Advertisement

Power-effective ROM-less DDFS Design Approach with High SFDR Performance

  • Chua-Chin WangEmail author
  • Nanang Sulistiyanto
  • Hsiang-Yu Shih
  • Yu-Cheng Lin
  • Wei Wang
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

A ROM-less direct digital frequency synthesizer (DDFS) design approach based on interpolation schemes is proposed in this work. Besides achieving higher SFDR (spurious free dynamic range) and faster clock rate, detailed power estimation approach based on switching activity analysis of each logic sub-blocks is presented to explore the optimal solution. The parabolic equations with proper selection of coefficients and pipeline structure are utilized to enhance SFDR. A ROM-less DDFS using the proposed design approach is demonstrated by the physical implementation on Altera FPGA platform. The average SFDR is measured to be 68.4242 dBc with 1.1659 dBc deviation over 33 times of experiments. The measured SFDR is proved to outperform many previous DDFS works even if they were implemented on silicon.

Keywords

ROM-less DDFS Spurious free dynamic range (SFDR) Parabolic polynomial interpolation Pipeline structure Power estimation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This investigation is partially supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grant MOST 107-2218-E-110-004- and 107-2221-E-006-232-. The authors would also like to express their deepest gratefulness to Chip Implementation Center of National Applied Research Laboratories, Taiwan, for their thoughtful chip fabrication service and EDA tool support.

References

  1. 1.
    Sun, Y., Yu, X., Rhee, W., Wang, D., Wang, Z. (2010). A fast settling dual-path fractional-N PLL with hybrid-mode dynamic bandwidth control. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 20(8), 462–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tierney, J., Rader, C., Gold, B. (1971). A digital frequency synthesizer. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 19(1), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pontikakis, B., Bui, H.-T., Boyer, F.-R., Savaria, Y. (2007). Precise free-running period synthesizer (FRPS) with process and temperature compensation. In: IEEE MidWest Symposium on Circuits and Systems 2007 (MWSCAS ’07) (pp. 1118–1121).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sotiriadis, P. (2009). Timing and spectral properties of the Flying Adder frequency synthesizers. IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium, 2009, 788–792.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, C.-C., Hsu, C.-H., Lee, C.-C., Huang, J.-M. (2010). A ROM-less DDFS based on a parabolic polynomial interpolation method with an offset. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 61, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cali, J., Geng, X., Zhao, F., Pukish, M., Dai, F., Aklian, A. (2013). A 650 MHz DDFS for stretch processing radar in 130nm biCMOS process. In Proc. European Microwave Integrated Circuit Conference (EMICC) (pp. 33–36).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Padash, M., Toofan, S., Yargholi, M. (2014). A 9-bit, 1-giga samples per second sine and cosine direct digital frequency synthesizer. In Proc. Iranian Conf. on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) (pp 438–442).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Carvalho, P.R.B., Palacio, J.A.A., Van Noije, W. (2016). Area optimized CORDIC-based numerically controlled oscillator for electrical bio-impedance spectroscopy. In Proc. IEEE Int. Freq. Control Symposium (IFCS) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsu, C.-H., Chen, Y.-C., Wang, C.-C. (2011). ROM-less DDFS using non-equal division parabolic polynomial interpolation method. In Proc. Int. Symp. on Integrated Circuits (ISIC) (pp. 59–62).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geng, X., Dai, F.F., Irwin, J.D., Jaeger, R.C. (2010). An 11-Bit 8.6 GHz direct digital synthesizer MMIC with 10-Bit segmented sine-weighted DAC. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (JSSC), 45(2), 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, C.-C., Huang, J.-M., Tseng, Y.-L., Lin, W.-J., Hu, R. (2006). Phase-adjustable pipelining ROM-less direct digital frequency synthesizer with a 41.66-MHz output frequency. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 53(10), 1143–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lopelli, E., van der Tang, J.D., Roermund, A.H.M. (2009). Minimum power-consumption estimation in ROM-based DDFS for frequency-hopping ultralow-power transmitters. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 56(1), 256–267.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsai, J.-Y. (2007). Low power techniques for digital IC design. CICeNEWS, 86, 1–22.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, W., Xu, Y.-Y., Wang, C.-C. (2017). Dynamic power estimation for ROM-less DDFS designs using switching activity analysis. In 2017 The 14th Inter. SoC Design Conf. (pp. 280–281).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alonso, A.M., Yuan, X., Miyahara, M., Matsuzawa, A. (2017). A 2 GS/s 118 mW digital-mapping direct digital frequency synthesizer in 65nm CMOS. In 12th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (ISSCC 2003) (pp. 228–231).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suryavanshi, R., Sridevi, S., Amrutur, B. (2017). A comparative study of direct digital frequency synthesizer architectures in 180 nm CMOS. In International Conference on Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems. (ICMDCS 2017) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringNational Sun Yat-Sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Engineering ScienceNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  3. 3.The College of Electronics Engineering and International SemiconductorChongqing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations