Plant Ecology

, Volume 220, Issue 10, pp 985–993 | Cite as

Conspecific leaf litter and root competition inhibits shrub emergence in the Patagonian steppe

  • M. Victoria CampanellaEmail author
  • Alejandro J. Bisigato


A critical stage in the establishment of new individuals is seedling emergence and litter is a main factor affecting this stage. Recent research found that adults of Chuquiraga avellanedae are over-dispersed. Among several mechanisms, this pattern might be due to the negative influences of adults on seedlings through root competition. We performed field and glasshouse experiments to evaluate (i) the effects of C. avellanedae leaf litter and root presence on the emergence of conspecific seedlings, and (ii) the effects of leaf litter type (C. avellanedae litter, inert litter, no litter) and seed burial depth (seed at the surface or buried) on the emergence of C. avellanedae and Nassella tenuis (dominant grass) seedlings. The field experiment demonstrated root competition from adult plants on shrub seedlings, reducing seedling emergence. However, the effect of root competition did not differ between microsites (under-shrubs vs. between-shrubs). We dismiss the effect of allelopathy because inert litter (i.e., plastic leaves) had the same negative effect as C. avellanedae litter, indicating a mechanical effect. The glasshouse experiment revealed a species-specific response of seedling emergence. C. avellanedae litter limits the emergence of conspecific seedlings but was neutral with regard to the emergence of grass seedlings (N. tenuis). No differences in root competition between microsites and reduction of shrub seedlings by litter suggest that the over-dispersed pattern found for C. avellanedae is caused, at least partially, by litter effects on seedling emergence.


Shrub leaf litter Seedling emergence Root competition Grass-shrub steppes Over-dispersed distribution Microsite 



We are especially grateful to Lina Videla and Cristian Barrionuevo for their assistance during field and laboratory work. Anonymous reviewers and Michael John Lawes provided thoughtful comments on the manuscript. Ana Casalini and Gustavo Pazos helped with data analysis. This work was supported by the National Research Council of Argentina CONICET (PIP 11220170100981). This paper was written within the framework of the PUE-IPEEC-2016 22920160100044. MVC and AJB are CONICET researchers.

Supplementary material

11258_2019_968_MOESM1_ESM.doc (58 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOC 57 kb)


  1. Aguiar MR, Sala OE (1994) Competition, facilitation, seed distribution and the origin of patches in a Patagonian steppe. Oikos 70:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguiar MR, Sala OE (1999) Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. TREE 14:273–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguiar MR, Soriano A, Sala OE (1992) Competition and facilitation in the recruitment of seedlings in Patagonian steppe. Funct Ecol 6:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen MC (1993) Diaspore morphology and seed dispersal in several wind-dispersed Asteraceae. Am J Bot 80:487–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Armas C, Pugnaire FI (2005) Plant interactions govern population dynamics in a semi-arid plant community. J Ecol 93:978–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbier N, Couteron P, Lefever R, Deblauwe V, Lejeune O (2008) Spatial decoupling of facilitation and competition at the origin of gapped vegetation patterns. Ecology 89:1521–1531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barritt AR, Facelli JM (2001) Effects of Casuarina pauper litter and grove soil on emergence and growth of understorey species in arid lands of South Australia. J Arid Environ 49:569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beeskow AM, Elissalde NO, Rostagno CM (1995) Ecosystem changes associated with grazing intensity on the Punta Ninfas rangelands of Patagonia, Argentina. J Range Manag 48:517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertiller MB, Beeskow AM, Coronato F (1991) Seasonal environmental variation and plant phenology in arid Patagonia (Argentina). J Arid Environ 21:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bisigato AJ, Bertiller MB (2004a) Temporal and micro-spatial pattering of seedling establishment. Consequences for patch dynamics in the southern Monte. Argentina Plant Ecol 174:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bisigato AJ, Bertiller MB (2004b) Seedling recruitment of perennial grasses in degraded areas of the Patagonian Monte. J Range Manage 57:191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bisigato AJ, Hardtke LA, del Valle HF, Bouza PJ, Palacio RG (2016) Regional-scale vegetation heterogeneity in northeastern Patagonia: environmental and spatial components. Community Ecol 17:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonanomi G, Sicurezza MG, Caporaso Esposito A, Mazzoleni S (2006) Phytotoxicity dynamics of decaying plant material. New Phytol 169:571–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bosco T, Bertiller MB, Carrera AL (2015) Micro-environmental conditions affect grass and shrub seedling emergence in denuded areas of the arid Patagonian Monte, Argentina. Flora 210:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bosco T, Bertiller MB, Carrera AL (2018) Abiotic factors affect the recruitment and biomass of perennial grass and evergreen shrub seedlings in denuded areas of Patagonian Monte rangelands. J Environ Manage 218:118–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bosy JL, Reader RJ (1995) Mechanisms underlying the suppression of forb seedling emergence by grass (Poa pratensis) litter. Funct Ecol 9:635–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brearley FQ, Press MC, Scholes JD (2003) Nutrients obtained from leaf litter can improve the growth of dipterocarp seedlings. New Phytol 160:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Busso CA (1997) Towards an increased and sustainable production in semi-arid rangelands of central Argentina: two decades of research. J Arid Environ 36:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Callaway RM, DeLucia EH, Moore D, Nowak R, Schlesinger WH (1996) Competition and facilitation: contrasting effects of Artemisia tridentata on desert vs Monte pines. Ecology 77:2130–2141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Campanella MV, Bertiller MB (2008) Plant phenology, leaf traits, and leaf litterfall of contrasting life forms in the arid Patagonian Monte, Argentina. J Veg Sci 19:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Campanella MV, Bertiller MB (2009) Leafing patterns and leaf traits of four evergreen shrubs in the Patagonian Monte, Argentina. Acta Oecol 35:831–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Campanella MV, Bertiller MB (2010) Leaf litterfall patterns of perennial plant species in the arid Patagonian Monte, Argentina. Plant Ecol 210:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Campanella MV, Rostagno CM, Videla LS, Bisigato AJ (2016) Interacting effects of soil degradation and precipitation on plant productivity in NE Patagonia, Argentina. Arid Land Res Manag 30:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carson WP, Peterson CJ (1990) The role of litter in an old-field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance. Oecologia 85:8–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Casalini AI, Bisigato AJ (2018) Stress-gradient hypothesis and plant distribution along ecotonal gradients. Austral Ecol 43:807–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cavieres LA, Chacón P, Peñaloza A, Molina-Montenegro M, Arroyo MTK (2007) Leaf litter of Kageneckia angustifolia D. Don (Rosaceae) inhibits seed germination in sclerophyllous montane woodlands of central Chile. Plant Ecol 190:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chambers JC (2000) Seed movements and seedling fates in disturbed sagebrush steppe ecosystems: implications for restoration. Ecol Appl 10:1400–1413Google Scholar
  29. Chapman SK, Feller IC (2011) Away-field advantage: mangrove seedlings grow best in litter from other mangrove species. Oikos 120:1880–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chartier MP, Rostagno CM (2006) Soil erosion thresholds and alternative states in northeastern Patagonian Rangelands. Rangel Ecol Manag 59:616–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chartier MP, Rostagno CM, Videla LS (2013) Selective erosion of clay, organic carbon and total nitrogen in grazed semiarid rangelands of northeastern Patagonia, Argentina. J Arid Environ 88:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cipriotti PA, Aguiar MR (2005) Interspecific competition interacts with the spatial distribution of a palatable grass to reduced its recruitments. Rangel Ecol Manag 58:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cipriotti PA, Aguiar MR (2015) Is the balance between competition and facilitation a driver of the patch dynamics in arid vegetation mosaics? Oikos 124:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Defossé GE, Bertiller MB, Robberecht R (1997) Effects of topography, soil moisture, wind and grazing on Festuca seedlings in a Patagonian grassland. J Veg Sci 8:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991a) Plant litter: light interception and effects on an old-field plant community. Ecology 72:1024–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991b) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot Rev 57:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991c) Indirect effects of litter on woody seedlings subject to herb competition. Oikos 62:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fay PA, Schultz MJ (2009) Germination, survival, and growth of grass and forb seedlings: effects of soil moisture variability. Acta Oecol 35:679–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Flores J, Jurado E (2003) Are nurse–protege interactions more common among plants from arid environments? J Veg Sci 14:911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fowler NL (1986a) Microsite requirements for germination and establishment of three grass species. Am Midl Nat 115:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fowler NL (1986b) The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Franzese J, Ghermandi L, Donaldo B (2009) Post-fire shrub recruitment in a semi-arid grassland: the role of microsites. J Veg Sci 20:215–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ghermandi L (1995) The effect of the awn on the burial and germination of Stipa speciosa (Poaceae). Acta Oecol 16:719–728Google Scholar
  44. Goldberg DE, Barton AM (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gomez-Aparicio L (2008) Spatial patterns of recruitment in Mediterranean plant species: linking the fate of seeds, seedlings and saplings in heterogeneous landscapes at different scales. J Ecol 96:1128–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hovstad KA, Ohlson M (2009) Conspecific versus heterospecific litter effects on seedling establishment. Plant Ecol 204:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. IPCC (2007) Technical summary. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. (eds.) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Jensen K, Gutekunst K (2003) Effect of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: the role of seed sized and successional status. Basic Appl Ecol 4:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jurena PN, Archer S (2003) Woody plant establishment and spatial heterogeneity in grasslands. Ecology 84:907–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu G, Wan L, He F, Tong Z, Liu Z, Li X (2016) Effects of litter, seed position, and water availability on establishment of seedlings for two semiarid grass species. Plant Ecol 217:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loydi A, Eckstein RL, Otte A, Donath TW (2013) Effects of litter on seedling establishment in natural and semi-natural grasslands: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 101:454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Loydi A, Donath TW, Otte A, Eckstein RL (2015) Negative and positive interactions among plants: effect of competitors and litter on seedling emergence and growth of forest and grassland species. Plant Biol 17:667–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Mazzoleni S, Bonanomi G, Incerti G, Chiusano ML, Termolino P, Mingo A, Senatore M, Giannino F, Cartenì F, Rietkerk M, Lanzotti V (2015) Inhibitory and toxic effects of extracellular self-DNA in litter: a mechanism for negative plant-soils feedbacks? New Phytol 205:1195–1210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Merino-Martín L, Courtauld C, Commander L, Turner S, Lewandrowski W, Stevens J (2017) Interactions between seed functional traits and burial depth regulate germination and seedling emergence under water stress in species form semi-arid environments. J Arid Environ 147:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nogueira C, Nunes A, Bugalho MN, Branquinho C, McCulley RL, Caldeira MC (2018) Nutrient addition and drought interact to change the structure and decrease the functional diversity of a Mediterranean Grassland. Front Ecol Evol 6:155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  57. Rey Benayas JM, Fernández A, Aubenau A (2007) Clipping herbaceous vegetation improves early performance of planted seedlings of the Mediterranean shrub Quercus coccifera. Web Ecol 7:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rotundo JL, Aguiar MR (2005) Litter effects on plant regeneration in arid lands: a complex balance between seed retention, seed longevity and soil-seed contact. J Ecol 93:829–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Siffredi GL (2012) Guía de evaluación del pastoreo de cuadros INTA EEA Bariloche. Propastizal, Ley Ovina Río NegroGoogle Scholar
  60. Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK (1999) Autotoxicity: concept, organisms, and ecological significance. Crit Rev Plant Sci 18:757–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Talamo A, Barchuk AH, Garibaldi LA, Trucco CE, Cardozo S, Mohr F (2015) Disentangling the effects of shrubs and herbivores on tree regeneration in a dry Chaco forest (Argentina). Oecologia 178:847–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Vaz PG, Bugalho MN, Fedriani JM, Branco M, Lecomte X, Nogueira C, Caldeira MC (2019) Unravelling associations between tree-seedling performance, herbivory, competition, and facilitation in high nature value farmlands. J Environ Manage 232:1066–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Westoby M, Leishman M, Lord J, Poorter H, Schoen DJ (1996) Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 351:1309–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Winn AA (1985) Effects of seed size and microsite on seedling emergence of Prunella vulgaris in four habitats. J Ecol 73:831–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xiong S, Nilsson C (1999) The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 87:984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales, IPEEC-CONICETPuerto MadrynArgentina
  2. 2.Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan BoscoPuerto MadrynArgentina

Personalised recommendations