Taking Care of the Refugees: Exploring Advocacy and Cross-sector Collaboration in Service Provision for Refugees
This article explores the interplay and collaboration between refugee organization volunteers and social service professionals. On the basis of qualitative interviews and observations, we study how volunteers from Danish local refugee organizations experience their interaction with refugees and social service professionals, and how they act and perceive their role as advocates for the refugees. The purpose is to gain insight into the everyday practices and strategies of civil society organizations attempting to balance the demands and interests of stakeholders and internal legitimacy claims in a hybrid environment. In addition to providing effective refugee assistance and services, refugee organizations achieve legitimacy through professional communication, campaign work, and networking with key political actors and stakeholders. However, although it may be less visible, advocacy-oriented activities also take place in local organizations at ‘street level.’ We identified three distinct types of strategies to balance issues of autonomy in the collaborative relationship with the municipalities and simultaneously engage in advocacy activities.
KeywordsVolunteers Advocacy Refugees Public service professionals Cross-sector collaboration Hybridity
The authors wish to thank Nordea Foundation and the participating municipalities for supporting this work. We also thank Bjarne Ibsen, University of Southern Denmark, the anonymous reviwers, and the journal editors for their helpful and constructive comments.
- Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2004). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Bass, G. D., Arons, D. F., Kay Guinane, K., & Carter, M. F. (2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
- Bekendtgørelse af lov om integration af udlændinge i Danmark. (2014). LBK nr 1094 af 07/10/2014 https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/r0710.aspx?id=163323.
- Bernard, H. R. (1994). Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. In H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Research methods in anthropology. Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 208–236). Sage.Google Scholar
- Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Casey, J. (2011). Understanding advocacy: A primer on the policy-making role of non-profit Organizations. Working Paper series. July 2011. Center for Nonprofit Strategy and Management. New York: Baruch College. http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/mspia/centers-and-institutes/center-for-nonprofit-strategy-and-management/documents/Casey_UnderstandingAdvocacyaPrimeronthePolicyMakingRoleofNonoprofitOrganizations.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2018.
- Clark, J. D. (2010). Advocacy. In H. K. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of civil society (pp. 12–18). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Dansk Flygtningehjælp: Dansk Flygtninghjælps fortalerarbejde (Notat). Retrieved January 12, 2018 from https://flygtning.dk/media/1143263/dansk-flygtningehjaelps-fortalerarbejde.pdf.
- Donnelly-Cox, G. (2015). Civil society governance—Hybridization within third-sector and social enterprise domains. In J.-L. Laville, D. R. Young, & P. Eynaud (Eds.), Civil society, the third sector and social enterprise—Governance and democracy (pp. 30–45). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ejrnæs, A. (2014). Det etnisk mangfoldige samfund. In B. Greve, A. Jørgensen, & J. L. Larsen (Eds.), Det danske samfund (pp. 385–412). Hans Reitzens forlag: København.Google Scholar
- Evers, A., & Laville, J. L. (2004). Defining the third sector in Europe. In A. Evers & J. L. Laville (Eds.), The third sector in Europe (pp. 11–42). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hustinx, L. (2014). Volunteering in a hybrid institutional and organizational environment: An emerging research agenda. In M. Freis & T. Hallmann (Eds.), Modernizing democracy—Associations and associating in the 21st century (pp. 99–111). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ibsen, B., & Espersen, H. H. (2016). Kommunernes samarbejde med civile aktører: Forskelle og ligheder i forventninger, praksis, samarbejdspartnere og oplevet udbytte. København: KORA - Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning.Google Scholar
- Johansson, H., Arvidson, M., & Johansson, S. (2015). Welfare mix as a contested terrain: Political positions on government-non-profit relations at national and local levels in a social democratic welfare state. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1601–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9580-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jørgensen, M. B., & Thomsen, T. L. (2013). Crisis now and then—Comparing integration policy frameworks and immigrant target groups in denmark in the 1970s and 2000s. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14(2), 245–262.Google Scholar
- Kommunernes Landsforening. (2015). Analyse af Kommunernes integrationsindsats. København: KL Notat. http://www.kl.dk/ImageVaultFiles/id_75762/cf_202/Analyse_af_kommunernes_integrationsindsats.PDF.
- Onyx, J., Armitage, L., Dalton, B., Melville, R., Casey, J., & Banks, R. (2010). Advocacy with gloves on: The ‘manners’ of strategy used by some third sector organizations undertaking advocacy in NSW and Queensland. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Petersen, K., & Jønsson, H. V. (2012). Denmark: A national welfare state meets the world. In G. Brochmann & A. Hagelund (Eds.), Immigration policy and the Scandinavian welfare state 1945–2010 (pp. 97–148). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Reid, E. J. (1999). Nonprofit advocacy and political participation. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 291–325). Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L. M. (2002). Explaining nonprofit advocacy: An exploratory analysis. Working Paper series. No. 21. Center for Civil Society Studies. John Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
- Spradley, J. (1980). Ethnography and culture. In J. P. Spradley (Ed.), Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rheinhardt and Winston.Google Scholar