Plant Ecology

, Volume 220, Issue 1, pp 13–28 | Cite as

Contrasting elevational patterns of genetic variation in Euptelea pleiospermum along mountains at the core and edges of its latitudinal range

  • Hongjie Meng
  • Xinzeng WeiEmail author
  • Mingxi Jiang


Patterns of genetic variation along both latitudinal and elevational gradients have been intensively studied in the last few decades. To date, however, elevational patterns of genetic diversity and gene flow remain rarely compared for the same species along mountains at the center and edges of its latitudinal range. We used nuclear microsatellite analysis to compare the elevational patterns of both genetic variation and gene flow for Euptelea pleiospermum along elevational transects on the Qinling (33°N; leading edge), Shennongjia (31°N; mid-latitude), and Emei (29°N; rear edge) Mountains in China. First, we found no elevational pattern of genetic diversity along the two marginal mountains, but we found higher genetic diversity in the middle-altitude populations than in the low- and high-altitudes along the mid-latitude mountain. Second, there was no obvious genetic structure along the two marginal mountains, but individuals along the mid-latitude mountain were clustered into the upper and lower groups. Third, the contemporary gene flow along the two marginal mountains was higher than that along the mid-latitude mountain. Lastly, we found no isolation-by-distance along all three mountains and a significant isolation-by-elevation along the mid-latitude mountain but not along the two marginal mountains. Our results demonstrated that the elevational patterns of both genetic variation and gene flow for a tree species are different along mountains at the core and edges of its latitudinal range. These differences are likely associated with the discrepancies in spatial isolation, ecological stability, and vegetation types, but not historical events (e.g., post-glacial recolonization) at different latitudes.


Elevation Euptelea pleiospermum Gene flow Genetic variation Latitudinal gradient Species range limit 



We thank Handong Huang, Dong He, Haibo Liu and Hao Wu for their assistance during fieldwork. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31470515, 31570528; 31770572) and the State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change (Grant No. LVEC-2016kfxx).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11258_2018_899_MOESM1_ESM.docx (209 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 209 kb)


  1. Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124:255–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014Google Scholar
  3. Darling E, Samis KE, Eckert CG (2008) Increased seed dispersal potential towards geographic range limits in a Pacific coast dun plant. New Phytol 178:424–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Earl DA, von Holdt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC (2008) Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17:1170–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Editorial Committee for Vegetation of China (1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrich D (2009) Documentation for Structure-sum Version 2009. A series of R functions for summarizing the outputs of the program Structure ver. 2.2.
  8. Endress PK (1986) Floral structure, systematics and phylogeny of Trochodendrales. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:297–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro J (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491Google Scholar
  11. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1:47–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser DJ, Hansen MM, Østergaard S, Tessier N, Legault M, Bernatchez L (2007) Comparative estimation of effective population sizes and temporal gene flow in two contrasting population systems. Mol Ecol 16:3866–3889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu LK, Jin JM (1992) China plant Red Data book: rare and endangered plants. Science Press, Beijing, pp 680–681Google Scholar
  14. García-Fernández A, Segarra-Moragues JG, Widmer A, Escudero A, Iriondo JM (2012) Unravelling genetics at the top: mountain islands or isolated belts? Ann Bot 110:1221–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goossens B, Chikhi L, Jalil MF, Ancrenaz M, Lackman-Ancrenaz I, Mohamed M, Andau P, Bruford MW (2005) Patterns of genetic diversity and migration in increasingly fragmented and declining orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus) populations from Sabah, Malaysia. Mol Ecol 14:441–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo Q (2012) Incorporating latitudinal and central–marginal trends in assessing genetic variation across species ranges. Mol Ecol 21:5396–5403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halbritter AH, Alexander JM, Edwards PJ, Billeter R (2013) How comparable are species distribution along elevational and latitudinal climate gradients? Global Ecol Biogeogr 22:1228–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargreaves AL, Eckert CG (2014) Evolution of dispersal and mating systems along geographic gradients: implications for shifting ranges. Funct Ecol 28:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hensen I, Cierjacks A, Hirsch H, Kessler M, Romoleroux K, Renison D, Wesche K (2012) Historic and recent fragmentation coupled with altitude affect the genetic population structure of one of the world’s highest tropical tree line species. Global Ecol Biogeogr 21:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jost L (2008) G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jump AS, Mátyás C, Peñuelas J (2009) The altitude-for-latitude disparity in the range retractions of woody species. Trends Ecol Evol 24:694–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreyer D, Oed A, Walther-Hellwig K, Frankl R (2004) Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Biol Conserv 116:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol 9:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matter P, Kettle CJ, Ghazoul J, Pluess AR (2013) Extensive contemporary pollen-mediated gene flow in two herb species, Ranunculus bulbosus and Trifolium montanum, along an altitudinal gradient in a meadow landscape. Ann Bot 111:611–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meeus S, Honnay O, Jacquemyn H (2012) Strong differences in genetic structure across disjunct, edge, and core populations of the distylous forest herb Pulmonaria officinalis (Boraginaceae). Am J Bot 99:1809–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nordborg M, Hu TT, Ishino Y, Jhaveri J, Toomajian C, Zheng H, Bakker E, Calabrese P, Galdstone J, Goyal R, Hakobsson M, Kim S, Morozov Y, Padhukasahasram B, Plagnol V, Rosenberg NA, Shah C, Wall JD, Wang J, Zhao K, Kalbfleisch T, Schulz V, Kreitman M, Bergelson J (2005) The pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol 3(7):e196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohsawa T, Ide Y (2008) Global patterns of genetic variation in plant species along vertical and horizontal gradients on mountains. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ohsawa T, Tsuda Y, Saito Y, Sawada H, Ide Y (2007) Altitudinal genetic diversity and differentiation of Quercus crispula in the Chichibu Mountains, central Japan. Int J Plant Sci 168:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ohsawa T, Saito Y, Sawada H, Ide Y (2008) Impact of altitude and topography on the genetic diversity of Quercus serrata populations in the Chichibu Mountains, central Japan. Flora 203:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pan KY, Lu AM, Wen J (1991) Chromosome number and development of gametophytes in Euptelea pleiospermum (Eupteleaceae). Acta Phytotaxon Sin 29:439–444Google Scholar
  33. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research: an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959Google Scholar
  36. Qian S, Saito W, Mimura M, Kaneko S, Isagi Y, Mizumachi E, Mori AS (2014) Asymmetric gene flow and the distribution of genetic diversity in morphologically distinct Abies mariesii populations in contrasting eco-habitats. Plant Ecol 215:1385–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quiroga MP, Premoli AC (2007) Genetic patterns in Podocarpus parlatorei reveal the long-term persistence of cold-tolerant elements in the south Yungas. J Biogeogr 34:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reisch C, Anke A, Röhl M (2005) Molecular variation within and between ten populations of Primula farinose (Primulaceae) along an altitudinal gradient in the northern Alps. Basic Appl Ecol 6:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 3:23–225Google Scholar
  40. Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL, Cann HM, Kidd KK, Zhivotovsky LA, Feldman MW (2002) Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298:2381–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sato T, Isagi Y, Sakio H, Osumi K, Goto S (2006) Effect of gene flow on spatial genetic structure in the riparian canopy tree Cercidiphyllum japonicum revealed by microsatellite analysis. Heredity 96:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schierenbeck KA (2017) Population-level genetic variation and climate change in biodiversity hotspot. Ann Bot 119:215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sexton JP, Hangartner SB, Hoffmann AA (2014) Genetic isolation by environment or distance: which pattern of gene flow is most common? Evolution 68:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sexton JP, Hufford MB, Bateman AC, Lowry DB, Meimberg H, Strauss SY, Rice KJ (2016) Climate structures genetic variation across a species’ elevation range: a test of range limits hypotheses. Mol Ecol 25:911–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shen ZH, Hu HF, Zhou Y, Fang JY (2004) Altitudinal patterns of plant species diversity on the southern slope of Mt. Shennongjia, Hubei, China. Biodivers Sci 12:99–107Google Scholar
  47. Truong C, Palme AE, Felber F (2007) Recent invasion of the mountain birch Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa above the treeline due to climate change: genetic and ecological study in northern Sweden. J Evol Biol 20:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang IJ, Bradburd GS (2014) Isolation by environment. Mol Ecol 23:5649–5662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wei X, Jiang M (2012) Contrasting relationships between species diversity and genetic diversity in natural and disturbed forest tree communities. New Phytol 193:779–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wei XZ, Jiang MX, Huang HD, Yang JY, Yu J (2010a) Relationships between environment and mountain riparian communities associated with two rare tertiary-relict tree species, Euptelea pleiospermum (Eupteleaceae) and Cercidiphyllum japonicum (Cerdidiphyllaceae). Flora 205:841–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wei XZ, Liao JX, Jiang MX (2010b) Effects of pericarp, storage conditions, seed weight, substrate moisture content, light, GA3 and KNO3 on germination of Euptelea pleiospermum. Seed Sci Technol 38:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wei X, Sork VL, Meng H, Jiang M (2016) Genetic evidence for central-marginal hypothesis in a Cenozoic relict tree species across its distribution in China. J Biogeogr 43:2173–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weir B, Cockerham C (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370Google Scholar
  54. Wen CS, Hsiao JY (2001) Altitudinal genetic differentiation and diversity of Taiwan lily (Lilium longiflorum var. formosanum; Liliaceae) using RAPD markers and morphological characters. Int J Plant Sci 162:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191Google Scholar
  56. Woolbright SA, Whitham TG, Gehring CA, Allan GJ, Bailey JK (2014) Climate relicts and their associated communities as natural ecology and evolution laboratories. Trends Ecol Evol 29:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138Google Scholar
  58. Ying TS (2001) Species diversity and distribution pattern of seed plants in China. Biodivers Sci 9:393–398Google Scholar
  59. Zhang J, Yao X, Wei X, Chen L, Jiang M (2008) Development and characterization of 14 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the endangered tree Euptelea pleiospermum (Eupteleaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 8:314–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations