Advertisement

Rescuing Welfare Society: Political Strategies for Mobilizing Civil Society in Denmark, 2010–2018

  • Mathias Hein JessenEmail author
Original Paper
  • 199 Downloads

Abstract

The article analyzes how civil society is constructed in two Danish civil society strategies from 2010 to 2017, the governmental programmes of the governments in question and the role civil society plays in the proposed upcoming reform of the Danish public sector, the Cohesion Reform. The article approaches civil society from a Foucauldian perspective meaning that it on the one hand analyzes civil society as a transactional reality, something which does not exist as such, but must be continually produced as a given thing with certain values. On the other hand, it means analyzing civil society as a central part of a governmental rationality, or governmentality, which represents the natural movements of society and which government must respect and govern according to. This means that the natural, vital and originary processes of civil society becomes a measurement for good and right government in contradistinction to the artificial, cold and bureaucratic state and thereby posited as the rescuer of welfare society.

Keywords

Civil society Governmentality Foucault Austerity Welfare retrenchment Voluntary organizations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the two reviewers of this article for very thorough comments and constructive criticism that has helped improve this article.

Funding

This study was funded by The Carlsberg Foundation, Semper Ardens research project CISTAS—Civil Society in the Shadow of the State (http://www.cistas.dk/).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersen, N. Å. (2008). Partnerships: Machines of possibility. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996a). Introduction. Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 1–17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996b). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blyth, M. (2015). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boje, T. P. (2015). Citizenship, democratic participation, and civil society. In Voluntary work and youth unemploymentcontributions from the conference on VERSO (pp. 27–44). Department of Education (DPU), Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1.  https://doi.org/10.2307/202032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandsen, T., Trommel, W., & Verschuere, B. (2017). The state and the reconstruction of civil society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(4), 676–693.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315592467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandsen, T., Trommel, W. A., & Verschuere, B. (2014a). Manufacturing civil society: Principles, practices and effects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., & Trommel, W. (2014b). Manufacturing civil society: An introduction. Manufacturing civil society: Principles, practices and effects (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bundesen, P., Henriksen, L. S. & Jørgensen, A. (2001). Filantropi, selvhjælp og interesseorganisering: Frivillige organisationer i dansk socialpolitik 1849–1990'erne. Odense: Odense UniversitetsforlagGoogle Scholar
  11. Burchell, G. (1991). Peculiar interests: Civil society and governing “the system of natural liberty”. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 119–150). Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1999). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  16. Dean, M., & Villadsen, K. (2016). State phobia and civil society: The political legacy of Michel Foucault. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Finansministeriet. (2017). Pressemeddelelse—Mai Mercado og Sophie Løhde nedsætter task force for civilsamfundet. Finansministeriet. Retrieved August 31, 2017, from https://www.fm.dk/nyheder/pressemeddelelser/2017/06/mai-mercado-og-sophie-loehde-nedsaetter-task-force-for-civilsamfundet.
  18. Finansministeriet. (2018). Færre regler og mindre bureaukrati. København: Finansministeriet.Google Scholar
  19. Finansministeriet, & Regeringen. (2017). Sammenhængsreform: borgeren først—en mere sammenhængende offentlig sektor. København: Finansministeriet.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Frederiksen, M. (2015). Dangerous, commendable or compliant: How Nordic people think about volunteers as providers of public welfare services. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1739–1758.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9578-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fridberg, T., & Henriksen, L. S. (2014). Udviklingen i frivilligt arbejde 2004–2012. København: SFI - Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Velfærd.Google Scholar
  25. Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Greve, C. (2006). Public management reform in Denmark. Public Management Review, 8(1), 161–169.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030500518956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Habermann, U. Ibsenm, B. (1998). “Den frivillige sektor i Danmark - 150 års historisk udvikling”. In Frivilligt socialt arbejde i fremtidens velfærdssamfund, Udvalget om frivilligt socialt arbejde. København:SocialministerietGoogle Scholar
  28. Habermas, J. (2001). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Henriksen, L. S. (2015). Contradictions and controversies in Danish civil society discourse. In Voluntary work and youth unemploymentContributions from the conference on VERSO (pp. 17–25). Department of Education (DPU), Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  30. Henriksen, L. S., & Bundesen, P. (2004). The moving frontier in Denmark: Voluntary-state relationships since 1850. Journal of Social Policy, 33(4), 605–625.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2012). At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany, and the United States. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(2), 458–501.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9221-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2015). Welfare mix and hybridity. Flexible adjustments to changed environments. Introduction to the special issue. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1591–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9622-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen, H. G. (2012). Menneskekærlighedens værk: det danske civilsamfund før velfærdsstaten. København: CEPOS.Google Scholar
  34. Jensen, N. R. (2015). Introduction: Voluntary work, unemployment, and the changing welfare state—In search of an alternative solution. In Voluntary work and youth unemploymentcontributions from the conference on VERSO (pp. 5–16). Department of Education (DPU), Aarhus University, 2015.Google Scholar
  35. Kaspersen, L. B., & Ottesen, L. (2006). Associationalism for 150 years and still alive and kicking: Some reflections on Danish civil society. In P. Hirst & V. Bader (Eds.), Associative democracy: The real third way (pp. 105–130). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  36. La Cour, A. (2014). Frivillighedens logik og dens politik: en analyse af den personrettede frivillige sociale indsats og statens frivillighedspolitik. Frederiksberg: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.Google Scholar
  37. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  38. Lemke, T. (2000). Neoliberalismus, Staat und Selbsttechnologien. Ein kritischer Überblick über die governmentality studies. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 41(1), 31–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-000-0003-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Økonomi- og Indennrigsministeriet, & Erhvervsministeriet. (2018). Konkurrenceudsættelse—den bedst muligeservice for pengene. København: Økonomi- og Indenrigsministeriet: Erhvervsministeriet.Google Scholar
  40. Regeringen. (2010). Danmark 2020: viden, vækst, velstand, velfærd. København: Regeringen.Google Scholar
  41. Regeringen. (2016). For et friere, rigere og mere trygt Danmark: regeringsgrundlag, Marienborgaftalen 2016. København: Regeringen.Google Scholar
  42. Regeringen, & Børne- og Socialministeriet. (2017). Strategi for et stærkere civilsamfund. København: Regeringen, & Børne- og Socialministeriet.Google Scholar
  43. Regeringen, & Finansministeriet. (2017). Fair og lige konkurrence. København: Regeringen, & Finansministeriet.Google Scholar
  44. Regeringen, & Socialministeriet. (2010). National civilsamfundsstrategi: en styrket inddragelse af civilsamfundet og frivillige organisationer i den sociale indsats. København: Regeringen, & Socialministeriet.Google Scholar
  45. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.  https://doi.org/10.2307/591464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saar, M. (2011). Relocating the modern state: Governmentality and the history of political ideas. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges (pp. 34–55). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Sevelsted, A. L. (2017). Interpreting bonds and boundaries of obligation: A genealogy of the emergence and development of protestant voluntary social work in Denmark as shown through the cases of the Copenhagen Home Mission and the blue cross (1850–1950), Doctoral dissertation. Frederiksberg: Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
  49. Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1083–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Villadsen, K. (2016). Michel Foucault and the forces of civil society. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(3), 3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415581895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Villadsen, K., & Dean, M. (2012). State-phobia, civil society, and a certain vitalism. Constellations, 19(3), 401–420.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cons.12006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Politics and PhilosophyCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations