Advertisement

Virus Genes

pp 1–5 | Cite as

Genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of a novel comovirus from tabasco pepper (Capsicum frutescens)

  • Ricardo Iván Alcalá-Briseño
  • Pongtharin Lotrakul
  • Rodrigo A. ValverdeEmail author
Short Report

Abstract

A virus isolate from tabasco pepper (Capsicum frutescens) has been reported as a strain of the comovirus Andean potato mottle virus (APMoV). Using the replicative intermediate viral dsRNA, the pepper virus strain was sequenced by Illumina MiSeq. The viral genome was de novo assembled resulting in two RNAs with lengths of 6028 and 3646 nt. Nucleotide sequence analysis indicated that they corresponded to the RNA-1 and RNA-2 of a novel comovirus which we tentatively named pepper mild mosaic virus (PepMMV). Predictions of the open reading frame (ORF) of RNA-1 resulted in a single ORF of 5871 nt with five cistrons typical of comoviruses, cofactor proteinase, helicase, viral protein genome-linked, 3C-like proteinase (Pro), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). Similarly, sequence analysis of RNA-2 resulted in a single ORF of 3009 nt with two cistrons typical of comoviruses: movement protein and coat protein (large coat protein and small coat proteins). In pairwise amino acid sequence alignments using the Pro-Pol protein, PepMMV shared the closest identities with broad bean true mosaic virus and cowpea mosaic virus, 56% and 53.9% respectively. In contrast, in alignments of the amino acid sequence of the coat protein (small and large coat proteins) PepMMV shared the closest identities to APMoV and red clover mottle virus, 54% and 40.9% respectively. A phylogenetic tree constructed using the conserved domains for the Pro-Pol from all members of the family Secoviridae confirmed the comovirus nature of the virus. Phylogenetic and sequence analyses supports proposing PepMMV as a new species of the genus Comovirus.

Keywords

Capsicum annuum dsRNA Next generation sequencing Replicative intermediate dsRNA Secoviridae 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Andrea Hebert, Middleton Library, Louisiana State University, for proof reading the manuscript.

Author contributions

RIA-B conducted the phylogenetic and sequence analyses. PL conducted preliminary RT-PCR experiments and analyses of sequences of PCR products. RAV planned the experiments, conducted dsRNA purifications, and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

Partial support for this investigation was provided by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

11262_2019_1707_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (220 kb)
Supplementary file1 (PDF 219 kb)
11262_2019_1707_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (300 kb)
Supplementary file2 (PDF 300 kb)
11262_2019_1707_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (365 kb)
Supplementary file3 (PDF 364 kb)
11262_2019_1707_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (259 kb)
Supplementary file4 (PDF 259 kb)
11262_2019_1707_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (261 kb)
Supplementary file5 (PDF 260 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kenyon L, Kumar S, Tsai W-S, Hughes JDA (2014) Virus diseases of peppers (Capsicum spp.) and their control. Adv Virus Res 90:297–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801246-8.00006-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson JR, Dasgupta I, Fuchs M, Iwanami T, Karasev AV, Petrzik K, Sanfaçon H, Tzanetakis IE, van der Vlugt R, Wetzel T, Yoshikawa N, ICTV Report Consortium (2017) ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Secoviridae. J Gen Virol 98:529–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maina S, Edwards OR, Jones RAC (2017) Two complete genome sequences of Squash mosaic virus from 20-year-old cucurbit leaf samples from Australia. Genome Announc 5:e00778–e817.  https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00778-17 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valverde RA, Fulton JP (1996) Comoviruses: Identification and diseases caused. In: Harrison BD (ed) The plant viruses: polyhedral virions and bipartite rna genomes. Plenum Publishing, New York, pp 17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valverde RA, Black LL, Dufresne DJ (1995) A comovirus affecting tabasco pepper in Central America. Plant Dis 79:421–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maliogka V, Dovas CI, Efthimiou K, Katis NI (2004) Detection and differentiation of Comoviridae using a semi-nested RT-PCR and phylogenetic analysis based on the polymerase protein. J Phytopathol 152:404–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA (2012) SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comp Biol 19:455–477.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Afouda L, Kone D, Zinsou V, Dossou L, Kenyon L, Winter S, Knierim D (2017) Virus surveys of Capsicum spp. in the Republic of Benin reveal the prevalence of pepper vein yellows virus and the identification of a previously uncharacterised polerovirus species. Arch Virol 162:1599–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arli-Sokmen A, Mennan H, Sevik MA, Ecevit O (2005) Occurrence of viruses in field-grown pepper crops and some of their reservoir weed hosts in Samsun, Turkey. Phytoparasitica 33:343–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolou Bi BA, Moury B, Abo K, Sorho F, Cherif M, Girardot G, Kouassi NP, Kone D (2018) Survey of viruses infecting open-field pepper crops in Côte d'Ivoire and diversity of Pepper veinal mottle virus and Cucumber mosaic virus. Plant Pathol 67:1416–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dufresne DJ, Valverde RA, Hobbs HA (2000) Effects of coinfections of Andean potato mottle comovirus with two potyviruses in seven Capsicum genotypes. Rev Mex Fitopatol 17:17–22Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madeira F, Park YM, Lee J, Buso N, Gur T, Madhusoodanan N, Basutkar P, Tvery ARN, Potter SC, Finn RD, Lopez R (2019) The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acid Res.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz268 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast 23 and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood 24 phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muhire BM, Varsani A, Martin DP (2014) SDT: a virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation. PLoS ONE 9(9):e108277.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108277 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acid Res 30:3059–3066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hornik K (2018) The R FAQ. https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html. Accessed 1 June 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Plant PathologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Botany, Faculty of ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Dept. of Plant Pathology and Crop PhysiologyLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations