Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 627–632 | Cite as

Application of Internet+-based Tsinghua PINS Remote Tech to improve sacral neuromodulation programming procedure

  • Peng ZhangEmail author
  • Yao-guang Zhang
  • Li Min Liao
  • Jian-wu Shen
  • Yun-bo Yang
  • Jian-zhong Zhang
  • Li-yang Wu
  • Xiao-dong Zhang
Urology - Original Paper
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To explore the feasibility and safety of the Tsinghua PINS Remote Tech to facilitate sacral neuromodulation programming procedure.

Method

For 22 patients who had previously participated in the phase III clinical trial for treating overactive bladder with the Tsinghua PINS sacral neuromodulation system during several Hospital, PINS Remote Tech was applied to perform postoperative parameter adjustment in order to evaluate the safety and reliability of this new technique. Telephone surveys on Remote Tech-related questionnaires were also conducted.

Results

17/22 patients underwent 26 parameter adjustments, average adjustment frequency was 1.53 times per person; the average adjustment time was 23.4 ± 5.1 min (15–32 min). The total effective rate of the Remote control was 14/17 (82.3%). 7/17 (41.1%) patients’ symptoms recurrence due to not knowing how to handle patient controller, these patients were instructed on how to use it correctly through Remote Tech even without reprogramming it. Other 10 patients received reprogramming. There was no discomfort during and after parameter adjustment. The questionnaire survey showed that the remote technology saved patients’ time and lowered financial costs, significantly improved patient satisfaction. All patients expressed their willingness to recommend it to other patients.

Conclusion

The PINS Remote Tech can significantly reduce the financial cost and provide a remote reprogram control service that is as safe and reliable as outpatient program control.

Keywords

Sacral neuromodulation Remote Tech Long-term efficacy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from High Level Technical Talents in Beijing Health System (Grant No. 2015‑3‑030).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-zahrani AA, Elzayat EA, Gajewski JB (2011) Long-term outcome and surgical interventions after sacral neuromodulation implant for lower urinary tract symptoms: 14-year experience at 1 center. J Urol 185:981–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Kerrebroeck PE, van Voskuilen AC, Heesak-kers JP et al (2007) Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol 178:2029–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Kerrebroeck PE, Marcelissen TA (2012) Sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction. World J Urol 30:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kessler TM, La Framboise D, Trelle S (2010) Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 58:865–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen G, Song Yong, Ding Liu-Cheng et al. (2014) Chinese expert consensus on clinical application of sacral neuromodulation. Chin J Urol 35:1–5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang Peng Z, Jianzhong Wu, Liyang et al. (2017) The initial experiences of sacral neuromodulation on non-neurogenic, non-obstructive dysuria. Chin J Urol 38(11):806–810Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peng Zhang, Zhi-jin Wu (2016) Yang yong et al. The initial experiences of sacral neuromodulation on refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Clin Urol 31(1):67–71Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burks FN, Diokno AC, Lajiness MJ (2008) Sacral neuromodulation reprogramming: is it an office burden? Int Urogynecol J 19(8):1137–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Govaert B, Rietveld MP, van Gemert WG (2011) The role of reprogramming in sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 13(1):78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Powell CRTroubleshooting (2018) Interstim sacral neuromodulation generators to recover function. Curr Urol Rep 20(10):86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Datta SN, Chaliha C, Singh A et al (2008) Sacral neurostimulation for urinary retention: 10-year experience from one UK centre. BJU Int 101:192Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Voskuilen AC, Oerlemans DJ, Weil EH et al (2006) Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective single center study. Eur Urol 49:366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peng Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yao-guang Zhang
    • 2
  • Li Min Liao
    • 3
  • Jian-wu Shen
    • 4
  • Yun-bo Yang
    • 5
  • Jian-zhong Zhang
    • 1
  • Li-yang Wu
    • 1
  • Xiao-dong Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Urology, Institute of UrologyBeijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of UrologyBeijing Hospital, National Center of GerontologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Urology, China Rehabilitation Research CentreRehabilitation School of Capital Medical UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Urology Department of Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Urology DepartmentHebei Yanda hospitalBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations