Plant Ecology

, Volume 220, Issue 1, pp 111–123 | Cite as

Nutrient patches are transient and unpredictable in an unproductive mountain grassland

  • Stanislav Březina
  • Kateřina Jandová
  • Sylvie Pecháčková
  • Věra Hadincová
  • Hana Skálová
  • František Krahulec
  • Tomáš HerbenEmail author


While plant roots respond consistently to nutrient availability under experimental conditions, our understanding of the role of such response in the field is hindered by poor knowledge of size and duration of nutrient patches there. In particular, knowledge of patch duration is critically important for understanding types of root response. We determined spatial and temporal variations in phosphate-P, nitrate-N and ammonium-N concentrations, and pH in an unproductive mountain meadow for which extensive data on fine-scale root distribution exist. We sampled soil solution weekly over 2.5 growing seasons using suction cups to in a hierarchical spatial design with the smallest grain of 3.3 cm. Overall concentrations of all studied nutrients were fairly low with occasional and short-term, but large-in-magnitude peaks, with no pronounced spatial or temporal structure at any scale. Temporal variation was much stronger than spatial variation, with both interannual differences and within-season differences playing a role. Phosphate-P was consistently highest in spring, whereas ammonium-N increased during summers. The ammonium-N, the major nitrogen source at the site, was negatively correlated with phosphate-P. Our data suggest that repeated sampling of soil solution in fixed positions is necessary to cover the entire extent of nutrient variation in the field. It shows that there are no stable nutrient patches at the fine scale, and the duration and size of nutrient patches are smaller than usual growth responses of roots. This implies that under such conditions, the best rooting strategy is homogeneous space occupation linked with fast physiological response to varying nutrient concentrations.


Ammonium Nutrient covariation Nutrient patches Nitrate Phosphate Suction cups 



We thank numerous colleagues for discussing the study design, analysis and interpretation. We also thank Petr Dostál for his valuable comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Hana Strusková and Alena Zajíčková were instrumental in performing the chemical analyses. Antje Göttlein taught us to construct the suction cups used in the experiment, and Jiří Smrž and his colleagues helped us to incorporate them into an appliance working under field conditions. We thank Josef Tilsch for taking care of the suction cups inserted into his grassland. This study was supported by GA ČR Research Grants #206/02/0953 and #17-055065.

Author contributions

SB conceived the experiment; SB with HS, VH, FK and SP designed data collection; SB collected the soil solutions; TH, KJ and SB analysed the data; and SB, TH and KJ wrote the text with contributions from all other authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11258_2019_906_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 2144 kb)


  1. Alpert P, Simms E (2002) The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol 16:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball DF, Williams WM (1968) Variability of soil chemical properties in two uncultivated brown earths. J Soil Sci 19:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borken W, Matzner E (2009) Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Global Change Biol 15:808–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady NC, Weil RR (2008) The nature and properties of soil. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  6. Budská E, Franče P, Světlík I (2000) Monitoring atmospheric deposition in the area of the Krkonoše Mountains. Opera Corcon 37:47–54 [In Czech] Google Scholar
  7. Cahill JF, McNickle GG (2011) The behavioral ecology of nutrient foraging by plants. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cain ML, Subler S, Evens JP, Josée-Fortin M (1999) Sampling spatial and temporal variation in soil nitrogen availability. Oecologia 118:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell BD, Grime JP (1989) A comparative-study of plant responsiveness to the duration of episodes of mineral nutrient enrichment. New Phytol 112:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chagnon P-L, Brown C, Stotz GC, Cahill JF (2018) Soil biotic quality lacks spatial structure and is positively associated with fertility in a northern grassland. J Ecol 106:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chytrý M (ed) (2007) Vegetation of the Czech Republic. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  12. Davy AJ, Taylor K (1974) Seasonal patterns of nitrogen availability in contrasting soils in the Chiltern hills. J Ecol 62:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Kroon H, Huber H, Stuefer JF, van Groenendael JM (2005) A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytol 166:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Kroon H, Visser EJW, Huber H, Mommer L, Hutchings M (2009) A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control. Plant Cell Environ 32:704–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dujardin G, Bureau F, Vinceslas-Akpa M, Decaëns T, Langlois E (2012) Soil functioning in a mosaic of herbaceous communities of a chalky environment: temporal variations of water availability and N dynamics. Plant Soil 360:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards KA, Mcculloch J, Kershaw GP, Jefferies RL (2006) Soil microbial and nutrient dynamics in a wet Arctic sedge meadow in late winter and early spring. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2843–2851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farley RA, Fitter AH (1999) Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in deciduous woodland. J Ecol 87:688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Felderer B, Boldt-Burisch KM, Schneider BU, Hüttl RFJ, Schulin R (2013) Root growth of Lotus corniculatus interacts with P distribution in young sandy soil. Biogeosciences 10:1737–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fierer N, Schimel JP (2002) Effects of drying-rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 34:777–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitter AH (1994) Architecture and biomass allocation as components oft he plastic response of root systems to soil heterogeneity. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 305–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fransen B, de Kroon H (2001) Long-term disadventages of selective root placement: root proliferation and shoot biomass of two perennial grass species in a 2-year experiment. J Ecol 89:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fransen B, Blijjenberg J, de Kroon H (1999) Root morphological and physiological plasticity of perennial grass species and the exploitation of spatial and temporal heterogeneous nutrient patches. Plant Soil 211:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freppaz M, Williams BL, Edwards AC, Scalenghe R, Zanini E (2007) Simulating soil freeze/thaw cycles typical of winter alpine conditions: implications for N and P availability. Appl Soil Ecol 35:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallardo A, Paramá R (2007) Spatial variability of soil elements in two plant communities of NW Spain. Geoderma 139:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. García-Palacios P, Maestre FT, Milla R (2013) Community-aggregated plant traits interact with soil nutrient heterogeneity to determine ecosystem functioning. Plant Soil 364:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gebauer RLE, Schwinning S, Ehleringer JR (2002) Interspecific competition and resource pulse utilisation in a cold desert community. Ecology 83:2602–2616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giese M, Gao YZ, Lin S, Brueck H (2011) Nitrogen availability in a grazed semi-arid grassland is dominated by seasonal rainfall. Plant Soil 340:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gigon A, Rorison IH (1972) The response of some ecologically distinct plant species to nitrate- and to ammnoium-nitrogen. J Ecol 60:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gleeson SK, Fry JE (1997) Root proliferation and marginal patch value. Oikos 79:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Göttlein A, Hell U, Blasek R (1996) A system for microscale tensiometry and lysimetry. Geoderma 69:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross KL, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ (1995) Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. J Ecol 83:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guo DL, Mou P, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ (2004) Spatio-temporal patterns of soil available nutrients following experimental disturbance in a pine forest. Oecologia 138:613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hadincová V, Herben T, Kovářová M, Krahulec F, Pecháčková S (1997) Fine scale changes in production of individual species in the Krkonoše Mts during ten years. Opera Corcon 34:59–77 [In Czech] Google Scholar
  34. Herben T, Vozábová T, Hadincová V, Krahulec F, Mayerová H, Pecháčková S, Skálová H, Krak K (2018) Vertical root distribution of individual species in a mountain grassland community: does it respond to neighbours? J Ecol 106:1083–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hibbert DB, Gooding JJ (2006) Data analysis for chemistry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW (2005) Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol 168:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirobe M, Kondo J, Enkhbaatar A, Amartuvshin N, Fujita N, Sakamoto K, Yoshikawa K, Kielland K (2013) Effects of livestock grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of net soil nitrogen mineralisation in three types of Mongolian grasslands. J Soil Sediments 13:1123–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hodge A (2004) The plastic plants: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162:9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hodge A (2006) Plastic plants and patchy soils. J Exp Bot 57:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hodge A (2009) Root decisions. Plant Cell Environ 32:628–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hodge A, Robinson D, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH (1999) Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete. Plant Cell Environ 22:811–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hruška J, Majer V, Fottová D (2006) The influence of acid rain on surface waters in the Giant Mountains. Opera Corcon 43:95–110 [In Czech] Google Scholar
  44. Hutchings MJ, John EA, Wijesinghe DA (2003) Towards understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communities. Ecology 84:2322–2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Inoue T, Fukuzawa K, Watanabe T, Yoshida T, Shibata H (2017) Spatial pattern of soil nitrogen availability and its relationship to stand structure in a coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest with a dense dwarf bamboo understory in northern Japan. Ecol Res 32:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual plants and its geostatistics. J Ecol 81:683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson PCD (2014) Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R 2 GLMM to random slopes models. Methods Ecol Evol. Google Scholar
  48. Kembel SW, Cahill JF (2005) Plant phenotypic plasticity belowground: a phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs. Am Nat 166:216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kembell SW, de Kroon H, Cahill JF, Mommer L (2008) Improving the scale and precision hypothesis to explain root foraging ability. Ann Bot 101:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kesser LH, Visser EJW, Dawson W, BinSong Y, Yu F, Fischer M, Dong M, van Kleunen M (2016) Herbaceous plant species invading natural areas tend to have stronger adaptive root foraging than other naturalised species. Front Plant Sci. Google Scholar
  51. Klaus VH, Boch S, Boeddinghaus RS, Hölzel N, Kandeler E, Marhan S, Oelmann Y, Prati D, Regan KM, Schmitt B, Sorkau E, Kleinerbecker T (2016) Temporal and small-scale spatial variation in grassland productivity, biomass quality, and nutrient limitation. Plant Ecol 217:843–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kotliar NB, Wiens JA (1990) Multiple scale of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kreuzeder A, Santner J, Scharsching V, Oburger E, Hoefer C, Hann S, Wenzel WW (2018) In situ observation of localized, sub-mm scale changes of phosphorus biogeochemistry in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 424:573–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kruse J, Abraham M, Amelung W, Baum C, Bol R, Kühn O (2015) Innovative methods in soil phosphorus research: a review. Plant Nut Soil Sci 178:43–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lamb EG, Haag JJ, Cahill JF (2004) Patch–background contrast and patch density have limited effects on root proliferation and plant performance in Abutilon theophrasti. Funct Ecol 18:836–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lamb EG, Stewart AC, Cahill JF Jr (2012) Root system size determines plant performance following short-term soil nutrient pulses. Plant Ecol 213:1803–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lavelle P (2002) Functional domains in soils. Ecol Res 17:441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leimer S, Oelmann Y, Eisenhauer N, Milcu A, Roscher C, Scheu S, Weigelt A, Wirth C, Wilcke W (2016) Mechanisms behind plant diversity effects on inorganic and organic N leaching from temperate grassland. Biogeochemistry 131:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Li H, Ma Q, Li H, Zhang F, Rengel Z, Shen J (2014) Root morphological responses to localized nutrient supply differ among crop species with contrasting root traits. Plant Soil 376:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Magid J, Nielsen NE (1992) Seasonal variation in organic and inorganic phosphorus fractions of temperate-climate sandy soils. Plant Soil 144:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Magyar G, Kun Á, Oborny B, Stuefer JF (2007) Importance of plasticity and decision-making strategies for plant resource acquisition in spatio-temporally variable environments. New Phytol 174:182–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Marschner H (1998) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. McNickle GG, Cahill JF (2009) Plant root growth and the marginal value theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4747–4751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McNickle GG, St Cassady, Clair C, Cahill JF (2009) Focusing the metaphor: plant root foraging behaviour. Trends Ecol Evol 24:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mommer L, van Ruijven J, Jansen C, Mommer L, van Ruijven J, Jansen C, van de Steeg HM, de Kroon H (2012) Interactive effects of nutrient heterogeneity and competition: implications for root foraging theory? Funct Ecol 26:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Novoplansky A, Goldberg DE (2001) Effects of water pulsing on individual performance and competitive hierarchies in plants. J Veg Sci 12:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB (2016) Package ‘vegan’. Version 2.3-3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  68. Parepa M, Fischer M, Bossdorf O (2013) Environmental variability promotes plant invasion. Nature Commun. Google Scholar
  69. Paul EA (2007) Soil microbiology, ecology, and biochemistry. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  70. Pecháčková S, During HJ, Rydlová V, Herben T (1999) Species-specific spatial pattern of below-ground plant parts in a montane grassland community. J Ecol 87:569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pecháčková S, Albrechtová M, Hadincová V, Krahulec F, Herben T (2003) Horizontal and vertical distribution of root absorption zones of four common grass species in a mountain grasslands. New Phytol 161:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2016) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-123.
  73. Robinson D (1994) The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 127:635–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rychnovská M (ed) (1993) Structure and functioning of seminatural meadows. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  75. Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM, Manwaring JH (1996) Temporal dynamics of soil spatial heterogeneity in sagebrush-wheatgrass steppe during a growing season. Plant Soil 184:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stark JM (1994) Causes of soil nutrient heterogeneity at different scales. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 255–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stuefer JF (1996) Potential and limitations of current concepts regarding the response of clonal plants to environmental heterogeneity. Vegetatio 127:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor AA, De-Felice J, Havill DC (1982) Seasonal variation in nitrogen availability and utilisation in an acidic and calcerous soil. New Phytol 92:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van Vuuren MMI, Robinson D, Griffiths BS (1996) Nutrient inflow and root proliferation during the exploitation of a temporally and spatially discrete source of nitrogen in soil. Plant Soil 178:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vincent EM (1970) A study of variation in phosphorus availability in calcareous soils. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  81. Von Wirén N, Gazzarrini S, Frommer WB (1997) Regulation of mineral nitrogen uptake in plants. Plant Soil 196:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhou ZY, Sun OJX, Luo ZK, Jin HM, Chen QS, Han XG (2008) Variation in small-scale spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and vegetation with different land use in semiarid grassland ecosystem. Plant Soil 310:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhou J, Dong B-C, Alpert P, Li H-L, Zhang M-X, Lei G-C, Yu F-H (2012) Effects of soil nutrient heterogeneity on intraspecific competition in the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Ann Bot 109:813–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Administration of the Krkonoše Mts. National ParkVrchlabíCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Institute for Environmental StudiesCharles UniversityPraha 2Czech Republic
  3. 3.The West Bohemian MuseumPlzeňCzech Republic
  4. 4.Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of SciencePrůhoniceCzech Republic
  5. 5.Department of Botany, Faculty of ScienceCharles UniversityPraha 2Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations