Advertisement

Normative Management and Diversity in International Non-government Organizations

  • Joshua R. KnappEmail author
  • Mathew L. Sheep
Original Paper
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

To accomplish their goals, International Non-government Organizations (INGOs) manage a network of internal and external stakeholders across national boundaries while having limited authority under demanding circumstances. Consequently, INGOs often rely on normative management practices aimed at influencing discretionary behavior. Unfortunately, normative management can be difficult when INGO stakeholders perceive little common ground due to large functional, cultural, socioeconomic, and power differences. These dynamics raise an important question: How can INGOs manage internal and external stakeholders in a normative fashion when these stakeholders are remarkably diverse and may perceive little or no similarity among themselves? In response to this difficulty, we argue that effective diversity management is a key contributor of effective normative management, and we develop social cognitive theory aimed at managing the salience and meaning of social distinctions. We also provide initial guidance on adapting management practices when differences are large and when individual identities are exclusive.

Keywords

International Non-government Organizations Diversity Discretionary behavior Social categorization 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

This research complies with all Voluntas ethical standards.

References

  1. Agrawala, S., Ota, T., Ahmed, A. U., Smith, J., & Aalst, M. (2003). Development and climate change in Bangladesh: Focus on costal flooding and the sundarbans. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://search.oecd.org/environment/cc/21055658.pdf.
  2. All Hands and Hearts. (2019). About us. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.allhandsandhearts.org/about-us/.
  3. Arenas, D., Lozano, J. M., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 175–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0109-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashman, D. (2001). Strengthening north–south partnerships for sustainable development. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 74–98.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001301004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atran, S., & Ginges, J. (2012). Religious and sacred imperatives inhuman conflict. Science, 336, 855–857.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., Krejci, C. C., Muramatsu, K. M., & Ramirez, M. (2010). Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: Practices, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 22–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, N. A. (2014). Did we do good? NGOs, conflicts of interest and the evaluation of short term medical missions in Sololá, Guatemala. Social Science and Medicine, 120, 344–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloul, R. A. D. (1999). Beyond ethnic identity: Resisting exclusionary identification. Social Identities, 5, 7–30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504639951590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolton, M., & Nash, T. (2010). The role of middle power-NGO coalitions in global policy: The case of the cluster munitions ban. Global Policy, 1, 172–184.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00015.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–38). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Bratton, M. (1989). The politics of government-NGO relations in Africa. World Development, 17, 569–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90263-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1988). Contact and cooperation: When do they work? In P. Katz & D. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Means and controversies (pp. 315–326). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brinkerhoff, D. W. (1999). Exploring state-civil society collaboration: Policy partnerships in developing countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 59–86.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089976409902801S01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, L. D. (1991). Bridging organizations and sustainable development. Human Relations, 44, 807–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, L. D., & Kalegaonkar, A. (2002). Support organizations and the evolution of the NGO sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 231–258.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002312004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chandy, L., & Kharas, H. (2011). Why can’t we all just get along? The practical limits to international development cooperation. Journal of International Development, 23, 739–751.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang, W. (2005). Expatriate training in international nongovernmental organizations: A model for research. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 440–461.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305281035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chemin, C., & Vercher, C. (2011). The challenge of activist coalition governance: Accommodating diversity to create institutions—An approach via the inter-relationships between action, project and instrument. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 682–705.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9201-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chua, R. Y. J. (2013). The costs of ambient cultural disharmony: Indirect intercultural conflicts in social environment undermine creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1545–1577.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Claeyé, F. (2014). Managing nongovernmental organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Claire, T., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). A systemic view of behavioral confirmation: Counterpoint to the individualist view. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 205–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32, 761–773.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., Oetzel, J., & Yaziji, M. (2010). Corporate-NGO collaboration: Co creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Planning, 43, 326–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. EENET. (2019). What we do. https://www.eenet.org.uk/whatwe-do/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
  28. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ely, R. J. (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 755–780.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389–412.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 75–90.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferdman, B. M. (2014). The practice of inclusion in diverse organizations: Toward a systemic and inclusive framework. In B. M. Ferdman & B. R. Deane (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303–315.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social-perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155–194.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Foreman, K. (1999). Evolving global structures and the challenges facing international relief and development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 178–197.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089976499773746519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fowler, A. (2012). Measuring civil society: Perspectives on Afro-centrism. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 5–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9239-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fox, J. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.2015.03.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fredette, C., Bradshaw, P., & Krause, H. (2016). From diversity to inclusion: A multimethod study of diverse governing groups. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(S), 28–51.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015599456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22, 7–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B., Houlette, M., Johnson, K., & McGlynn, E. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics, 4, 98–114.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype, an in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gay, C. (2006). Seeing difference: The effect of economic disparity on black attitudes toward Latinos. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 982–997.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00228.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Giacalone, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Goldman, M. J., & Little, J. S. (2015). Innovative grassroots NGOs and the complex processes of women’s empowerment: An empirical investigation from Northern Tanzania. World Development, 66, 762–777.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grassroot Soccer. (2019). What we do. https://www.grassrootsoccer.org/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
  47. Harris, A., & Dombrowski, P. (2002). Military collaboration with humanitarian organizations in complex emergencies. Global Governance, 8, 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, J. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heurlin, C. (2010). Governing civil society: The political logic of NGO-State relations under dictatorship. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2, 220–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9103-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, depersonalization, and group behavior. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 57–85). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., & Farquharson, J. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1061–1066.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189–1199.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). (2019). The seven fundamental principles. http://www.ifrc.org/who-we-are/vision-and-mission/the-seven-fundamental-principles/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
  55. Jakimow, T. (2010). Negotiating the boundaries of voluntarism: Values in the Indian NGO sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21, 546–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klein, J. J., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). On the diversity of diversity: Tidy logic, messier realities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 26–33.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.27895337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., et al. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42, 3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kovács, G., & Spens, K. (2009). Identifying challenges in humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39, 506–528.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030910985848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kramer, R. M. (1998). Paranoid cognition in social systems: Thinking and acting in the shadow of a doubt. Personality and Social Psychology Review.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_3.Google Scholar
  60. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). ‘Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1031–1057.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lefebvre, R. C. (2013). Social marketing and social change: Strategies and tools for health, well-being, and the environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Leslie, L. M. (2018). Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy of Management Review.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0087.Google Scholar
  63. Lewis, D. (2002). Organization and management in the third sector: Toward a cross-cultural agenda. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 13, 67–83.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.13106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lewis, D. (2007). The management of Non-governmental Development Organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Li, S. X., Dogan, K., & Haruvy, E. (2011). Group identity in markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29, 104–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mackie, G., Moneti, F., Shakya, H., & Denny, E. (2015). What are social norms? How are they measured? United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. https://www.unicef.org/protection/files/4_09_30_Whole_What_are_Social_Norms.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2019.
  67. Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13, 271–285.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020341526691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mawdsley, E., Townsend, J. G., & Porter, G. (2005). Trust, accountability, and face-to-face interaction in north–south NGO relations. Development in Practice, 15, 77–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/096145249100076011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McKeown, S., Haji, R., & Ferguson, N. (2016). Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McPeak, M. (2001). Tackling fragmentation and building unity in an international nongovernmental organization. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11, 477–491.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.11406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Muller, E. N., & Seligson, M. A. (1987). Inequality and insurgency. The American Political Science Review, 81, 425–452.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1961960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Najam, A. (2000). The four-C’s of third sector-government relations: Cooperation, confrontation, complementarity, and co-optation. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10, 375–396.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.10403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of comping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nezhina, T. G., & Ibrayeva, A. R. (2013). Explaining the role of culture and traditions in functioning of civil society organizations in Kazakhstan. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 335–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9256-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Oakes, P. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. Turner (Ed.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 117–141). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
  76. One. (2019). Diversity and inclusion. https://www.one.org/us/about/diversity/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
  77. Othman, N. (2006). Muslim women and the challenge of Islamic fundamentalism/extremism: An overview of Southeast Asian Muslim women’s struggle for human rights and gender equality. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 339–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Oxfam International. (2019). Success stories. https://www.oxfam.org/en/tags/success-stories. Accessed 10 January 2019.
  79. Paluck, E. L. (2010). Is it better not to talk? Group polarization, extended contact, and perspective taking in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1170–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210379868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Petersen, M. J. (2012). Islamizing aid: Transnational Muslim NGOs after 9.11. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 126–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9185-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., & van Dierendonck, D. (2013). Cultural diversity and team performance: The role of team member goal orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 782–804.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pillay, D. (2003). The challenge of partnerships between the state, capital, and civil society: The case of media development and diversity agency in South Africa. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14, 401–420.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000007466.15202.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., & Goren, M. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities? Psychological Science, 20, 444–446.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Polzer, J. T., Milton, L. P., & Swarm, W. B. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296–324.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3094807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ramarajan, L., Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Euwema, M., & Kop, N. (2004). Relationship between peacekeepers and NGO workers: The role of training and conflict management styles in international peacekeeping. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 167–191.  https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Reindorp, N., & Wiles, P. (2001). Humanitarian coordination: Lessons from recent field experience. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Retrieved September 9, 2017, from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4186.pdf.
  88. Richter, A. (2014). Building a culture of inclusion: The case of UNAIDS. In B. M. Ferdman & B. R. Deane (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  89. Roberts, N. C. (2010). Spanning “bleeding” boundaries: Humanitarianism, NGOs, and the Civilian-Military Nexus in the post-Cold War era. Public Administration Review, 70, 211–222.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02135_2.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Associates. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. 2). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  91. Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Seul, J. R. (1999). ‘Ours is the way of god’: Religion, identity and intergroup conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 36, 553–569.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343399036005004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37, 1262–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. South, A. (2008). Ethnic politics in Burma. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Wolfe, C. T., Fong, C., & Dunn, M. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139–1152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982411001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stephenson, M., & Schnitzer, M. H. (2006). Interorganizational trust, boundary spanning, and humanitarian relief coordination. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17, 211–233.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression—Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Swann, W. J., Polzer, J. T., Seyle, D. C., & Ko, S. J. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review, 29, 9–27.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.11851702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  100. Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00135-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Thévenaz, C., & Resodihardjo, S. L. (2010). All the best laid plans…conditions impeding proper emergency response. International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 7–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.09.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving Intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 374–387.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. UN News. (2016). UN uses virtual reality to inspire humanitarian empathy. https://news.un.org/en/story/2016/05/529752-feature-un-uses-virtual-reality-inspire-humanitarian-empathy. Accessed 10 January 2019.
  104. United Nations. (1996) ECOSOC Resolution E/1996/31. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from http://www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/res/1996/eres1996-31.htm.
  105. Urban, L. M., & Miller, N. (1998). A theoretical analysis of crossed categorization effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 894–908.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2005). Category salience and organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 273–285.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X25779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Weisinger, J. Y., Borges-Méndez, R., & Milofsky, C. (2016). Diversity in the nonprofit and voluntary sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1s), 3s–27s.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015613568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Weisinger, J. Y., & Salipante, P. F. (2005). A grounded theory for building ethnically bridging social capital in voluntary organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 29–55.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004270069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin-WhitewaterWhitewaterUSA
  2. 2.Lutgert College of BusinessFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityFort MyersUSA

Personalised recommendations