Nonprofit Management and Leadership,12(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheng, Y. (2019). Exploring the role of nonprofits in public service provision: moving from coproduction to cogovernance. Public Administration Review,79(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review,66(s1), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corbin, J. J. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,28(3), 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2003). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics,1(1), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., Su, M., & Chow, J. (1995). Community level factors and child maltreatment rates. Child Development,66(5), 1262–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cui, L., & Walsh, R. (2015). Foreclosure, vacancy and crime. Journal of Urban Economics,87, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. da Costa, M. M. (2016). What influences the location of nonprofit organizations? A spatial analysis in Brazil. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(3), 1064–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Daly, S. (2008). Institutional innovation in philanthropy: Community foundations in the UK. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,19(3), 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dalrymple, M. L., Hudson, I. L., & Ford, R. P. K. (2003). Finite mixture, zero—inflated poisson and hurdle models with application to SIDS. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41(3–4), 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diaz, W. A., & Shaw, A. (2002). Community foundations and progressive grantmaking public charities. In L. C. Burbridge, W. A. Diaz, T. Odendahl, & A. Shaw (Eds.), The meaning and impact of board and staff diversity in the philanthropic field: Findings from a national study. San Francisco: Joint Affinity Groups.Google Scholar
  31. Easterling, D. (2011). Promoting community leadership among community foundations: The role of the social capital benchmark survey. The Foundation Review,3(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eikenberry, A. M. (2006). Giving circles: Growing grassroots philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,35(3), 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eikenberry, A. M. (2007). Philanthropy, voluntary association, and governance beyond the state giving circles and challenges for democracy. Administration and Society,39(7), 857–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Giving circles: Philanthropy, voluntary association, and democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gathiram, N. (2006). Poverty, development and disability. Social Work,42(3–4), 251–256.Google Scholar
  36. Garrow, E. E. (2012). Does race matter in government funding of nonprofit human service organizations? The interaction of neighborhood poverty and race. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Global Fund for Community Foundation. (2014). Community Foundation Atlas. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from http://communityfoundationatlas.org/.
  38. Graddy, E. A., & Morgan, D. L. (2006). Community foundations, organizational strategy, and public policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,35(4), 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Graddy, E., & Wang, L. (2009). Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,38(3), 392–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Practice Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Grønbjerg, K. (2006). Foundation legitimacy at the community level in the United States. The legitimacy of philanthropic foundations: United States and European perspectives (pp. 150–174).Google Scholar
  42. Grønbjerg, K. A., & Paarlberg, L. (2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,30(4), 684–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guo, C., & Brown, W. A. (2006). Community foundation performance: Bridging community resources and needs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,35(2), 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Guo, C., & Musso, J. A. (2007). Representation in nonprofit and voluntary organizations: A conceptual framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hall, D. H. (1989). The Community Foundation in America, 1914–1987. In R. Magat (Ed.), Philanthropic giving: Studies in varieties and goals (pp. 180–199). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hammack, D. C. (1989). Community foundations: The delicate question of purpose. In R. Magat (Ed.), An agile servant: Community leadership by community foundations (pp. 23–50). New York: Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  47. Hammack, D. C. (Ed.). (1998). Making the nonprofit sector in the United States: A reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hammack, D. C. (2018). Appendix B: Community funds and the distribution of smaller foundations. In D. C. Hammack & S. R. Smith (Eds.), American philanthropic foundations: Regional difference and change (pp. 343–355). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hammack, D. C., & Anheier, H. K. (2013). A versatile American institution: The changing ideals and realities of philanthropic foundations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hammack, D. C., & Smith, S. R. (2018a). American philanthropic foundations: Regional difference and change. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hammack, D. C., & Smith, S. R. (2018b). Foundations in the United States: Dimensions for international comparison. American Behavioral Scientist,62(12), 1603–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Joassart-Marcelli, P., & Wolch, J. R. (2003). The intrametropolitan geography of poverty and the nonprofit sector in Southern California. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,32(1), 70–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jones, R. W., & Pridemore, W. A. (2016). A longitudinal study of the impact of home vacancy on robbery and burglary rates during the US housing crisis, 2005–2009. Crime and Delinquency,62(9), 1159–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kenney, G. M., Long, S. K., & Luque, A. (2010). Health reform in Massachusetts cut the uninsurance rate among children in half. Health Affairs (Project Hope),29(6), 1242–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim, M. (2015). Socioeconomic diversity, political engagement, and the density of nonprofit organizations in U.S. counties. American Review of Public Administration,45(4), 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Layton, M. D. (2016). Philanthropy at the community level: Supporting community empowerment. In Jung T, Susan D. Phillips, & Jenny Harrow (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy (pp. 139–150).Google Scholar
  57. Lecy, J. D., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2013). Nonprofit sector growth and density: Testing theories of government support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,23(1), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu, G. (2017). Government Decentralization and the Size of the Nonprofit Sector: Revisiting the Government Failure Theory. American Review of Public Administration, 47(6), 619–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  60. Lowe, J. S. (2004). Community foundations: What do they offer community development? Journal of Urban Affairs,26(2), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lu, J. (2017). Does population heterogeneity really matter to nonprofit sector size? Revisiting Weisbrod’s demand heterogeneity hypothesis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9915-4
  62. Mallach, A., & Brachman, L. (2013). Regenerating America’s legacy cities. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  63. McDougle, L. M. (2015). The accuracy of the core files for studying nonprofit location: How many nonprofits are there? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,44(3), 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mcdowell, A. (2003). From the help desk: Hurdle models. The Stata Journal,3(2), 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Millesen, J. L., & Martin, E. C. (2014). Community foundation strategy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,43(5), 832–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ostrander, S. A. (2007). The growth of donor control: Revisiting the social relations of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,36(2), 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ostrom, V. (1994). The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
  68. Ostrower, F. (1997). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ostrower, F. (2007). The relativity of foundation effectiveness: The case of community foundations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,36(3), 521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paarlberg, L. E., An, S. H., Nesbit, R., Christensen, R. K., & Bullock, J. (2018). A field too crowded? How measures of market structure shape nonprofit fiscal health. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,47(3), 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peck, L. R. (2008). Do antipoverty nonprofits locate where people need them? Evidence from a spatial analysis of Phoenix. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,37(1), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Phillips, S., Bird, I., Carlton, L., & Rose, L. (2016). Knowledge as leadership, belonging as community: How Canadian community foundations are using vital signs for social change. The Foundation Review,8, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community. The American Prospect,4(13), 35–42.Google Scholar
  74. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy,6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies,30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Putnam, R. D. (2016). Our Kids: The American dream in crisis. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  77. Ragey, N., Masaoka, J., & Peters, J. B. (2005). Convergence and competition: United Ways and community foundations: A national inquiry. San Francisco, CA: CompassPoint.Google Scholar
  78. Rossi, P. H., & Weber, E. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., & Freshwater, D. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. The Journal of Socio-economics,35(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Saffari, S. E., Adnan, R., & Greene, W. (2012). Hurdle negative binomial regression model with right censored count data. Statistics and Operations Research Transactions SORT,36(2), 181–194.Google Scholar
  81. Sargeant, A., & Woodliffe, L. (2007). Building donor loyalty: The antecedents and role of commitment in the context of charity giving. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing,18(2), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Saxton, G. D., & Benson, M. A. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly,86(1), 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schuller, T. (2007). Reflections on the use of social capital. Review of Social Economy,65(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sidel, M. (2010). Recent developments in community foundation law: The quest for endowment building. Chicago-Kent Law Review,85(2), 657.Google Scholar
  85. Silver, I. (2007). Disentangling class from philanthropy: The double-edged sword of alternative giving. Critical Sociology, 33(3), 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Suárez, D. F., & Esparza, N. (2017). Institutional change and management of public–nonprofit partnerships. American Review of Public Administration,47(6), 648–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. United States Department of Justice. (2016). Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform crime reporting program data: County-level detailed arrest and offense data, 2014. ICPSR36399-v2. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  88. Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Wiepking, P., & Maas, I. (2009). Resources that make you generous: Effects of social and human resources on charitable giving. Social Force, 87(4), 1973–1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolch, J. R., & Geiger, R. K. (1983). The distribution of urban voluntary resources: An exploratory analysis. Environment and Planning A,15(8), 1067–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wolpert, J. (1993). Decentralization and equity in public and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,22(4), 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wolpert, J. (1995). Giving and region: Generous and stingy communities. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising,1995(7), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wolpert, J. (1988). The geography of generosity: Metropolitan disparities in donations and support for amenities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,78(4), 665–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  95. Yan, J., Guo, C., & Paarlberg, L. E. (2014). Are nonprofit antipoverty organizations located where they are needed? A spatial analysis of the greater Hartford region. The American Statistician,68(4), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Policy and PracticeUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations