Serotiny in the South African shrub Protea repens is associated with gradients of precipitation, temperature, and fire intensity
- 127 Downloads
Globally, variability in canopy seed retention within closed cones (serotiny) among fire-adapted plant species is often associated with gradients in fire regime. Few studies have investigated the association of intraspecific variation in serotiny with geographical variation in fire and other environmental factors, especially climatic ones, and none has done so in the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) of South Africa. Yet the relationship between environmental gradients and intraspecific variation in reproductive traits may help us understand if those gradients partly shaped the evolution of the rich diversity or proteas in the CFR, and predict the resilience of fire-adapted Protea species to climate and fire regime changes in the CFR. We examined the association of the variability in serotiny in Protea repens (L.) L, the Common Sugarbush, with gradients in fire regime and climatic factors, and with plant age, cone age, and age of oldest closed cone across its 700 km-long longitudinal range in the CFR. Cone age was a significant covariate of the probability that a given cone was closed (our measure of serotiny), but plant age and age of oldest closed cone were not. Variability in the degree of serotiny was significant among populations. Serotiny was highest where fire intensity was historically high, where both mean annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were low, and where rainfall was least seasonal, but fire frequency was not a predictor of serotiny.
KeywordsCanopy seed bank Cape Floristic Region Intraspecific variability Fire adaptation Fire regime
We thank Jasper Slingsby, Tony Rebelo, Tom Slingsby, and Nick Lindenberg for their help. Kobus Kellerman and Jocelyne de Gouvenain assisted with the field sampling. Jane Carlson generously provided UTM coordinates of P. repens populations. John Silander Jr. reviewed the draft manuscript. We thank CapeNature, the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency, and the South African National Parks for permission to sample populations of P. repens under their jurisdiction. RdG thanks the University of Cape Town Biological Sciences Department for in-kind support and JM’s hospitality while conducting sabbatical research in his lab. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their thorough and constructive comments.
- Bond WJ (1984) Fire survival of Cape Proteaceae: influence of fire season and seed predators. Vegetatio 56:65–74Google Scholar
- Bond WJ (2003) Fire. In: Cowling RM, Richardson DM, Pierce SM (eds) Vegetation of Southern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 421–446Google Scholar
- Hilborn R, Mangel M (1997) The ecological detective. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Manry DE, Knight RS (1986) Lightning density and burning frequency in South African vegetation. Vegetatio 66:67–76Google Scholar
- Mitchell N, Moore TE, Mollmann HK, Carlson JE, Mocko K, Martinez-Cabrera H, Adams C, Silander JA Jr, Jones CS, Schlichting CD, Holsinger KE (2015) Functional traits in parallel evolutionary radiations and trait-environment associations in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa. Am Nat 185:525–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NASA (National Aeronautic and Space Administration) (2017) Fire information for resource management Ssystem (FIRMS). https://earthdata.nasa.gov/earth-observation-data/near-real-time/firms. Accessed 5 June 2017
- QGIS Development Team (2017) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. https://www.qgis.org/en/site/
- R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Rebelo T (1995) Sasol proteas: a field guide to the proteas of Southern Africa. Fernwood Press (Pty) Ltd., PretoriaGoogle Scholar
- Schulze RE (2007) South African atlas of climatology and agrohydrology. Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
- Scott L, Anderson HM, Anderson JM (2003) Vegetation history. In: Cowling RM, Richardson DM, Pierce SM (eds) Vegetation of Southern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 62–84Google Scholar