Love as De/Colonial Onto-Epistemology: A Post-Oppositional Approach to Contextualized Research Ethics
In this essay, we describe our path toward a shared understanding of a love-based onto-epistemic orientation to de/coloniality. Our exploration includes the negotiation of our intersectional and entangled identities, subject positions, and understandings of research ethics in education. A de/colonial sensibility is critical in urban educational contexts given the predominance of uninterrogated westernized epistemologies in curriculum and instruction. We seek to bring awareness to the colonial ways scholarly knowledge is constructed, disseminated, and used in urban teacher and leadership education. We critique colonial assumptions from a post-oppositional approach that moves away from antagonistic discourse and toward considering possibilities for a transformative future. We enact our proposed ethical orientation through personal narratives, critical self-reflection, and prioritizing knowledge construction from (non)traditional spaces such as those created by our mothers. We conclude with points of consideration for those engaged in urban education research that center love-based onto-epistemologies and the lived realities of people who are traditionally minoritized, racialized, or ignored in academia.
KeywordsTeacher education Collaboration Decolonization Research ethics Love
- Anzaldúa, G. E. (2002). Now let us shift… the path of conocimiento… inner work public acts. In G. E. Anzaldúa & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 540–577). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Aronson, B. A., & Boveda, M. (2017). The intersection of white supremacy and the education industrial complex: An analysis of #BlackLivesMatter and the criminalization of people with disabilities. Journal of Educational Controversy, 12(1), 6. Retrieved from https://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol12/iss1/6
- Bhattacharya, K. (2017). Because we were connected before this time on earth [Facebook status update]. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from https://www.facebook.com/kakalibh.
- Boveda, M. (2017). Sancocho: How Mami’s stories fed my curiosity and continue to sustain me. In D. Y. Ford, J. L. Davis, M. Trotman Scott, & Y. Sealey-Ruiz (Eds.), Gumbo for the soul: Liberating stories and memoirs to inspire gifted females of color. Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Celik, S., & Amaç, Z. (2012). Are teacher education programs failing the nation’s urban schools? A closer look at pre-service teachers’ beliefs about working with inner-city students. The Journal of Multiculturalism in Education, 8, 1–23.Google Scholar
- Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Davis, A. (2006). Moe Lectureship in Women’s Studies. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from https://gustavus.edu/gws/events/angeladavisflier.pdf.
- de Sousa Santos, B. (2005). Democratizing democracy: Beyond the liberal democratic cannon. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- de Sousa Santos, B. (2010). Epistemologias del sur. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
- de Sousa Santos, B. (2015). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in westernized universities: Epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epistemicides of the long 16th century. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 1, 73–90. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umb.edu/humanarchitecture/vol11/iss1/8/.
- Hinsdale, M. J. (2012). Choosing to love. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 20(2), 36–45.Google Scholar
- hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kozleski, E. B., Artiles, A. J., McCray, E. D., & Lacy, L. (2014). Equity challenges in the accountability age: Demographic representation and distribution in the teacher workforce. In P. T. Sindelar, E. D. McCray, M. T. Brownell, & B. Lignugaris/Kraft (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 113–126). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lorde, A. (1979). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In C. Moraga & G. E. Anzaldua (Eds.), This bridge called my back (pp. 98–101). New York: Kitchen Table Women of Colour Press.Google Scholar
- Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., & Boveda, M. (2014). Working together: Research on the preparation of general education and special education teachers for inclusion and collaboration. In P. D. Sindelar, E. D. McCray, M. T. Brownell, & B. Lignugaris/Kraft (Eds.), Handbook for research on special education teacher preparation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minessota Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, L. T. (1999/2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed). London: Zed books.Google Scholar
- Spivak, G. C. (1993). Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and postcolonial theory (pp. 66–111). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkins, D. E., & Stark, H. K. (2017). American Indian politics and the American political system. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar