Plant Ecology

, Volume 220, Issue 11, pp 1021–1028 | Cite as

Effects of soil type, period of burial and moisture levels on the germination of Oncocyclus iris seeds

  • Sergei VolisEmail author
  • Michael Dorman


Understanding germination of seeds constituting a persistent soil seed bank is important because the ability to predict longevity of a seed in soil and a particular combination of environmental conditions supporting dormancy break and germination can be critical for restoration of threatened species having poor regeneration. We studied the pattern of germination under experimentally manipulated environmental conditions in several threatened iris species of section Oncocyclus. In the first experiment, spanning 11 years, we manipulated soil type and precipitation regime, and in the second experiment, spanning 7 years, we tested an effect of cumulative amount of rainfall during a season on germination. In all studied species the germination process was intermittent, with distinct germination pulses separated by years with no or very low germination. High innate dormancy appears to be a general property of newly produced seeds of Oncocyclus irises, but there are exceptions. Although in three tested Oncocyclus species considerable (above 25%) germination fraction was observed only in the second and subsequent seasons regardless of the soil moisture experienced by a seed, in Iris atropurpurea it occurred in the first season under watering equivalent or exceeding cumulative seasonal precipitation of 100 mm. In the three other species, although high cumulative germination percentage was observed by year four under all experimental conditions a substantial fraction of seeds was still ungerminated and viable. Our results have important conservation implications. We recommend for mass seed germination creation of a soil seed bank under natural conditions with minimal modifications, monitored for more than two years. Supplementary watering (if feasible) will speed up the germination process and shading will have a similar effect but neither of these two is a requirement.


Seed dormancy Sequential germination Iris Oncocyclus 



This project was supported by a Grant from the Israel Ministry of Sciences and a grant from Israel Nature and Parks Authority.


  1. Arafeh RMH, Sapir Y, Shmida A, Iraki N, Fragman O, Comes HP (2002) Patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation in Iris haynei and I. atrofusca (Iris sect. Oncocyclus = the royal irises) along an ecogeographical gradient in Israel and the West Bank. Mol Ecol 11:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avishai M (1977) Species relationships and cytogenetic affinities in section Oncocyclus of the genus Iris. PhD Thesis, The Hebrew University of JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  3. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baskin JM, Baskin CC (2004) A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci Res 14:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumenthal A, Lerner HR, Werker E, Poljakoff-Mayber A (1986) Germination preventing mechanisms in Iris seeds. Ann Bot 58:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen D (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 12:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen O, Avishai M (2000) The Irises still exist: the conservation status of species Iris section Oncocyclus in Israel, a century after their description. Annali Di Botanica 58:145–160Google Scholar
  8. Dorman M, Melnikov P, Sapir Y, Volis S (2009) Factors affecting dormancy of Oncocyclus iris seeds. Isr J Plant Sci 57:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott CP, Lewandrowski W, Miller BP, Barrett M, Turner SR (2019) Identifying germination opportunities for threatened plant species in episodic ecosystems by linking germination profiles with historic rainfall events. Aust J Bot 67:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fenner M, Thompson K (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finch-Savage WE, Leubner-Metzger G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol 171:501–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godefroid S, Piazza C, Rossi G, Buord S, Stevens A-D, Aguraiuja R, Cowell C, Weekley CW, Vogg G, Iriondo JM, Johnson I, Dixon B, Gordon DR, Magnanon S, Valentin B, Bjureke K, Koopman R, Vicens M, Virevaire M, Vanderborght T (2011) How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biol Conserv 144:672–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guerrant EOJ, Kaye TN (2007) Reintroduction of rare and endangered plants: common factors, questions and approaches. Aust J Bot 55:362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Livingston BE (1910) Relation of soil moisture to desert vegetation. Bot Gaz 50:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Long RL, Gorecki MJ, Renton M, Scott JK, Colville L, Goggin DE, Commander LE, Westcott DA, Cherry H, Finch-Savage WE (2015) The ecophysiology of seed persistence: a mechanistic view of the journey to germination or demise. Biol Rev 90:31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Menges ES (2008) Restoration demography and genetics of plants: when is a translocation successful? Aust J Bot 56:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merritt DJ, Turner SR, Clarke S, Dixon KW (2007) Seed dormancy and germination stimulation syndromes for Australian temperate species. Aust J Bot 55:336–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer SE (2009) Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Calochortiana 3:46–55Google Scholar
  19. Shimshi D (1967) Raising irises from embryo culture. Teva Va’Arez 4:225–229 (In Hebrew) Google Scholar
  20. Shmida A, Pollak G (2007) Red Data Book: Endangered Plants of Israel. Israel Nature and Parks Authority. Authority Press, Nature-Parks JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  21. StatSoft Inc (2004) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.
  22. Turner SR, Lewandrowski W, Elliott CP, Merino-Martín L, Miller BP, Stevens JC, Erickson TE, Merritt DJ (2017) Seed ecology informs restoration approaches for threatened species in water-limited environments: a case study on the short-range Banded Ironstone endemic Ricinocarpos brevis (Euphorbiaceae). Aust J Bot 65:661–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vleeshouwers LM, Bouwmeester HJ, Karssen CM (1995) Redefining seed dormancy: an attempt to integrate physiology and ecology. J Ecol 83:1031–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Volis S (2019) Plant conservation: the role of habitat restoration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Volis S, Blecher M, Sapir Y (2010) Application of complex conservation strategy to Iris atrofusca of the Northern Negev, Israel. Biodivers Conserv 19:3157–3169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Volis S, Zhang Y-H, Dorman M, Blecher M (2016) Iris atrofusca genetic and phenotypic variation, the role of habitat-specific selection in this variation structuring, and conservation implications using quasi in situ guidelines. Isr J Plant Sci 63:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
  2. 2.Geography DepartmentBen-Gurion UniversityBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations