Advertisement

The Role of Development Oriented Non-Governmental Organizations in Creating Shared Value in the Educational Sector of Ghana: The Mediating Role of Basic Needs

  • Mohammed Abubakari SadickEmail author
  • Wenyuan Li
  • Abdul-Aziz Ibn Musah
  • Alhassan Abdul-Rasheed Alolo Akeji
  • Hira Salah Ud din Khan
Original Paper
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

This paper employed a structural equation modeling technique to investigate how Development Oriented Non-Governmental Organizations (DONGOs) could complement government efforts through the concept of shared value creation in the educational sector of Ghana. To address this objective, we analyzed whether DONGOs could create shared value by pursuing both social and economic objectives and also how the growing basic needs of education could influence these relationships. The study concluded that basic needs fully mediate social value to shared value and partially mediate economic value to shared value. Moreover, the study revealed that economic value to shared value creation is statistically significant and also demonstrated a positive and significant relationship between social value and shared value. The results further indicate that basic needs have a positive and significant relationship with shared value.

Keywords

Creation of shared value (CSV) Social value Economic value Basic needs Development Oriented Non-Governmental Organizations (DONGOs) 

Notes

Funding

This work is sponsored by Chinese National Fund “Research on the Formation and Governance Mechanisms of Enterprise Open Innovation Ecosystem” (15BGL032).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study also complied with the guidelines by Development Oriented Non-Governmental Organizations (DONGOs) and the statutory provisions in Ghana for the conduct of research.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Respondents were informed about the objectives of the research and were made to understand that the study is scientific and confidential in nature. The respondents were also made to understand that the study is given a global and anonymous treatment to any data collected. Questionnaire was then administered to respondents who in this case are members of DONGOs to solicit information about the operations of their entities regarding economic and social issues.

References

  1. Aakhus, M., & Bzdak, M. (2012). Revisiting the role of “shared value” in the business-society relationship. Business and Professional Ethics Journal,31(2), 231–246.  https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201231211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldashev, G., & Navarra, C. (2018). Development Ngos: Basic facts. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 89(1), 125–155.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aheto-Tsegah, C. (2011). Education in Ghana—Status and challenges. Commonwealth Education Partnerships, 27–30. http://www.cedol.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Charles-Aheto-Tsegah-article.pdf.
  4. Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,4(2), 142–175.Google Scholar
  5. Ametepee, L. K., & Anastasiou, D. (2015). Special and inclusive education in Ghana: Status and progress, challenges and implications. International Journal of Educational Development,41, 143–152.Google Scholar
  6. Anastasiou, D., & Keller, C. (2011). International differences in provision for exceptional learners. In J. M. Kauffman & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 770–784). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Anastasiou, D., & Keller, C. E. (2014). Cross-national differences in special education coverage: An empirical analysis. Exceptional Children, 80(3), 353–367.Google Scholar
  8. Asiama, J., Akosah, N., & Owusu-Afriyie, E. (2014). An assessment of fiscal sustainability in Ghana. Bank of Ghana Working Paper, WP/BOG/9, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  9. Atibil, C. (2012). Democratic governance and actors’ Conceptualization of ‘“Civil Society”’ in Africa: State-Civil Society Relations in Ghana from 1982 to 2000 (pp. 43–62).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9242-0.Google Scholar
  10. Austin, J. E., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?”. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,30, 1–22.Google Scholar
  11. Baraka, D. (2010). Corporations and the third sector: Responsible marriages at last? Journal of Global Responsibility,1(1), 34–54.Google Scholar
  12. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (pls) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technological Studies, 2(2), 285–309.Google Scholar
  13. Barling, J., & Fincham, F. (1979). Maslow’s need hierarchy and dimensions of perceived locus of control. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,134(2), 313–314.Google Scholar
  14. Barnes, S. J., & Pressey, A. D. (2011). Who needs cyberspace? Examining drivers of needs in Second Life. Internet Research,21(3), 236–254.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111139291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Beschorner. (2014). Creating Shared Value: The one-trick pony approach. Business Ethics Journal Review, 1(17), 106–112.  https://doi.org/10.12747/bejr2013.01.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bosch-badia, M. T., Montllor-serrats, J., & Tarrazon, M. A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility from Friedman to Porter and Kramer. Theoretical Economics Letters,3(June), 11–15.Google Scholar
  18. Braimah, I., & Oduro-Ofori, E. (2005). Basic school dropout in Ghana: a case study of the Amansie West district. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana),25(1), 67–76.Google Scholar
  19. Brandsen, T., & Vrielink, M. O. (2010). Non-profit organisations, democratisation, and new forms of accountability: A preliminary evaluation. In Social accounting and public management (pp. 104–116). Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Buttle, F. (1989). The social construction of needs. Psychology & Marketing,6(3), 197–210.Google Scholar
  21. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Castro, G. M., Delgado-verde, M., Navas-lópez, J. E., & Cruz-gonzález, J. (2013). The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,80(2), 351–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cegarra-navarro, J., Reverte, C., Eduardo, G., & Wensley, A. K. P. (2016). Linking social and economic responsibilities with financial performance: The role of innovation. European Management Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research,295(2), 295–336.Google Scholar
  25. Christiansen, N. (2014). Business initiatives that overcome rural poverty and marginality through creating shared value. In J. V. Braun & F. W. Gatzweiler (Eds.), Marginality: Addressing the nexus of poverty, exclusion and ecology (pp. 1–389). Basel: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7061-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3150876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics,61(2–3), 267–276.Google Scholar
  28. Crane, A., Pallazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value “creating shared value concept”. California Management Review,56(2), 130–154.  https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Darby, L., & Jenkins, H. (2006). Applying sustainability indicators to the social enterprise business model: The development and application of an indicator set for Newport Wastesavers, Wales. International Journal of Social Economics,33(5/6), 411–431.Google Scholar
  30. Day, G. S., & Day, G. S. (1990). Market driven strategy: Processes for creating value. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. Research on Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to an Emerging Field,1(3), 39–66.Google Scholar
  32. Defourny, J., Hulgard, L., & Pestoff, V. (2010). Social enterprise, social entrepreneurship, social economy, solidarity economy: An EMES reader on the “SE field”. Liege: EMES.Google Scholar
  33. Dembek, K., Singh, P., & Bhakoo, V. (2016). Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics,137(2), 231–267.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2554-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Denning, S. (2011). Why “shared value” can’t fix capitalism. Forbes,12, 20.Google Scholar
  35. Di Zhang, D., & Swanson, L. A. (2013). Social entrepreneurship in nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation of the synergy between social and business objectives. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,25(1), 105–125.Google Scholar
  36. Doyal, L., & Cough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Driver, M. (2012). An interview with Michael Porter: Social entrepreneurship and the transformation of capitalism. Academy of Management Learning & Education,11(3), 421–431.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Emerson, J., & Twersky, F. (1996). New social entrepreneurs: The success, challenge and lessons of non-profit enterprise creation. The Homeless Economic Fund, the Roberts Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Epstein, M. J., & Yuthas, K. J. (2012). Redefining education in the developing world: A new approach that builds relevant marketplace, entrepreneurship, and health care skills is needed. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/busadmin_fac
  40. Epstein-Reeves, J. (2012). What is ‘Creating Shared Value. Forbes: THe CSR Blog.Google Scholar
  41. Essuman, A., & Bosumtwi-sam, C. (2013). School feeding and educational access in rural Ghana: Is poor targeting and delivery limiting impact? International Journal of Educational Development,33(3), 253–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  43. Fowler, A. (1992). Distant obligations: Speculations on NGO funding and the global market. Review of African Political Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03056249208703964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gedzi, V. S., Peprah, D. A., & Cofie, E. N. K. (2018). NGOs, spirituality and community development in Northern Ghana: Challenges and sustainability. Journal of African Political Economy and Development,3(1), 108–126.Google Scholar
  45. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol4/iss1/7.
  46. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research,25(2), 186.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3172650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gotoh, R., & Yoshihara, N. (2003). A class of fair distribution rules a la Rawls and Sen. Economic Theory,22(1), 63–88.Google Scholar
  48. GPRS. (2003). Ghana poverty reduction strategy (20032005), An Agenda for growth and prosperityVol. 1. Analysis and policy statement 2003 (Vol. 1). Accra Ghana: Accra Printing Office.Google Scholar
  49. Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2004). Democratic reform in Africa: The quality of progress. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,19(2), 139–152.Google Scholar
  52. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012a). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340.Google Scholar
  53. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  54. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012b). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,40(3), 414–433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hills, S., Walker, M., & Barry, A. E. (2018). Sport as a vehicle for health promotion: A shared value example of corporate social responsibility. Sport Management Review.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. Yale University, New Haven. New York & London: Appleton-Century.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1944.02850020061030
  60. Imoro, B. (2009). Dimensions of basic school dropouts in rural Ghana: The case of Asutifi District. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana),29(3), 72–85.Google Scholar
  61. Kasser, T. (2003). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Kaul, V. K. (2017). Creation of shared values by Indian enterprises (A. Banik e.). New Delhi: University of Delhi.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5592-8_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology,10(4), 302.Google Scholar
  64. Korhonen, H. (2013). Organizational needs: A co-creation and human systems perspective. jbm: Journal of Business Market Management,6(4), 214–227.Google Scholar
  65. Kramer, H., & Tallant, W. B. (2013). The new role of business in global education. How companies can create shared value by improving education while driving shareholder returns. Harvard Business Review, 1–25. http://sharedvalue.org/new-role-business-global-education.
  66. Kuratko, D. F., McMullen, J. S., Hornsby, J. S., & Jackson, C. (2017). Is your organization conducive to the continuous creation of social value? Toward a social corporate entrepreneurship scale. Business Horizons,60(3), 271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Leandro, L., & Neffa, E. (2012). Is the integration of Shared Value Creation (SVC) with strategy management of productive organizations an innovative approach to environmental challenges faced by companies today. International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research,3(2), 484–489.Google Scholar
  68. Lecy, J. D., & Searing, E. A. M. (2015). Anatomy of the nonprofit starvation cycle: An analysis of falling overhead ratios in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,44(3), 539–563.Google Scholar
  69. Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics,40(3), 693–714.Google Scholar
  70. Lozano, R. (2012). Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: An analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production,25, 14–26.Google Scholar
  71. Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production,19(2), 99–107.Google Scholar
  72. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business,41(1), 36–44.Google Scholar
  73. Malena, C. (1995). Working with NGOsA practical guide to operational collaboration between The World Bank and Non-Governmental Organizations. NGO Unit, World Bank (March), 1–129. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/814581468739240860/pdf/multi-page.pdf.
  74. Maltz, E., & Schein, S. (2012). Cultivating shared value initiatives: A three cs approach. Journal of Corporate Citizenship,47, 55–74.  https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2012.au.00005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Maltz, E., Thompson, F., & Ringold, D. J. (2011). Assessing and maximizing corporate social initiatives: A strategic view of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Affairs,11(4), 344–352.Google Scholar
  76. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review,50(4), 370.Google Scholar
  77. Maslow, A. H. (1967). A theory of metamotivation: The biological rooting of the value-life. Journal of Humanistic Psychology,7(2), 93–127.Google Scholar
  78. Max-Neef M. (1992). Development and human needs. In P. Ekins & M. Max-Neef (Eds.), Real-life economics: Understanding wealth creation (pp. 97–213).  London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. McMullen, J. S., & Bergman, B. J., Jr. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and the development paradox of prosocial motivation: A cautionary tale. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,11(3), 243–270.Google Scholar
  80. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management,37(5), 1480–1495.Google Scholar
  81. Memili, B. E., Fang, H. C., Welsh, D. H. B., Creation, D. H. V., & Appropriation, V. (2015). Value creation and value appropriation in innovation process in publicly-traded family firms. Management Decision,53(9), 1921–1952.Google Scholar
  82. Michelini, L., & Fiorentino, D. (2012). New business models for creating shared value. Social Responsibility Journal,8(4), 561–577.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211272129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Moon, H., Parc, J., Yim, S. H., & Park, N. (2011). An extension of Porter and Kramer’ s creating shared value (CSV): Reorienting strategies and seeking international cooperation. Journal of International and area studies,18(2), 49–64.Google Scholar
  84. Mundy, K., & Murphy, L. (2001). Transnational advocacy, global civil society? Emerging evidence from the field of education. Comparative Education Review,45(1), 85–126.Google Scholar
  85. Nair, P. (2004). India: Desk study of non-state providers of basic services. Birmingham: International Development Department, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  86. Nation United. (2000). World summit on millennium development goals. Retrieved April 7, 2019 fromhttp://www.un.org/millenniumgoals.
  87. Neale, J. (1997). Homelessness and theory reconsidered. Housing Studies,12(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
  88. Nicosia, F. M. (1968). Advertising management, consumer behavior, and simulation. Journal of Advertising Research,8(1), 29–37.Google Scholar
  89. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?bookid=16469.
  90. Nussbaum, M. C. (2004). Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. An Olaf Palme lecture, delivered in Oxford on 19 June 2003. Oxford Development Studies,32(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  91. Nussbaum, M. C., & Glover, J. (1995). Women, culture, and development: A study of human capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Orr, S., & Sarni, W. (2015). Does the concept of “creating shared value” hold water? Journal of Business Strategy,36(3), 18–29.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2013-0098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pavlovich, K., & Corner, P. D. (2013). Conscious enterprise emergence: Shared value creation through expanded conscious awareness. Journal of Business Ethics,121(3), 341–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1726-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pearce, S. M. (1994). Interpreting objects and collections. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  95. Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics,24(4), 309–323.Google Scholar
  96. Pfitzer, M., Bockstette, V., & Stamp, M. (2013). Innovating for shared value. Havard Business Review (September). http://web.b.ebscohost.com.esc-web.lib.cbs.dk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=cb5e15bf-3e99-4b50-a5ab-c8f70cd66f65%40sessionmgr115&vid=1&hid=121.
  97. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review,6(4), 34–43.Google Scholar
  98. Pirson, M. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as the paragons of shared value creation? A critical perspective. Social Enterprise Journal,8(1), 31–48.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211226575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Polites, G. L., Roberts, N., & Thatcher, J. (2012). Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. European Journal of Information Systems,21(1), 22–48.Google Scholar
  100. Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Porter, M. E., Hills, G., Pfitzer, M., Patscheke, S., & Hawkins, E. (2012). Measuring shared value–how to unlock value by linking business and social results. Foundation Strategy Report. Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  102. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039410055963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011b). The big idea: Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard business Review.Google Scholar
  104. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2014). A response to Andrew Crane et al.’s article. California Management Review,56(2), 149–151.Google Scholar
  105. Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing,26(4), 332–344.Google Scholar
  106. Reyes Jr, G., Scholz, M., & Smith, N. C. (2017). Beyond the “Win-Win” creating shared value requires ethical frameworks (No. 2016/67/ATL/ISIC). California Management Review (Vol. 59). Sage, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2848192.
  107. Rose, P. (2007a). Consortium for research on educational access, transitions and equity supporting non-state providers in basic education service delivery research monograph No 4. Access.Google Scholar
  108. Rose, P. (2007b). Supporting non-state providers in basic education service delivery pauline rose. Create Pathways to Access Research Monograph No 4. United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Saeednia, Y. (2011). Generating a scale measuring hierarchy of basic needs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,15, 3084–3094.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sayed, Y., & Soudien, C. (2003). (Re) framing education exclusion and inclusion discourses: Limits and possibilities. IDS Bulletin,34(1), 9–19.Google Scholar
  111. Schmitt, J. (2014). Social innovation for business success: Shared value in the apparel industry. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05461-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schmitt, J., & Renken, U. (2012). How to earn money by doing good! Shared value in the apparel industry (pp. 79–103). Erlangen: University of Erlangen-Nuremberg.Google Scholar
  113. See, G. (2009). Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link? Journal of Business Ethics,89, 1–22.Google Scholar
  114. Simmel, G. (1978). The philosophy of money (T. Bottomore and D. Frisby, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 236, 232.Google Scholar
  115. Simsa, R. (2003). Fighting heroes, repair-workers or collaborators? Strategies of NPOs and their consequences. Financial Accountability and Management,19(3), 225–241.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sinkovics, N., Sinkovics, R. R., & Yamin, M. (2014). The role of social value creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid—Implications for MNEs? International Business Review,23(4), 692–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work. Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4–8.Google Scholar
  118. Spitzeck, H., & Chapman, S. (2012). Creating shared value as a differentiation strategy—The example of BASF in Brazil. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,12(4), 499–513.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211267838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Steinar, Alf Benum, J. D., & Gjærum, I. (2016). Innovation and shared value creation: Balancing the tensions between short term exploitation and long-term sustainability. Norway. https://sisvi.no/
  120. Strutt, C., & Kepe, T. (2010). Implementing education for all-whose agenda, whose change? The case study of the Ghana National Education Campaign Coalition. International Journal of Educational Development,30(4), 369–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Swanson, L. A., & Di Zhang, D. (2010). The social entrepreneurship zone. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,22(2), 71–88.Google Scholar
  122. Szmigin, I., & Rutherford, R. (2013). Shared value and the impartial spectator test. Journal of Business Ethics,114(1), 171–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1335-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies,35(6), 463–483.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Thompson, J., & Doherty, B. (2006). The diverse world of social enterprise: A collection of social enterprise stories. International Journal of Social Economics,33(5/6), 361–375.Google Scholar
  125. Thompson, J. D., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Business models: Creating new markets and societal wealth. Long Range Planning,43(2–3), 291–307.Google Scholar
  126. Unesco. (2003). Gender and education for all: The leap to equality. EFA global monitoring summary report. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  127. UNESCO. (2009). The role and impact of NGOs in capacity development from replacing the state to reinvigorating education. In U. Inger Ulleberg (Ed.). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  128. UNESCO. (2018). Global education monitoring report: Gender review—Meeting our commitments to gender equality in education. Paris 07 SP, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  129. United Nations. (2003). NGO committee concludes 2002 resumed session, with final recommendations on economic and social council consultative status. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2003/ngo494.doc.htm.
  130. Vakil, A. C. (1997). Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs. World Development,25(12), 2057–2070.Google Scholar
  131. Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics,44(2–3), 95–105.Google Scholar
  132. Von Liel, B. (2016). Creating shared value as future factor of competition: Analysis and empirical evidence. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12603-2Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Weerawardena, J., McDonald, R. E., & Mort, G. S. (2010). Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation. Journal of World Business,45(4), 346–356.Google Scholar
  134. Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business,41(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
  135. Weiland, J. (2017). Creating shared value—Concepts, experience, criticism. In R. U. Brink & J. Dahl Rendtorff (Ed.). Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8 Google Scholar
  136. White, S. (1996). Needs, labour, and marx’s conception of justice. Political Studies,44(1), 88–101.Google Scholar
  137. Wójcik, P. (2016). How creating shared value differs from corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management and Business Administration Central Europe,24(2), 32–55.  https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. World Bank. (2010). Education in Ghana improving equity, efficiency and accountability of education service delivery document of the World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/103961468029950786/Education-in-Ghana-improving-equity-efficiency-and-accountability-of-education-service-delivery.
  139. Yunus, M. (2007). The Nobel peace prize 2006-Nobel lecture. Law and Business Review of the Americas,13, 267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing, School of ManagementJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsTamale Technical UniversityTamaleGhana
  3. 3.Department of MarketingTamale Technical UniversityTamaleGhana

Personalised recommendations