Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 51, Issue 8, pp 1329–1334 | Cite as

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the underactive bladder questionnaire to portuguese

  • Marilia Perrelli ValençaEmail author
  • Jabiael Carneiro da Silva Filho
  • Isabel Cristina Ramos Vieira Santos
  • Adriano Almeida Calado
  • David D. Chancellor
  • Michael B. Chancellor
  • Geraldo de Aguiar Cavalcanti
Urology - Original Paper
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the current study was to perform the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Underactive Bladder Questionnaire (UAB-q).

Methods

The study design included the Portuguese translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the UAB-q in 90 patients from a urology outpatient clinic following international methodology. The psychometric properties tested were the validity, reliability, internal consistency and stability of the instrument.

Results

The content validity index at the item (I-CVI) and scale level (S-CVI) were above 0.80 and did not require changes. Regarding the reliability analysis, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.79. The internal consistency and the base time stability (test–retest) had excellent indexes; all were above 0.90.

Conclusions

These results indicate that the UAB-q is a valid, reproducible and reliable instrument for screening underactive bladders and is a potentially useful tool to guide health actions and improve the care of underactive patients.

Keywords

Validation studies Reproducibility of results Methods Surveys and questionnaires Underactive bladder 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to show our gratitude to The Underactive Bladder Foundation for support and permission to perform the study.

Funding

This study had no funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Marilia Perrelli Valença declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Jabiael Carneiro da silva Filho declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Isabel Cristina Ramos Vieira Santos declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Adriano Almeida Calado declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author David D Chancellor declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Michael B Chancellor declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Geraldo de Aguiar Cavalcanti declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Ethics Committee (CAEE: 56604316.0.0000.5192) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kullmann FA, Birder LA, Andersson K-E (2015) Translational research and functional changes in voiding function in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 31(4):535–548. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749069015000518. Accessed 5 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Valente S, DuBeau C, Chancellor D, Okonski J, Vereecke A, Doo F et al (2014) Epidemiology and demographics of the underactive bladder: a cross-sectional survey. Int Urol Nephrol 46(1):7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersson KE (2014) Bladder underactivity. Eur Urol 65(2):399–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolsoni LM, Zuardi AW (2015) Psychometric studies of brief screening tools for multiple mental disorders. J Bras Psiquiatr 64(1):63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chuang YC, Plata M, Lamb LE, Chancellor MB (2015) Underactive bladder in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 31(4):523–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2015.06.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sperber AD (2004) Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 126(1):124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polit DF, Beck CT (2011) Fundamentals of nursing research: evaluation of evidence for nursing practice, 7th edn. ArtMed, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-200012150-00014. Accessed 5 May 2018
  9. 9.
    Pires JG (2017) Temas fundamentais em Avaliação Psicológica II. Rev Avaliação Psicológica 16(2):249–251. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712017000200017&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Accessed 5 May 2018
  10. 10.
    Lynn Mary R (1986) Determination and Quantificatiom of Conten Validity. Nurs Res 35(6):382–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teles LMR, de Oliveira AS, Campos FC, Lima TM, da Costa CC, de Gomes LFS et al (2014) Development and validating an educational booklet for childbirth companions. Rev da Esc Enferm 48(6):977–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Test Commission (2017) The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). http://www.intestcom.org/  
  14. 14.
    Field A (2011) Discovering statistics using SPSS [electronic resource]. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/463d/c5de03c98e360b97d01dcac7a71a9a439dcc.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2018
  15. 15.
    Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abrams P (1999) Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int 84(1):14–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Conti MA, Jardim AP, Hearst N, Cordás TA, Tavares H, de Abreu CN (2012) Evaluation of the semantic equivalence and internal consistency of a Portuguese version of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Rev Psiquiatr Clin 39(3):106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grichnik VD, Grichnik VD (2006) Die opportunity Map der internatio- nalen Entrepreneurshipforschung: zum Kern des interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramms. Entrepreneur 49:1303–1333Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X (1998) A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 7:323–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cunha NDB (2014) Validity Study of the metatextual awareness evaluation questionnaire. Psychol Theory Pract 16(1):141–154Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chapman J (2012) 30-Level timber building concept based on crosslaminated timber construction. Struct Eng 90(8):36–40Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abarbanel J, Marcus EL (2007) Impaired detrusor contractility in community-dwelling elderly presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 69(3):436–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li X, Liao LM, Chen GQ, Wang ZX, Lu TJ, Deng H (2018) Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of underactive bladder. Med (United States) 97(3):1–4Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jeong SJ, Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Lee JK, Lee BK, Choo YM et al (2012) Prevalence and clinical features of detrusor underactivity among elderly with lower urinary tract symptoms: a comparison between men and women. Korean J Urol 53(5):342–348CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.The Underactive Bladder FoundationPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Oakland University William Beaumont School of MedicineAuburn HillsUSA
  4. 4.Universidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations