The Geography and Disparities of Community Philanthropy: A Community Assessment Model of Needs, Resources, and Ecological Environment
Community foundations exemplify a growing form of place-based philanthropic efforts for addressing public problems. However, why do such efforts occur in some places, but not in others? Using an original population dataset of community foundations that combines community characteristics with service area data across 3130 US counties, the empirical analyses of hurdle negative binomial models reveal distinct patterns in explaining their locational distribution and philanthropic activities. Community foundations tend to emerge or flourish in urban communities which are White-dominant, ethnically homogeneous, and less religious but have more social and human capital. Crossing the zero hurdle, their philanthropic activities tend to bloom in ethnically diverse and unequal communities but plummet in highly educated communities with more high-income earners, whereas rural and vulnerable communities with high proportions of residents who are young, old, unemployed, and disabled exemplify potential service gaps of community foundations associated with their rarity and/or fewer philanthropic activities. This study presents a community assessment model and empirical evidence of what might promote and inhibit the occurrence of community philanthropic efforts.
KeywordsPlace disparity Community foundations Service area Community assessment Nonprofit density
I am grateful to the two anonymous reviewers and scholars working in the field of community philanthropy, whom I have benefited substantially from their insightful work and comments. Much appreciation also goes to Dr. Ioana Marinescu, Dr. Chao Guo and Dr. Weiai (Wayne) Xu, and the panel participants at the 2018 ARNOVA-Asia conference and 2018 Academy of Management Conference, for providing valuable feedback to this research. Last but not least, I would like to thank important collaborators of this research project, including Dr. Laurie Paarlberg, Colton Strawser, Jin Ai, and Yue Ming, for partaking in a collaborative endeavor to collect service area data of community foundations.
No funding has been received for conducting this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anheier, H. K., & Hammack, D. C. (2010). American foundations, roles and contributions. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association,35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport: Greenwood Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data (1st ed.). Econometric Society Monograph No.30. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Diaz, W. A., & Shaw, A. (2002). Community foundations and progressive grantmaking public charities. In L. C. Burbridge, W. A. Diaz, T. Odendahl, & A. Shaw (Eds.), The meaning and impact of board and staff diversity in the philanthropic field: Findings from a national study. San Francisco: Joint Affinity Groups.Google Scholar
- Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Giving circles: Philanthropy, voluntary association, and democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Gathiram, N. (2006). Poverty, development and disability. Social Work,42(3–4), 251–256.Google Scholar
- Global Fund for Community Foundation. (2014). Community Foundation Atlas. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from http://communityfoundationatlas.org/.
- Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Practice Hall.Google Scholar
- Grønbjerg, K. (2006). Foundation legitimacy at the community level in the United States. The legitimacy of philanthropic foundations: United States and European perspectives (pp. 150–174).Google Scholar
- Hall, D. H. (1989). The Community Foundation in America, 1914–1987. In R. Magat (Ed.), Philanthropic giving: Studies in varieties and goals (pp. 180–199). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hammack, D. C. (1989). Community foundations: The delicate question of purpose. In R. Magat (Ed.), An agile servant: Community leadership by community foundations (pp. 23–50). New York: Foundation Center.Google Scholar
- Hammack, D. C. (Ed.). (1998). Making the nonprofit sector in the United States: A reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Hammack, D. C. (2018). Appendix B: Community funds and the distribution of smaller foundations. In D. C. Hammack & S. R. Smith (Eds.), American philanthropic foundations: Regional difference and change (pp. 343–355). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Hammack, D. C., & Anheier, H. K. (2013). A versatile American institution: The changing ideals and realities of philanthropic foundations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Layton, M. D. (2016). Philanthropy at the community level: Supporting community empowerment. In Jung T, Susan D. Phillips, & Jenny Harrow (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy (pp. 139–150).Google Scholar
- Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Lu, J. (2017). Does population heterogeneity really matter to nonprofit sector size? Revisiting Weisbrod’s demand heterogeneity hypothesis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9915-4
- Mallach, A., & Brachman, L. (2013). Regenerating America’s legacy cities. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, V. (1994). The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community. The American Prospect,4(13), 35–42.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D. (2016). Our Kids: The American dream in crisis. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Ragey, N., Masaoka, J., & Peters, J. B. (2005). Convergence and competition: United Ways and community foundations: A national inquiry. San Francisco, CA: CompassPoint.Google Scholar
- Saffari, S. E., Adnan, R., & Greene, W. (2012). Hurdle negative binomial regression model with right censored count data. Statistics and Operations Research Transactions SORT,36(2), 181–194.Google Scholar
- Sidel, M. (2010). Recent developments in community foundation law: The quest for endowment building. Chicago-Kent Law Review,85(2), 657.Google Scholar
- United States Department of Justice. (2016). Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform crime reporting program data: County-level detailed arrest and offense data, 2014. ICPSR36399-v2. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar